Why Get Mad at Bill Donahue?

[quote]therajraj wrote:

If there is a stat to show most alter servers weren’t boys (or close to the rate of abuse of boys) while the most of th esex abuse cases were going on, I will admit what I suggested has little to no chance of being true.

[/quote]

And one more time. This does not matter. At all. If all the alter boys were girls, it still doesn’t matter. Priests, again, are NOT cloistered monks! They spend MOST of their days with men AND women of ALL ages, and the ones I have known (many) spend so much time working that their actual time alone probably comes as a bit of a relief. Priests’ jobs put them around other people, of both sexes, nearly 100% of the time.

So, I’ll say it for you, since you are starting to make yourself look bad: What you suggested has little to no chance of being true.

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

These Priests have repressed sexual urges also hold a position of authority over alter servers and spend an inordinate time around them. Regardless of the sex of the alter servers, they choose to prey on them because they develop attraction overtime.

Edit: this is what I was suggesting originally, again not stating it as fact.
[/quote]

And how, exactly, are the urges “repressed” when they are releasing them all the time?

You know all these priest’s private lives? You know they were NOT masturbating? Tapping their foot in bathroom stalls? Visiting bath houses nightly?

The one thing we DO know is that the worst of them were getting off all the damned time on underaged kids. That’s not exactly my understanding of “repression.”

[/quote]

Human sexuality is not black and white. What one priest chooses as an outlet to release their sexual tension does not mean ALL priests choose the same outlet or any at all. Everyone is different.

Every heterosexual on the street who is imprisoned does not engage in homosexual behaviour while in prison. That does not mean those who do weren’t effected by the condition and environment they were under.

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Under the circumstances they are under, regularly alone around young boys for DECADES they eventually develop attraction. The same way it is not uncommon for a man who is heterosexual on the street to develop homosexual desires after YEARS of only being surrounded by men while incarcerated. like I said, human sexuality is a product of nature and environment.
[/quote]

Oh please. It is blindingly clear you don’t know the first thing about the Catholic Church so please stop talking as if you are some sort of authority.

Catholic priests are not cloistered monks. There are alter GIRLS as well as boys, and they are in contact with a vast number of women (from their parish) at any given time.

Seriously, I’m going to remember this the next time I read your “arguments.” You will just say whatever the fuck you think, regardless of its authenticity.

In the meantime, I’ll still be waiting for that evidence you must have seen to make such otherwise bald-faced libelous assertions.
[/quote]

And girls are also getting molested…approx 1/3 in of cases in Belgium are female.

Anyway, if you do not like my posts feel free to put me on ignore.

[/quote]

Yes, terribly, girls have been molested as well, but clearly not for the reasons you stated in the above post. Indeed that girls have also been molested makes your first statement look even more wrong.

If you want to come in an slander a group of mostly very good people with wholly unfounded supposition, don’t be surprised when you get called out on it. [/quote]

What do you feel is so slanderous about my posts?

I don’t think Catholics are bad people, I suggested the requirement for priests to stay celibate could play a factor in these sex abuse cases.

If I’m proven wrong, I’ll happily admit it and stop considering it a possibility.
[/quote]

Thing is, the lifetime celibacy = eventual Jeffrey Dahmer meme gets tossed around and used as a tool to defame Catholics and tear down the legitimacy of the priesthood everywhere. I can’t even imagine how many times I’ve seen it used here and even in the mainstream media as if it were a fact. Yet, there is no basis for this belief, NONE. If there is not one shred of evidence to point to the factuality of a certain matter, then using a such a statement as if it is self-evident is either dishonest or ignorant. Such statements are used almost exclusively as a rhetorical device that allows the user to defame his intended target when no other proper evidence is available.

I’ve seen it too many times and I’m personally sick of it. I was sick of it about a year ago and I actually started a thread about celibacy asking if anyone could point to any studies or evidence at all that celibacy leads to any sort of sexual disorder. Needless to say, no one was able to answer my request. Indeed, from my own studies, it appears that those most given to sexual disorders have the tendency to absolutely immerse themselves in pornography, masturbation, and a highly sexually active lifestyle. But you don’t hear about them because the biggest “sin” in our society today is anyone, ever, in any case, denying any indulgence or desire, no matter how twisted. Any anyone that tells you differently is just an intolerant bigot.
[/quote]

I don’t know how you could find a study applicable to this situation. How could you even find a group of people with normal sexual desires that will take a vow of celibacy for 10 years+?

