Why Did God Create......

[quote]Voluminous wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

Belief is simply an assertion that something is true with out knowing all the facts. Almost every moment of your life is consumed by belief…

For instance, people on the east coast believed they were safe from earthquakes…They aren’t.[/quote]

Hmmmm I take your point.

Perhaps my point would be better placed in specific circumstances.

As in religion cannot be proved (or disproved some would say)

So yes Belief is simply an assertion that something is true with out knowing all the facts - however ferociousness in which people defend a religious belief is quite astounding.

All you can know is you don’t know everything. I may well be wrong and God exists and I leave that possibility open - if religious people did the same in reverse the world would be alot quieter place.
[/quote]

But nobody would ever learn anything if people didn’t try. And you don’t have to know everything to know something…

I can discuss God with out ever mentioning religion.

Further, you cannot know what personal revelation or experience somebody has had. The problem with such things is they cannot be expressed rationally. So they may in fact know something they could never express.

[quote]
Not to mention you faggots imprisoned Galileo and feared the general public’s acquisition of knowledge. Grats on impeding our civilization’s progress and advancement in technology, science, and equality for 2000 years. [/quote]

are you really suggesting that “civilization’s progress and advancement in technology, science and equality” would have been greater if Constantine never converted to christianity ?

seriously ?

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Voluminous wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

Belief is simply an assertion that something is true with out knowing all the facts. Almost every moment of your life is consumed by belief…

For instance, people on the east coast believed they were safe from earthquakes…They aren’t.[/quote]

Hmmmm I take your point.

Perhaps my point would be better placed in specific circumstances.

As in religion cannot be proved (or disproved some would say)

So yes Belief is simply an assertion that something is true with out knowing all the facts - however ferociousness in which people defend a religious belief is quite astounding.

All you can know is you don’t know everything. I may well be wrong and God exists and I leave that possibility open - if religious people did the same in reverse the world would be alot quieter place.
[/quote]

But nobody would ever learn anything if people didn’t try. And you don’t have to know everything to know something…

I can discuss God with out ever mentioning religion.

Further, you cannot know what personal revelation or experience somebody has had. The problem with such things is they cannot be expressed rationally. So they may in fact know something they could never express.[/quote]

I like your earlier assertion better:

To be certain of anything, you must know everything.

Lacking perfect knowledge, we can’t be perfectly certain that any of our beliefs are actually true.

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Zooguido wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]Zooguido wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]Cortes wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:
I’m back. Let’s get right into it.

Why do whales have pelvic bones? [/quote]

Alien technology.

Next.[/quote]

Not quite. Why did God find it necessary to give whales, an animal with no need for a pelvic bone, a pelvic bone?

More interestingly, the human sacrum and coccyx appear as several vertebrae fused together. If we are the result of creation, why did God create us in such a way that we would look as though we evolved from monkeys? Why not just give us a solid sacrum, for example. [/quote]

I got no problem with evolution. [/quote]

Then how do you reconcile the theory of evolution with the story of creation in Genesis?[/quote]

Sorry, I’m not seeing the problem here.

What issue do you have with it?
[/quote]

If Adam and Eve were created as is, then there was no evolution. [/quote]

It’s a story, not a scientific model. You think a goat herder 2000 years ago would be receptive to hearing the intricacies of single-nucleotide polymorphisms?

[/quote]

Then God is a rather malevolent being for not correcting his vast array of worshipers who think otherwise. Though, you think God would have the foresight to at least give a passing mention in the bible that when he says “created” he really means “kicked off a process that would result in ‘man’ after several millions of years”… and given that god is all powerful, why would he bother with this process when he knows the result? He could just whip us up and skip all the monkey business… no pun intended.
which brings up another question, why did God never give us any information about the universe that we didn’t already know to be factual? Further still, the answers he offers for these “at the time unknowns” are so convoluted and vague that instead of hinting us in the right direction they actually took us backwards and resulted in violent wars and genocide (many of which God personally commanded to happen).

