World Maps Showing Different Stats

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:
Metric is stupid. Try building something in metric. Cut something in half, you got 0.5, again, 0.25, again 0.125, again 0.0625, again 0.03125. How do you divide something into thirds? 0.3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333. Yeah go fuck yourself.

Don’t get me started on soccer. [/quote]

I like metric for measuring smaller things in cm. & mm. Inches just get messy when you have to subtract prime fractions of differing denominators on the fly. Especially when some anal retentive draftsman and engineers get together to make a drawing. You always end up with some crazy shit like 41 7/64" minus 23 21/32" while some meth head is bouncing around like a rogue rubber dildo 20 some feet in the air waiting for a piece of metal and the torch is all fucked up.

It happens like that every damn time too.
[/quote]

I see your point there. I do a little gunsmithing and love imperial because if 5/16 is too big to fit, one can always go 9/32 or 19/64 without even thinking about it, but I’ve always found fractions easy too. And the answer is 17 & 29/64". I did that in my head, but it took a second and would probably have taken longer if some meth head was threatening me with a didlo.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:
Metric is stupid. Try building something in metric. Cut something in half, you got 0.5, again, 0.25, again 0.125, again 0.0625, again 0.03125. How do you divide something into thirds? 0.3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333. Yeah go fuck yourself.

Don’t get me started on soccer. [/quote]

I like metric for measuring smaller things in cm. & mm. Inches just get messy when you have to subtract prime fractions of differing denominators on the fly. Especially when some anal retentive draftsman and engineers get together to make a drawing. You always end up with some crazy shit like 41 7/64" minus 23 21/32" while some meth head is bouncing around like a rogue rubber dildo 20 some feet in the air waiting for a piece of metal and the torch is all fucked up.

It happens like that every damn time too.
[/quote]

Aw, come on, Uncle Gabby.

If there’s one thing you oughta know about our pal Skyz here, it’s that moral outrage is completely in character for him. If Skyz ain’t respondin’ with moral outrage, it prolly means he ain’t payin’ attention.

But unless the subject is somethin’ SERIOUS, like bannin’ guns or killin’ babies (or determining human origins and the age of the universe), it’s purdy safe ta say that he don’t meeeeean nuthin’ by it. [/quote]

I thought me and Skyz were cool, then I backtracked through the thread and figured out what you were up to.

[quote]Uncle Gabby wrote:
Metric is stupid. Try building something in metric. Cut something in half, you got 0.5, again, 0.25, again 0.125, again 0.0625, again 0.03125. How do you divide something into thirds? 0.3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333. Yeah go fuck yourself.

Don’t get me started on soccer. [/quote]

The same can be said for imperial.
Converting something from feet to inches and vice versa makes sense; or when you’re dealing with something larger than a foot, or something smaller than an inch…imperial totally makes sense, right? How about feet to miles or vice versa? /sarcasm

Metric scales are incredibly simple. There’s a reason the whole world uses it (minus a few select retarded countries).
From one scale to the next it’s by factors of ten.

[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:

Metric scales are incredibly simple. There’s a reason the whole world uses it (minus a few select retarded countries).
From one scale to the next it’s by factors of ten.
[/quote]

Come on, now, there’s a good reason the metric system was not popularly adopted in the United States. As you are probably aware, the meter is one ten-thousandth of the length of a curved line drawn between the equator and the North Pole, passing through Paris.

As there is no mention of the North Pole, the Equator or Paris in the Bible, let alone the concept of a spherical earth, the existence of these things is regarded as “just a theory” by most Americans, and any system of measurement based on such shaky ground is widely regarded as suspect, if not actually invented by the Devil.

Many schools will mention the metric system in passing, to teach the controversy, but the only people who actually believe in the metric system are scientists and other atheists.

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:

Metric scales are incredibly simple. There’s a reason the whole world uses it (minus a few select retarded countries).
From one scale to the next it’s by factors of ten.
[/quote]

Come on, now, there’s a good reason the metric system was not popularly adopted in the United States. As you are probably aware, the meter is one ten-thousandth of the length of a curved line drawn between the equator and the North Pole, passing through Paris.