[/quote]

So your just going to think what you think, without a shred of evidence to back it up? Okay then. [/quote]

I think what I have stated is a definite possibility and could be a contributing factor.

IMO sexually can be effected by the conditions and environment one is under. I have stated why I believe this and feel it could translate into the childhood sex abuse cases.

If there is a stat to show most alter servers weren’t boys (or close to the rate of abuse of boys) while the most of th esex abuse cases were going on, I will admit what I suggested has little to no chance of being true.

Until then, why is it what I’m saying seem so far fetched to you guys?

[/quote]

Because there is not a single shred of evidence to suggest this is the case, maybe?

What do you call that? Faith? [/quote]

You need evidence to consider it a fact. But considering it a possibility based on my explanation relating to prison?

Faith to me is believing in something you have no good reason to. I have explained the reason why I believe this to be a possibility.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

These Priests have repressed sexual urges also hold a position of authority over alter servers and spend an inordinate time around them. Regardless of the sex of the alter servers, they choose to prey on them because they develop attraction overtime.

Edit: this is what I was suggesting originally, again not stating it as fact.
[/quote]

And how, exactly, are the urges “repressed” when they are releasing them all the time?

You know all these priest’s private lives? You know they were NOT masturbating? Tapping their foot in bathroom stalls? Visiting bath houses nightly?

The one thing we DO know is that the worst of them were getting off all the damned time on underaged kids. That’s not exactly my understanding of “repression.”

[/quote]

Human sexuality is not black and white. What one priest chooses as an outlet to release their sexual tension does not mean ALL priests choose the same outlet or any at all. Everyone is different.

Every heterosexual on the street who is imprisoned does not engage in homosexual behaviour while in prison. That does not mean those who do weren’t effected by the condition and environment they were under.
[/quote]

But we’re not talking about the ones who didn’t release their outlets.

Strangely, there are FAR more of those than the ones who did.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]clip11 wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Given recent headlines, with the Catholic Church nationwide struggling with its worst sex scandal, you might easily assume these victims are boys and adolescent males – altar boys, perhaps, assaulted by pedophiles lurking beneath the collar.

They are victims, yes, but they are not boys at all. They are grown women, forced to live with a betrayal many misperceive to be borne almost exclusively by males.

Look again.

“Of the priests we’ve evaluated, more abuse girls than abuse boys,” says Gary Schoener, a Minneapolis psychologist and expert on clergy sexual abuse.

Despite media emphasis over the years on male victims – boys and men with horrific stories of their own – Schoener and other experts believe that troubled priests and other clergy are more likely to abuse females, especially adult women.

Sometimes their stories trickle out; more often, they do not.

Meanwhile, the number of male victims in a single parish can add up quickly, as one pedophile-priest may have unlimited access for a long period to boys on outings or other male-oriented church activities.

From this, big headlines are made.

“Everything’s always about the altar boys. It’s like nothing ever happened to the girls,” says Terrie Light of Castro Valley, West Coast regional director of SNAP, Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (survivorsnetwork.org).

Light was about 8 and attending church in the Oakland diocese when she went to the rectory looking for her mother. She was raped by the priest instead.

Now 50, she struggled emotionally for years – feeling “crazy and weird and defective.” There simply were no other stories about women.

“When I finally found other (abused) women, I started getting better,” she said. “I found out my story wasn’t all that uncommon.”

There are many explanations for the widespread misperception about victims of clergy abuse, though one of the most disturbing is this: the old “she asked for it.”

She must have seduced him. She made him sin.

The girl, however young, is cast as temptress.

Such was the logic played over and over to a Los Angeles woman, who became pregnant years ago after her priest and six other priests routinely had intercourse with her beginning when she was 16.

“As Catholics, we see priests even above angels,” said Rita Milla, who is now married with a second child. “To believe whatever they said had to be the right thing.”

After giving birth in the Philippines, where the priest had hidden her away, Milla returned with her child and eventually sued the church.

In 1991, the priest publicly apologized for seducing the teenager, but she did not win her lawsuit – in part, because it was filed too late. She had refused to settle, she said, because she would not agree to silence.

Yet even today, the courts are not always sympathetic to female victims.