Ultimately, the answers in the bible given in genesis in no way logically lead to what science has found to be true and it can only be viewed as such while working backwards ex post-facto.

[/quote]

The bible isn’t a science book or a history book. The creation stories have important messages and truths for all people.
God also was kind enough to provide us math, science and history so we can know more about the world we live in with out having to refer to a religious text to do it.

Are you sure you read the bible? It sure doesn’t sound like…
[/quote]

Right, because as we all know it’s impossible to have both read the bible AND disagree with it. rolls eyes
[/quote]
You can disagree with it all you want, that’s not the issue. It just seems you have a weak grasp on the subject matter.

Archimedes gave us mathematics.
Newton gave us classical mechanics.
Galileo gave us science.

Get it right.

Idiot.[/quote]

Oh they invented it? Or discovered it? Drive by idiot.
[/quote]

It’s impossible to “discover” a systematic thought process and method of solving problems and/or creating hypotheses that you develop inside your head. You could say that I’m saying they “invented” it, yes. It’s impossible to discover an “idea” unless it’s already written down and you happen to come across it on a pamphlet or sheet of paper. Even then, you’re not discovering an idea. Someone already went through the time to come to those conclusions and write them down.

You don’t make any sense.[/quote]

And your to dumb to discuss anything with if this is the best you can do…‘systematic thought process’…LOL![/quote]

… you’re the guy who DOESN’T spend more time undermining the person than his arguments, aren’t you?

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]kamui wrote:
TigerTime’s journey remind me of this little story :

[quote]
A terrible storm came into a town and local officials sent out an emergency warning that the riverbanks would soon overflow and flood the nearby homes. They ordered everyone in the town to evacuate immediately.

A faithful Christian man heard the warning and decided to stay, saying to himself, ?I will trust God and if I am in danger, then God will send a divine miracle to save me.?

The neighbors came by his house and said to him, ?We?re leaving and there is room for you in our car, please come with us!? But the man declined. ?I have faith that God will save me.?

As the man stood on his porch watching the water rise up the steps, a man in a canoe paddled by and called to him, ?Hurry and come into my canoe, the waters are rising quickly!? But the man again said, ?No thanks, God will save me.?

The floodwaters rose higher pouring water into his living room and the man had to retreat to the second floor. A police motorboat came by and saw him at the window. ?We will come up and rescue you!? they shouted. But the man refused, waving them off saying, ?Use your time to save someone else! I have faith that God will save me!?

The flood waters rose higher and higher and the man had to climb up to his rooftop.

A helicopter spotted him and dropped a rope ladder. A rescue officer came down the ladder and pleaded with the man, “Grab my hand and I will pull you up!” But the man STILL refused, folding his arms tightly to his body. ?No thank you! God will save me!?

Shortly after, the house broke up and the floodwaters swept the man away and he drowned.

When in Heaven, the man stood before God and asked, ?I put all of my faith in You. Why didn?t You come and save me??

And God said, ?Son, I sent you a warning. I sent you a car. I sent you a canoe. I sent you a motorboat. I sent you a helicopter. What more were you looking for?? [/quote][/quote]

The only thing God has sent me is the bible. Which, even if the book made sense, is a stupid way to go about this.

I know, I know, the bible is a complex book and only APPEARS to be horse shit when looked at incorrectly. You can say the exact same thing about ANYTHING, so you’ll understand if that argument is less than convincing to me. [/quote]

Oh brother. There are thousands of books outside the bible. You’re just being lazy…[/quote]

Like the ones Forlife listed, for example? What exactly is your point here?[/quote]

Sure you could check those books out as well…
My point is simply this. You want God to be obvious to you in a way you’ll get with out you having to lift a finger to do it. On the other hand, billions of people already believe in God and have a relationship with him with out Him having to do anything special for them.

