It is satire so for those easily offended take notice.
[quote]riverhawk23 wrote:
It is satire so for those easily offended take notice.
[/quote]
I was totally thinking about that site.
Instead of creating a nonsensical argument in your class between the genders, why don’t you one up her and take the mature route. Explain how men and women complement each other. Examine the differences between the sexes and mention the strengths and weaknesses of both.
Ultimately, ignoring the obvious procreation thing, explain how mankind would not be as advanced as it is now without the complementary nature of the genders.
[quote]Makavali wrote:
We don’t defy nature and bleed for a week without dying.
[/quote]
Actually, wouldn’t women’s ability to bleed for a week without dying be an argument in favor of female superiority?
(Not saying I believe in female superiority; just pointing out what’s an argument for what.)
[quote]Christine wrote:
I think a more honest speech would be why men and women need each other.[/quote]
Absolutely. But not much fun at all.
[quote]tedro wrote:
Instead of creating a nonsensical argument in your class between the genders, why don’t you one up her and take the mature route. Explain how men and women complement each other. Examine the differences between the sexes and mention the strengths and weaknesses of both.
Ultimately, ignoring the obvious procreation thing, explain how mankind would not be as advanced as it is now without the complementary nature of the genders.[/quote]
Brilliant. Then after everyone applauds and cheers the op and the teacher is an awee and as he walks past that one selfish bitch dissing men he whispers in her ear “What’s up now little girl?”
[quote]debraD wrote:
I would think women would be the sperm banks and men are the depositors.[/quote]
See? The guys just give, give, give, and the women just take, take, take.
It’s the way of the world.
[quote]NealRaymond2 wrote:
Makavali wrote:
We don’t defy nature and bleed for a week without dying.
Actually, wouldn’t women’s ability to bleed for a week without dying be an argument in favor of female superiority?
(Not saying I believe in female superiority; just pointing out what’s an argument for what.)[/quote]
It just ain’t natural. Nothing good comes from unnatural things.
[quote]hoosegow wrote:
You are deluded. Other than procreation, women really don’t need us. [/quote]
I disagree. I would think of a smart arse answer but I’m more inclined to agree with the initial post. I don’t agree with his specific examples. I think they are, for the most part, trite truisms. However, I do fundamentally, believe that we need men; just as they need us.
There is balance and two halves to a whole.
[quote]ouroboro_s wrote:
hoosegow wrote:
You are deluded. Other than procreation, women really don’t need us.
I disagree. I would think of a smart arse answer but I’m more inclined to agree with the initial post. I don’t agree with his specific examples. I think they are, for the most part, trite truisms. However, I do fundamentally, believe that we need men; just as they need us.
There is balance and two halves to a whole.[/quote]
A woman made an intelligent post.
WITCH!!!
I am so very surprised how guys sell themselves so short. Must be pussy whipped.
Let me save your ass on this one.
“Women lack spacial ability” They, women have built and created nothing. Even their shoes and clothing are designed by men, including the bra!
Have any of you ever seen the results of women congregating together for long periods of time. Not pretty!
So guys stop believing all this fucking horse shit. Without MEN! women have nothing to go shopping for.
It’s not called a mans world for nothing!
[quote]streamline wrote:
I am so very surprised how guys sell themselves so short. Must be pussy whipped.
Let me save your ass on this one.
“Women lack spacial ability” They, women have built and created nothing. Even their shoes and clothing are designed by men, including the bra!
Have any of you ever seen the results of women congregating together for long periods of time. Not pretty!
So guys stop believing all this fucking horse shit. Without MEN! women have nothing to go shopping for.
It’s not called a mans world for nothing![/quote]
“I’m okay with living in a man’s world, so long as I can be a woman in it.”
hey a pretty picture 
lets all be happy now
[quote]LiveFromThe781 wrote:
hey a pretty picture lets all be happy now[/quote]
=) happy face
[quote]Mondy wrote:
Hey guys, I’m doing a speech on how women would be lost in life for my speech class. I chose the topic because a girl in my class picked (out of the possible topics) men would be lost without women in life. I NEED HELP TO MAKE IT MORE RHETORIC AND PERSUASIVE. General comments and feedback and edits would be much appreciated. We need to win this for man.
God is fair and loving. Everyone is said to be created equal. However, if males and females were indeed equal why is that the best chefs in the world are men, best athletes are men, the richest people, you guessed it, are also men. There are some odd cases of women doing extraordinary things, but it is the word ?odd? that deserves our attention. Why is it odd? It is odd because the majority of women do not accomplish anything special. Their accomplishments are like farts against a hurricane (simile). Women may argue this was facts from the past; nowadays the gender roles have been equalized. If so, why is that a man and a woman of equal abilities with the same jobs, result in women being paid only 3/4ths than that of the man (Procatalepsis). That is 250 dollars less for every 1000!
Do not get me wrong, I have foremost respect for women, especially my mother. My point is to argue that without men, women would be lost in life.
Women need men for three distinct reasons:
No. 1 As men we serve as the provider of the house, as men we serve as the ?backbone? of society; as men serve as the infrastructure of the world (anaphora). Our roles in society has changed minutely since the Stone Age, instead of being the provider of food and security, we are now the provider of financial stability. Dr Nick Neave, an evolutionary psychologist said ?[women] not only need [us], they are fundamentally programmed to depend on [us]? His survey results reveals that women are more likely to forgive men for an affair, not because they are nicer, but because they fear abandonment. Even in cases where women provided more financially in a family, they often ?disliked the financial responsibility - perhaps reflecting the inbuilt genetic imperative to rely on someone else.? Women are biologically programmed to be dependent on us. Don?t believe me? Recall date scenes from movies , what is the most common question that the woman would ask the man? If you guessed what is your job, you are correct. A job signifies financial stability, the ability to provide for her and her children. This is why Henry Kissinger says 'Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.?