Boys not only get more media coverage in clergy abuse cases, said Schoener, they also tend to get bigger verdicts. Homophobia, he believes, has been a “very, very powerful force.”

“In modern society, homosexual rape is considered a more heinous act,” said the psychologist, who is frequently an expert witness.

Ranking victims’ worthiness is the worst thing we can do – look no further than the bickering over the Sept. 11 fund. But overlooking a whole group of victims is right up there.

“There are a lot of women (victims) out there who believe they are alone and isolated and ‘special’ in a bad way,” says Light.

They are not, and that is the good news. For both sexes, it is also the bad.

Here is a link to more female sex abuse cases: News Stories about Female Victims of Clergy Sexual Abuse

[/quote]

Yeah some girls may have been abused, and nobody has said they weren’t. But you have to admit, most of those abused were teenage boys. Some studies say over 80% Catholic Church sexual abuse cases - Wikipedia. And trying to say they engage in homosexual acts, but they weren’t homosexual as long as they didn’t believe themselves to be homosexual, well, I could find less shit on a cow farm. So if im a paid assasin for a drug lord, then as long as I don’t believe myself to be a cold blooded killer, then im really a nice guy, right? Afterall, I believe im a nice guy, even though I murder people for a living.[/quote]

What is the makeup of sex of most alter servers while sex abuse was predominantely going on? Is it mostly boys? Mostly girls? 50/50?

These Priests have repressed sexual urges also hold a position of authority over alter servers and spend an inordinate time around them. Regardless of the sex of the alter servers, they choose to prey on them because they develop attraction overtime.

Edit: this is what I was suggesting originally, again not stating it as fact.
[/quote]

I don’t know the ratio, but common sense tells me teen boys weren’t abused simply because they were “available”. By that logic, if dogs, sheep, and chickens were avaialable, they would be equally as likely to have been abused. That would mean that the priests didn’t care where they stuck their cock, as long as it was in a warm hole of some sort. And I don’t buy the whole ‘position of power’ crap straight out of some womens studies textbook. Unless power meant the priest casting magical spells, then I don’t buy it. The priest sexually abused young men because they had a homosexual attraction to young men. Girls were abused less often, maybe because their were fewer of them around, but also because young women typically aren’t appealing to gay men. Sometimes the easiest answers are the most obvious answers.

If someone comes out of the bathroom soaking wet, and I just heard the shower running, then its obvious why they are wet. I don’t have to go thru 4 years of school and have a whole department created at a university to answer the question of why the person came out of the bathroom wet.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Under the circumstances they are under, regularly alone around young boys for DECADES they eventually develop attraction. The same way it is not uncommon for a man who is heterosexual on the street to develop homosexual desires after YEARS of only being surrounded by men while incarcerated. like I said, human sexuality is a product of nature and environment.
[/quote]

Oh please. It is blindingly clear you don’t know the first thing about the Catholic Church so please stop talking as if you are some sort of authority.

Catholic priests are not cloistered monks. There are alter GIRLS as well as boys, and they are in contact with a vast number of women (from their parish) at any given time.

Seriously, I’m going to remember this the next time I read your “arguments.” You will just say whatever the fuck you think, regardless of its authenticity.

In the meantime, I’ll still be waiting for that evidence you must have seen to make such otherwise bald-faced libelous assertions.
[/quote]

And girls are also getting molested…approx 1/3 in of cases in Belgium are female.

Anyway, if you do not like my posts feel free to put me on ignore.

[/quote]

Yes, terribly, girls have been molested as well, but clearly not for the reasons you stated in the above post. Indeed that girls have also been molested makes your first statement look even more wrong.

If you want to come in an slander a group of mostly very good people with wholly unfounded supposition, don’t be surprised when you get called out on it. [/quote]

What do you feel is so slanderous about my posts?

I don’t think Catholics are bad people, I suggested the requirement for priests to stay celibate could play a factor in these sex abuse cases.

If I’m proven wrong, I’ll happily admit it and stop considering it a possibility.
[/quote]

Thing is, the lifetime celibacy = eventual Jeffrey Dahmer meme gets tossed around and used as a tool to defame Catholics and tear down the legitimacy of the priesthood everywhere. I can’t even imagine how many times I’ve seen it used here and even in the mainstream media as if it were a fact. Yet, there is no basis for this belief, NONE. If there is not one shred of evidence to point to the factuality of a certain matter, then using a such a statement as if it is self-evident is either dishonest or ignorant. Such statements are used almost exclusively as a rhetorical device that allows the user to defame his intended target when no other proper evidence is available.

