[quote]LHT wrote:
Depends. 1. Is the money considered taxable income? and 2. Is it considered OK to make Mario my prag?[/quote]
1.) Yes, but at a reasonable tax bracket 2.) Yes, for up to 4 hours a day, but for the remaining 20, he’s making YOU his prag with his horrible Mario Lopez stories.
[quote]PimpBot5000 wrote:
[quote]LHT wrote:
Depends. 1. Is the money considered taxable income? and 2. Is it considered OK to make Mario my prag?[/quote]
1.) Yes, but at a reasonable tax bracket 2.) Yes, for up to 4 hours a day, but for the remaining 20, he’s making YOU his prag with his horrible Mario Lopez stories.[/quote]
Hmmm…4 contiguous hours? Or can I break it up over the course of the day?
[quote]LHT wrote:
Hmmm…4 contiguous hours? Or can I break it up over the course of the day?[/quote]
Yes, 4 continuous hours, just like he gives you 20 continuous hours of his fucking stories.
There are no breaks here.
Hmmm…now, I’m definitely leaning towards dwarf, but I should ask…can I make him my prag >while< he’s telling me his stories?
Sorry I’m harping so long on this topic, but I watched a lot of Saved by the Bell and Circus of the Stars, and I spent a lot of time in Tijuana as a teenager. Sure, I’d rather screw either Jesse or Screech…but I might be able to work with this situation.
[quote]LHT wrote:
Hmmm…now, I’m definitely leaning towards dwarf, but I should ask…can I make him my prag >while< he’s telling me his stories?
[/quote]
No. You aren’t fully understanding the gravity of the situation. 20 hours, straight Mario Lopez stories, NO REPRIEVE, NO ESCAPE.
would you rather go down on your mom or teabag a bear trap?
Yet again thanks to the inclusion of Ct Rockula I now have no clue what the fuck is going on.
[quote]Storm. wrote:
would you rather go down on your mom or teabag a bear trap?[/quote]
LOL
Just LOL!
Teabag a bear trap! There’s always a chance it’s stuck.
In Canada we tea bag bear traps and just call it a Saturday night.
[quote]Nards wrote:
Yet again thanks to the inclusion of Ct Rockula I now have no clue what the fuck is going on.[/quote]
fuck you, old man.
[quote]PimpBot5000 wrote:
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
the roo wants it and will not fight back.
no condoms allowed
you have to cum inside of it
[/quote]
OK definitely now the kangaroo, no question.
By a landslide…[/quote]
enjoy your roo poon
[quote]BDSLift wrote:
[quote]Swolegasm wrote:
[quote]pgtips wrote:
[quote]BDSLift wrote:
Isolation in the hole, hell 2 weeks.
Fuck your version of the perfect woman for a year then no more sex ever.
OR
Fuck your version of various 2’s for the rest of your life.
[/quote]
Can you post a pic of a 2? just so I can get a feel for it.[/quote]
This is a 2 on a bad day.[/quote]
Since it seems a better more universal unit of measure is needed
This is what we will now call a 2[/quote]
That is a 2 on a bad day
[quote]Thomasm122 wrote:
[quote]BDSLift wrote:
[quote]Swolegasm wrote:
[quote]pgtips wrote:
[quote]BDSLift wrote:
Isolation in the hole, hell 2 weeks.
Fuck your version of the perfect woman for a year then no more sex ever.
OR
Fuck your version of various 2’s for the rest of your life.
[/quote]
Can you post a pic of a 2? just so I can get a feel for it.[/quote]
This is a 2 on a bad day.[/quote]
Since it seems a better more universal unit of measure is needed
This is what we will now call a 2[/quote]
That is a 2 on a bad day[/quote]
The hell with this post for making me laugh.
Drop to 125lbs at 5% body fat, or stay your current weight but at 33% body fat? You’ll be about as strong either way.
Be 2x as strong, but never gain any muscle again or be 2x as muscular, but the same strength and you won’t get any stronger?
20" guns, but 12" calves or vice versa?
[quote]TigerTime wrote:
Drop to 125lbs at 5% body fat, or stay your current weight but at 33% body fat? You’ll be about as strong either way.
Be 2x as strong, but never gain any muscle again or be 2x as muscular, but the same strength and you won’t get any stronger?
20" guns, but 12" calves or vice versa?[/quote]
I’d choose #1.
I’m a short and naturally skinny dude, so I’d look awesome and shredded at that weight and level of fat.
[quote]Ct. Rockula wrote:
[quote]Nards wrote:
Yet again thanks to the inclusion of Ct Rockula I now have no clue what the fuck is going on.[/quote]
fuck you, old man.[/quote]
You see!
I know all of the words in your sentence there, but again the sentence’s true meaning eludes me.
I become even more confused when you mention Ray Packs all the time. What/Who the fuck is that?!?
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]TigerTime wrote:
Drop to 125lbs at 5% body fat, or stay your current weight but at 33% body fat? You’ll be about as strong either way.
Be 2x as strong, but never gain any muscle again or be 2x as muscular, but the same strength and you won’t get any stronger?
20" guns, but 12" calves or vice versa?[/quote]
I’d choose #1.
I’m a short and naturally skinny dude, so I’d look awesome and shredded at that weight and level of fat.
[/quote]
Lol these are meant to be 3 individual questions
[quote]TigerTime wrote:
[quote]Iron Dwarf wrote:
[quote]TigerTime wrote:
Drop to 125lbs at 5% body fat, or stay your current weight but at 33% body fat? You’ll be about as strong either way.
Be 2x as strong, but never gain any muscle again or be 2x as muscular, but the same strength and you won’t get any stronger?
20" guns, but 12" calves or vice versa?[/quote]
I’d choose #1.
I’m a short and naturally skinny dude, so I’d look awesome and shredded at that weight and level of fat.
[/quote]
Lol these are meant to be 3 individual questions[/quote]
Oh, yes. I understood that. The first part of #1.