As there is no mention of the North Pole, the Equator or Paris in the Bible, let alone the concept of a spherical earth, the existence of these things is regarded as “just a theory” by most Americans, and any system of measurement based on such shaky ground is widely regarded as suspect, if not actually invented by the Devil.

Many schools will mention the metric system in passing, to teach the controversy, but the only people who actually believe in the metric system are scientists and other atheists. [/quote]

Ha, that was great.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Karado wrote:
Yeah we were supposed to officially convert to this Metric system like 30 years ago, right?
But we just flat out resisted it…The only place I know where it’s used in America are it’s territories,
We saw ‘kilometer’ Speed limit signs in Puerto Rico when we were there a few years ago.[/quote]

I think mustard should be measured in liters in Karador’s home state.[/quote]

The energy one wastes responding to Mustard’s posts is measured in kilotwats.

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Karado wrote:
Yeah we were supposed to officially convert to this Metric system like 30 years ago, right?
But we just flat out resisted it…The only place I know where it’s used in America are it’s territories,
We saw ‘kilometer’ Speed limit signs in Puerto Rico when we were there a few years ago.[/quote]

I think mustard should be measured in liters in Karador’s home state.[/quote]

The energy one wastes responding to Mustard’s posts is measured in kilotwats.[/quote]

I thought that was a unit of quantity created by King Solomon?

[quote]SkyzykS wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Karado wrote:
Yeah we were supposed to officially convert to this Metric system like 30 years ago, right?
But we just flat out resisted it…The only place I know where it’s used in America are it’s territories,
We saw ‘kilometer’ Speed limit signs in Puerto Rico when we were there a few years ago.[/quote]

I think mustard should be measured in liters in Karador’s home state.[/quote]

The energy one wastes responding to Mustard’s posts is measured in kilotwats.[/quote]

I thought that was a unit of quantity created by King Solomon?
[/quote]

No, remember Solomon was pre-metric. In biblical times pussy was measured in pubits.

It’s in the Bible.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]LoRez wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]legendaryblaze wrote:

Metric scales are incredibly simple. There’s a reason the whole world uses it (minus a few select retarded countries).
From one scale to the next it’s by factors of ten.
[/quote]

Come on, now, there’s a good reason the metric system was not popularly adopted in the United States. As you are probably aware, the meter is one ten-thousandth of the length of a curved line drawn between the equator and the North Pole, passing through Paris.

As there is no mention of the North Pole, the Equator or Paris in the Bible, let alone the concept of a spherical earth, the existence of these things is regarded as “just a theory” by most Americans, and any system of measurement based on such shaky ground is widely regarded as suspect, if not actually invented by the Devil.

Many schools will mention the metric system in passing, to teach the controversy, but the only people who actually believe in the metric system are scientists and other atheists. [/quote]

Ha, that was great.[/quote]

Except the part about the lack of mention in the Bible of the concept of a spherical earth. He flubbed that one.

And it’s one tenth-millionth not one ten-thousandth. Otherwise the distance from Toronto to Ottawa would be about 5,000 hours.[/quote]

Oops. You’re right. Ten thousand kilometers, ten million meters.

As for the spherical earth in the Bible, maybe you can clear something up for me. See, I’ve never been to Israel, but I hear there’s this mountain, maybe Mt. Meron, that’s gotta be one helluva high mountain. I’m interested in this mountain because it says in the Bible that if you climb this mountain, you’ll be able to see all the kingdoms of the ancient world. To be able to see Rome, Assyria, Kitai, Indus… not to mention Mali, Nubia, and the kingdoms of the Incas, Mayans, Toltecs and Aztecs. That would be swell. I would have assumed that all these places would be so far over the horizon from the top of any mountain in Israel so as to be invisible, but apparently not. Heck, I was under the impression that even if you were in a spaceship in geosynchronous orbit over Jerusalem, you wouldn’t be able to see all of these kingdoms at the same time.