I’ve seen it too many times and I’m personally sick of it. I was sick of it about a year ago and I actually started a thread about celibacy asking if anyone could point to any studies or evidence at all that celibacy leads to any sort of sexual disorder. Needless to say, no one was able to answer my request. Indeed, from my own studies, it appears that those most given to sexual disorders have the tendency to absolutely immerse themselves in pornography, masturbation, and a highly sexually active lifestyle. But you don’t hear about them because the biggest “sin” in our society today is anyone, ever, in any case, denying any indulgence or desire, no matter how twisted. Any anyone that tells you differently is just an intolerant bigot.
[/quote]

I don’t know how you could find a study applicable to this situation. How could you even find a group of people with normal sexual desires that will take a vow of celibacy for 10 years+?

[/quote]

So your just going to think what you think, without a shred of evidence to back it up? Okay then. [/quote]

I think what I have stated is a definite possibility and could be a contributing factor.

IMO sexually can be effected by the conditions and environment one is under. I have stated why I believe this and feel it could translate into the childhood sex abuse cases.

If there is a stat to show most alter servers weren’t boys (or close to the rate of abuse of boys) while the most of th esex abuse cases were going on, I will admit what I suggested has little to no chance of being true.

Until then, why is it what I’m saying seem so far fetched to you guys?

[/quote]

Because there is not a single shred of evidence to suggest this is the case, maybe?

What do you call that? Faith? [/quote]

You need evidence to consider it a fact. But considering it a possibility based on my explanation relating to prison?

Faith to me is believing in something you have no good reason to. I have explained the reason why I believe this to be a possibility.[/quote]

Except your reason is based upon the false premise that priests are shut away and cut off from female contact, or something similar, which is patently false.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

I think what I have stated is a definite possibility and could be a contributing factor.

IMO sexually can be effected by the conditions and environment one is under. I have stated why I believe this and feel it could translate into the childhood sex abuse cases.

If there is a stat to show most alter servers weren’t boys (or close to the rate of abuse of boys) while the most of th esex abuse cases were going on, I will admit what I suggested has little to no chance of being true.

Until then, why is it what I’m saying seem so far fetched to you guys?

[/quote]

Because there is no repression here. Everybody who signs up, knows what they are getting into. Further they are encouraged to the last minute to bail out if they cannot handle it.
Chastity does not make molesters, molesters are sexual deviants and they would be molesters with or with out a collar. The vast majority of sexual molesters are not clergy of any kind. To say that celibacy is the culprit is just plane false. It is a worth while cause to discover and mitigate the incidences of child molestation. If you are really interested in the prevention and cure consider the following:

http://www.yellodyno.com/html/child_molester_stats.html

To concentrate on less than 0.01% of molestation cases makes me think it’s personal hatred of Catholicism rather than an actual concern for victims of child molestation.

Further, contrary to popular belief, we do have married priests, bet you didn’t know that?

http://www.stthomasmoresociety.org/TheDirectorsarticleforCatholicMensQuarterly.htm

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

If there is a stat to show most alter servers weren’t boys (or close to the rate of abuse of boys) while the most of th esex abuse cases were going on, I will admit what I suggested has little to no chance of being true.

[/quote]

And one more time. This does not matter. At all. If all the alter boys were girls, it still doesn’t matter. Priests, again, are NOT cloistered monks! They spend MOST of their days with men AND women of ALL ages, and the ones I have known (many) spend so much time working that their actual time alone probably comes as a bit of a relief. Priests’ jobs put them around other people, of both sexes, nearly 100% of the time.

So, I’ll say it for you, since you are starting to make yourself look bad: What you suggested has little to no chance of being true. [/quote]

So what? They aren’t allowed to have sex with these women. Part of the reason they choose alter servers is because of the authority they can use to manipulate them.

[quote]clip11 wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]clip11 wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

Given recent headlines, with the Catholic Church nationwide struggling with its worst sex scandal, you might easily assume these victims are boys and adolescent males – altar boys, perhaps, assaulted by pedophiles lurking beneath the collar.

They are victims, yes, but they are not boys at all. They are grown women, forced to live with a betrayal many misperceive to be borne almost exclusively by males.