No. 2 All the differences in our mentality, physique, and thinking can be accounted by this one hormone: testosterone. This one hormone explains why men are more physical capable, more aggressive, and better at math. The abundance of testosterone makes men physically superior to women, in terms of size and strength. Without us, who would put the blood and sweat to build the magnificent engineering wonders, who would lift the heavy bricks and stones? Women, perhaps could have done it without men, but history has said, it was men that did it. Our mentality, physical capabilities, and risk taking have separated us from the women into a new category: the elite.
No.3 it is no surprise that g, statistics show that 80% of skydivers are men, and two thirds of rock climbers are men, we are more risk-taking. Risk is a double-edge sword; it is the basis for advancement and destruction. If Aristotle did not take the risk, that the world would be known as flat. If Bill Gates did not take the risk, Microsoft would not be founded. If Barack Obama did not take the risk, he would not be president. (parallelism) Our more adventurous and risky personalities, have created both harm and good. Nevertheless, through speculation of the advancement of the society over the past decade, the risks we took were well-worth-it.
Without us women would be lost, houses would not be built, society as we know it will not exist.
[/quote]
Your entire argument is based on deductive reasoning, which can be argued as neither entirely true or false; thus is the nature of deductive reasoning.
That said, for society to have risen to the point where it is now, man’s necessary role is undeniable, however the world that has been created does allow for interchangeability of roles so that tribal and family structures are not essential for an individual’s survival. It is not impossible and is becoming more common to find men and woman that have had no use for the other gender other than for random sexual encounters. Many disadvantages that women face are as a result of men being the the more dominant (not to be read as superior) sex, a price levied for the physically aggressive and protective role that man has played in the rise of the human race.
In the times of nomadic tribes of hunters and gatherers, men took the role as the primary hunters because of their naturally greater physical strength. This is not to deny that women can not become strong enough in time the kill and butcher prey, but the utilization of men in this role was a wise use of available resources (people, sticks, rocks and as much time could be allowed before starvation). A steady supply of food is only one requirement necessary for the survival of a species. Another requirement is the survival of offspring. It is accurate to say that a pregnant woman would be physically less capable of defending herself from attackers, especially during the actual birth of a child, which in modern times takes many hours. Human young are also extremely vulnerable during the first years of life. Even the menstruation process would be problematic, as the smell of blood would attack predators. These factors would require early humans to have individuals fill the role of protectors, a role filled by man.
This argument can go on and on, into how the most dominant hunters would become the leaders of the tribe, which would eventually transition to the ruling class, meaning that man would be the ruling gender. The point is that physical dominance transitioned to political power, which still mainly rests in the hands of men. Many of the disadvantages that women face are the result of social roles and expectations perpetuated through the centuries. However, in the America, at least, as it exists today, reliance between men and women outside of mating purposes is nearly nonexistent. Power, prosperity and superiority is won with the pen, words and thought, not brute strength. Men and women can both wield these equally well and carve out their own mark in the world if they so will it.
[quote]Bicep_craze wrote:
Porn. Woman get paid 5 times as much as guys in porn movies.[/quote]
If you are really confident in your writing abilities, you will use this line as a thesis for an essay on the misconception of gender pay disparity (that men have always earned more than women).
If you are even more confident in your math skills, you will show how a higher male salary for the same job, no matter the industry, is ultimately negated by the amount of money spent on porn (show the fraction of male porn consumption) every year which, ultimately, goes into the female starlets’ pockets.
(and if debra has a mad crush on me, my suggestions will make her tingle in the right places)
[quote]Makavali wrote:
ouroboro_s wrote:
hoosegow wrote:
You are deluded. Other than procreation, women really don’t need us.
I disagree. I would think of a smart arse answer but I’m more inclined to agree with the initial post. I don’t agree with his specific examples. I think they are, for the most part, trite truisms. However, I do fundamentally, believe that we need men; just as they need us.
There is balance and two halves to a whole.
A woman made an intelligent post.
WITCH!!![/quote]
Of course she is a witch. How can a woman carry an Atlas stone and yet still need a man to kill her spiders?
Even quantum mechanics would call that counter intuitive.
…only Spartan women give birth to real men.
[quote]streamline wrote:
I am so very surprised how guys sell themselves so short. Must be pussy whipped.
Let me save your ass on this one.
“Women lack spacial ability” They, women have built and created nothing. Even their shoes and clothing are designed by men, including the bra!
Have any of you ever seen the results of women congregating together for long periods of time. Not pretty!
So guys stop believing all this fucking horse shit. Without MEN! women have nothing to go shopping for.
It’s not called a mans world for nothing![/quote]
I have to applaud you on your inestimable ability to be consistent. Regardless of the specific topic, regardless of whether the thread is self created, each and every one of your posts comes across as patronising and self congratulatory. Your words have created for me, a mental image of a bitter, middle aged man who fancies himself considerably more intelligent and moral than than everyone around him.
If the above post was meant to be tongue in cheek, you’ve failed because of every post you’ve made that preceded it in every other forum on this board.
I’m off to wage a war on drugs
[quote]Carlitosway wrote:
I look at this way, most firemen, soldiers and policemen are MEN the grand majority. We bring security to women this cannot be denied. When a married couple are in a house and a big bang goes off in the kitchen it’s the man that goes to check it out not the woman, unless the husband is a freakin’ pansy.
[/quote]
I have a special robot for this purpose.