I know it has to be possible, because Satan took Jesus to this high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world. Right there in the Bible, plain as day. Tell me how this would be possible, assuming both a literal interpretation of these verses and a spherical earth. If Satan flew Jesus all around the globe in his private DevilJet, pointing out all the kingdoms, I could buy that. If he whipped out his iPad* and showed Jesus all the kingdoms of the earth that way, that would also be a plausible story. But the Bible doesn’t say that.

Also, the second coming of Jesus is referred to in the epistles as “the day of The Lord”. Now, nobody knows the time of Jesus’ arrival, so it’s hard to tell whether the “Day” of The Lord is literally daytime or nighttime. It does say that the second coming will come like a thief in the night, but that doesn’t mean Jesus himself will come in the night like a thief.

In the book of Revelation, though, we get a better hint. If we are to take this verse literally, then Jesus will come during the day, and it will be cloudy. I mean, he could come at night, and glow in the dark, but John doesn’t specify. What he does say is that everyone on earth will see Jesus at the moment of his arrival “with the clouds”.

“Every eye shall see him”. Now, if the earth were spherical, how could people on the other side of the earth see Jesus coming with the clouds? That’s just crazy talk.

Obviously the earth is flat. It’s right there in the Bible.

  • Satan invented the iPad. If fact, the Fall of Man occured when Satan induced Eve to try the Fruit of Knowledge, which was an Apple. She later upgraded to an Apple II.

[quote]blowharder wrote:

Some things are just too tough for the likes of you and me to figure out, Snarqanir. Too flippin’ tough. What will we do? What WILL we do?[/quote]

Keep sniping at each other in the Internet, I guess.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Where does he take a shit afterward?

[/quote]

Mckees Rocks.

Ask Chushin. He will confirm this.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

if you knew as much about the Bible as you’ve alleged you would already be familiar with the scriptures that mention or allude to a spherical earth.[/quote]

All of those passages can just as easily refer to a circular disc. The only reason we now “know” that the scriptures mention or allude to a sphere is because we have observed the spherical form of the earth firsthand. The writers of the Bible didn’t have spaceships (…that we know about!) or telescopes, so had to rely on their empirical observations. Same as we do now, but with better tools.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Varqanir wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

if you knew as much about the Bible as you’ve alleged you would already be familiar with the scriptures that mention or allude to a spherical earth.[/quote]

All of those passages can just as easily refer to a circular disc. The only reason we now “know” that the scriptures mention or allude to a sphere is because we have observed the spherical form of the earth firsthand. The writers of the Bible didn’t have spaceships (…that we know about!) or telescopes, so had to rely on their empirical observations. Same as we do now, but with better tools. [/quote]

So yeah, we can pretty much shit-can the swill that the Bible definitely teaches a flat earth.

And as you know, 14th, 15th and 16th century pre-Magellan explorers, geographers and mathematicians who also had no spaceships had already determined a spherical earth.

The flat earth theory was an old wive’s tale even back then.[/quote]

Egyptians too. I can’t find it right now but “Geometry For Dummies” has a really nice breakdown of the dimensions that they used in building which incorporate the curvature of the earth, relationships with astronomical points and the circumference of the earth at the equator.

Without the ancient alien stuff.

[quote]pushharder wrote:

So yeah, we can pretty much shit-can the swill that the Bible definitely teaches a flat earth.[/quote]

We should probably shit-can the swill that assumes that anyone can say with absolute authority what the Bible definitely teaches.

[quote]And as you know, 14th, 15th and 16th century pre-Magellan explorers, geographers and mathematicians who also had no spaceships had already determined a spherical earth.

The flat earth theory was an old wive’s tale even back then.[/quote]

Indeed. Problem is, the Bible wasn’t written by the 14th, 15th and 16th pre-Magellan explorers, geographers and mathematicians. It was written by agriculturists, military leaders and religious proselytizers 20, 30, or 40 centuries ago who had more important things to do than to worry about the size of the sun or the shape of the earth.

I’m not knocking the Bible, I just don’t use it as a biology, geology or astronomy textbook.