Look again.

“Of the priests we’ve evaluated, more abuse girls than abuse boys,” says Gary Schoener, a Minneapolis psychologist and expert on clergy sexual abuse.

Despite media emphasis over the years on male victims – boys and men with horrific stories of their own – Schoener and other experts believe that troubled priests and other clergy are more likely to abuse females, especially adult women.

Sometimes their stories trickle out; more often, they do not.

Meanwhile, the number of male victims in a single parish can add up quickly, as one pedophile-priest may have unlimited access for a long period to boys on outings or other male-oriented church activities.

From this, big headlines are made.

“Everything’s always about the altar boys. It’s like nothing ever happened to the girls,” says Terrie Light of Castro Valley, West Coast regional director of SNAP, Survivors Network of Those Abused by Priests (survivorsnetwork.org).

Light was about 8 and attending church in the Oakland diocese when she went to the rectory looking for her mother. She was raped by the priest instead.

Now 50, she struggled emotionally for years – feeling “crazy and weird and defective.” There simply were no other stories about women.

“When I finally found other (abused) women, I started getting better,” she said. “I found out my story wasn’t all that uncommon.”

There are many explanations for the widespread misperception about victims of clergy abuse, though one of the most disturbing is this: the old “she asked for it.”

She must have seduced him. She made him sin.

The girl, however young, is cast as temptress.

Such was the logic played over and over to a Los Angeles woman, who became pregnant years ago after her priest and six other priests routinely had intercourse with her beginning when she was 16.

“As Catholics, we see priests even above angels,” said Rita Milla, who is now married with a second child. “To believe whatever they said had to be the right thing.”

After giving birth in the Philippines, where the priest had hidden her away, Milla returned with her child and eventually sued the church.

In 1991, the priest publicly apologized for seducing the teenager, but she did not win her lawsuit – in part, because it was filed too late. She had refused to settle, she said, because she would not agree to silence.

Yet even today, the courts are not always sympathetic to female victims.

Boys not only get more media coverage in clergy abuse cases, said Schoener, they also tend to get bigger verdicts. Homophobia, he believes, has been a “very, very powerful force.”

“In modern society, homosexual rape is considered a more heinous act,” said the psychologist, who is frequently an expert witness.

Ranking victims’ worthiness is the worst thing we can do – look no further than the bickering over the Sept. 11 fund. But overlooking a whole group of victims is right up there.

“There are a lot of women (victims) out there who believe they are alone and isolated and ‘special’ in a bad way,” says Light.

They are not, and that is the good news. For both sexes, it is also the bad.

Here is a link to more female sex abuse cases: News Stories about Female Victims of Clergy Sexual Abuse

[/quote]

Yeah some girls may have been abused, and nobody has said they weren’t. But you have to admit, most of those abused were teenage boys. Some studies say over 80% Catholic Church sexual abuse cases - Wikipedia. And trying to say they engage in homosexual acts, but they weren’t homosexual as long as they didn’t believe themselves to be homosexual, well, I could find less shit on a cow farm. So if im a paid assasin for a drug lord, then as long as I don’t believe myself to be a cold blooded killer, then im really a nice guy, right? Afterall, I believe im a nice guy, even though I murder people for a living.[/quote]

What is the makeup of sex of most alter servers while sex abuse was predominantely going on? Is it mostly boys? Mostly girls? 50/50?

These Priests have repressed sexual urges also hold a position of authority over alter servers and spend an inordinate time around them. Regardless of the sex of the alter servers, they choose to prey on them because they develop attraction overtime.

Edit: this is what I was suggesting originally, again not stating it as fact.
[/quote]

I don’t know the ratio, but common sense tells me teen boys weren’t abused simply because they were “available”. By that logic, if dogs, sheep, and chickens were avaialable, they would be equally as likely to have been abused. That would mean that the priests didn’t care where they stuck their cock, as long as it was in a warm hole of some sort. And I don’t buy the whole ‘position of power’ crap straight out of some womens studies textbook. Unless power meant the priest casting magical spells, then I don’t buy it. The priest sexually abused young men because they had a homosexual attraction to young men. Girls were abused less often, maybe because their were fewer of them around, but also because young women typically aren’t appealing to gay men. Sometimes the easiest answers are the most obvious answers.

If someone comes out of the bathroom soaking wet, and I just heard the shower running, then its obvious why they are wet. I don’t have to go thru 4 years of school and have a whole department created at a university to answer the question of why the person came out of the bathroom wet.[/quote]

Goats and sheep aren’t human.

12-15 years old aren’t that far removed from actual adults. I agree they were attracted to young men, I’m saying they developed that attraction over time based on the conditions are under.

[quote]therajraj wrote:
Goats and sheep aren’t human.
[/quote]

Yeah, but they are warm and wet…

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

I think what I have stated is a definite possibility and could be a contributing factor.

IMO sexually can be effected by the conditions and environment one is under. I have stated why I believe this and feel it could translate into the childhood sex abuse cases.

If there is a stat to show most alter servers weren’t boys (or close to the rate of abuse of boys) while the most of th esex abuse cases were going on, I will admit what I suggested has little to no chance of being true.

Until then, why is it what I’m saying seem so far fetched to you guys?

[/quote]

Because there is no repression here. Everybody who signs up, knows what they are getting into. Further they are encouraged to the last minute to bail out if they cannot handle it.
Chastity does not make molesters, molesters are sexual deviants and they would be molesters with or with out a collar. The vast majority of sexual molesters are not clergy of any kind. To say that celibacy is the culprit is just plane false. It is a worth while cause to discover and mitigate the incidences of child molestation. If you are really interested in the prevention and cure consider the following:

http://www.yellodyno.com/html/child_molester_stats.html

To concentrate on less than 0.01% of molestation cases makes me think it’s personal hatred of Catholicism rather than an actual concern for victims of child molestation.

Further, contrary to popular belief, we do have married priests, bet you didn’t know that?

http://www.stthomasmoresociety.org/TheDirectorsarticleforCatholicMensQuarterly.htm
[/quote]

And most sex abuse that occurs in the non-secular world happens in the Catholic Church. Why is that?

Maybe sexual repression isn’t the correct term. How about built up unreleased sexual tension?

I knew priests marry but they still don’t fuck.

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

If there is a stat to show most alter servers weren’t boys (or close to the rate of abuse of boys) while the most of th esex abuse cases were going on, I will admit what I suggested has little to no chance of being true.

[/quote]

And one more time. This does not matter. At all. If all the alter boys were girls, it still doesn’t matter. Priests, again, are NOT cloistered monks! They spend MOST of their days with men AND women of ALL ages, and the ones I have known (many) spend so much time working that their actual time alone probably comes as a bit of a relief. Priests’ jobs put them around other people, of both sexes, nearly 100% of the time.

So, I’ll say it for you, since you are starting to make yourself look bad: What you suggested has little to no chance of being true. [/quote]

So what? They aren’t allowed to have sex with these women. Part of the reason they choose alter servers is because of the authority they can use to manipulate them.

[/quote]

Give me a break. Are you “allowed” to have sex with the majority of the women you are around on a day to day basis?

And now you seem to be subtly shifting your argument from conditions (the symptoms of which only actually manifest in a tiny percentage of priests, for some reason) to a state of mind. I actually think this latter is much closer to the truth, but it’s not what you’ve been suggesting up to now.

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]therajraj wrote:

If there is a stat to show most alter servers weren’t boys (or close to the rate of abuse of boys) while the most of th esex abuse cases were going on, I will admit what I suggested has little to no chance of being true.

[/quote]

And one more time. This does not matter. At all. If all the alter boys were girls, it still doesn’t matter. Priests, again, are NOT cloistered monks! They spend MOST of their days with men AND women of ALL ages, and the ones I have known (many) spend so much time working that their actual time alone probably comes as a bit of a relief. Priests’ jobs put them around other people, of both sexes, nearly 100% of the time.

So, I’ll say it for you, since you are starting to make yourself look bad: What you suggested has little to no chance of being true. [/quote]

So what? They aren’t allowed to have sex with these women. Part of the reason they choose alter servers is because of the authority they can use to manipulate them.

[/quote]

Give me a break. Are you “allowed” to have sex with the majority of the women you are around on a day to day basis?

And now you seem to be subtly shifting your argument from conditions (the symptoms of which only actually manifest in a tiny percentage of priests, for some reason) to a state of mind. I actually think this latter is much closer to the truth, but it’s not what you’ve been suggesting up to now.
[/quote]

I thought from the beginning celibacy is a contributing factor. There are likely more.

Now tell me what are your thoughts on the OP?

Do you consider this a homosexual problem? What is the cause of sex abuse in the CC?

[quote]therajraj wrote:

And most sex abuse that occurs in the non-secular world happens in the Catholic Church. Why is that?

[quote]
If you are going by raw numbers there are more, if you go by percentages we are the same as everybody else. The RCC is the biggest church in the world with millions of ordained clergy. Actually percentage wise we’re less. By the sheer number of ordained, we’re bound to have more of everything including ordained criminals.
1 in 5 people in the world is a Catholic. Your going to have bad apples in that large a crowd. Also, like I said before, the media only shows you the accusations never the acquittals.

Did you know that every accusation has been made by one single lawyer, Jeff Anderson? An activist lawyer with a chip on his shoulder. He is a one man wrecking crew. And no with billions being dolled out in compensation, he is absolutely not in it for the money.

Oh brother, married priests do too fuck. Otherwise whats the point? If you had to put up with a woman’s bullshit and you don’t even get to fuck 'er would be the raw deal of the century.

[quote]pat wrote:
Oh brother, married priests do too fuck. Otherwise whats the point? If you had to put up with a woman’s bullshit and you don’t even get to fuck 'er would be the raw deal of the century.[/quote]

LOL - true. I didn’t know that, they all should be able to fuck. I don’t know companionship?

What is your opinion on the causes? Are you guys all in agreement that this is a homosexual problem?

[quote]Gettnitdone wrote:
This is just another lame attempt to vilify and attack gays.

Priests molesting boys is fucked up.

Someones mad…[/quote]

Yes, priests molesting boys is fucked up. Glad we agree. And, I don’t think anyone is attacking gays, if anything we’re attacking the media. bites apple

[quote]therajraj wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:
Oh brother, married priests do too fuck. Otherwise whats the point? If you had to put up with a woman’s bullshit and you don’t even get to fuck 'er would be the raw deal of the century.[/quote]

LOL - true. I didn’t know that, they all should be able to fuck. I don’t know companionship?

What is your opinion on the causes? Are you guys all in agreement that this is a homosexual problem?[/quote]

I think the causes are multifaceted but it is certainly a derangement. Not to remove culpability, the assholes who did it know they were doing wrong. But to be attracted to such behavior is a derangement. One of the links I gave gives a good idea into some of the causes, most of which center around being abused, and usually the signs are there from early on as there being something a little off kilter. If I were to render a guess, I would say that most of the priests who molested got into the priesthood because they thought that being a priest would ‘cure’ them. Much like a girl gets pregnant for the purpose to ‘make their marriage better’ or ‘keep their boyfriend’. When any and all things are just a cover up from the core issue.

I don’t think homosexuality is a problem or a cause per se, but the fact that most of the cases were homosexual in nature, it is right to give pause. There really isn’t a good definition of homosexual and healthy and homosexual and deranged too, not until it’s too late. I have known gay priests before and they are mighty fine people and the don’t go around groping people because they have homosexual leanings. They chose to be celibate and so they are…

Celibacy is kind of like a switch. Most people do not understand how to ‘turn it off’…I did it for a couple of years and to be perfectly honest, those were the best years of my life. It’s hard to ‘turn it off’ but once you do, it’s actually not that hard. It’s actually much like dieting and training…After the initial difficulty, you kind of just cruise.

As has been pointed out by BC and kamuii, the priests in question weren’t pedophiles or homosexuals. They were ephebophiles.

More importantly, the whole argument is a fail.

Even if they were gay (and they weren’t), why would it mean homosexuality is inherently bad, any more than heterosexual abuse of young women would mean that heterosexuality is bad?

[quote]therajraj wrote:
http://www.snapnetwork.org/[/quote]

Really? That is your source. Their agenda is purely do destroy the Church and get revenge no matter if just or brought about justly. They don’t much care for justice, logic, or truth in their claims, check on the report on them.

Here is a report by Bill Donahue on SNAP: http://www.catholicleague.org/images/upload/image_201108223332.pdf

[quote]GorillaMon wrote:
Also, girls are far more likely to have been sexually abused + the vast majority of child sex offenders are male…sooooo…yeah, paedophiles with no morals, empathy, self-control are the problem here. [/quote]

Wait are you saying girls were more sexually abused? Because studies show 81% (well, 80.9%) were boys. So…