If you want to know there is volumes of information. There is so much material out there that if a single person dedicated his life to studying only that then it would take a thousand life spans to take it all in.
Hell, if you were really into archaeology you could go to the Holy Land and participate in one of many digs. You can go Israel, France, Portugal, Italy, etc. All these places where significant religious events have occurred. You could study numerology and observe historical cycles and how they coinside with Biblical numerology. And that’s just a shred of the academic stuff. You can drive to your local library and check out a pickup truck full of books on faith, faith and reason, faith and science, Religions of the world, etc. You can drive to a number of churches in your area and discuss all your questions with a pastor, I am sure most of them would be happy to speak to you.
Have you done any of that? No.
You saw a movie and a speech, and didn’t “feel” anything, that’s it.
It seems pretty clear you’ve spent more time studying atheist propaganda than you have regarding faith of God.[/quote]

Again with the whole “the information is there and it all makes sense if you really think about it!” to which I will once again respond - you can say the EXACT SAME THING about ANYTHING. No matter how convoluted and ridiculous something looks, if you’re willing to make the mental jumps for it, you can MAKE it make sense.

It’s not about God being obvious to me. He’s not obvious period! It seems rather convenient that when the bible makes absolutely no sense, it’s a metaphor. For what you may ask? Who the fuck knows, it’s so vague and unrelated that you already need the answer to “figure it out”. But when the bible makes sense, it’s literal. The problem here is, no two people agree on which parts are metaphorical and which are literal because God never actually says if he is being literal or metaphorical, that’s just you CHOOSING to interpret it as such so it fits your world view. Are you God’s messenger? Is your interpretation correct while everyone is misreading it?

There was a time when the entire bible was taken literally by nearly everyone. The more man kind learned about the world, the more “metaphorical” the bible became. Will the bible be 99% metaphorical 100 years from now?

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]kamui wrote:

[quote]
Not to mention you faggots imprisoned Galileo and feared the general public’s acquisition of knowledge. Grats on impeding our civilization’s progress and advancement in technology, science, and equality for 2000 years. [/quote]

are you really suggesting that “civilization’s progress and advancement in technology, science and equality” would have been greater if Constantine never converted to christianity ?

seriously ?[/quote]

I do believe he did suggest just that.

Folks without at least a basic, rudimentary education in history do NOT belong on this forum. It is an indispensable asset and without it you’re just a 13 year old kid in shorts and flip-flops showing up to try out for the Green Bay Packers in July training camp.[/quote]

I suppose I should have made a new paragraph seeing as how it’s impossible to realize the fact that Galileo was alive 400 years ago which is only like what 1600 years difference from 2000 years so there’s absolutely no way i could have been talking about anything else oops sorry.

In all seriousness, no, that’s not what I was saying.

I’m saying if the Church hadn’t tried to quell knowledge that our civilization as whole would be leaps and bounds ahead of where we already are.

Edit: And there’s really no evidence of Constantine converting to christianity. Yes, he was sympathetic to their cause, but it’s too easy to put words into the mouth of a man who’s dead (as he so purportedly converted on his death bed).

There’s so much bull shit regarding Constantine and christianity. Not to mention the fact that the Pope forged a document called “The Donation of Constantine” claiming that Constantine gave the Bishop of Rome territorial sovereignty over papal states around Rome. Which, by the way, goes against like 100% of your teachings in that the papal authority should not own land for political power and gain (heeeyyooooooooo Julius II). Not only was this proved a forgery by Lorenzo Valla (there are no fiefs, nor fiefdoms in the Roman Empire), it was still up-held despite his public disproof of the article through philology.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
C’mon guys, start editing out the massive walls of quoted text, for cryin out loud.[/quote]

I clear it out every 5 or so responses. gimmie a break =p

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]Zooguido wrote:

I’m saying if the Church hadn’t tried to quell knowledge that our civilization as whole would be leaps and bounds ahead of where we already are.[/quote]

You’re certainly entitled to your strictly amateur observations about “What If” scenarios.

Part of what you stated is actually true in my opinion but it must be counterbalanced by the technological/scientific advances that WERE made because of the catalyst of religion.

It’s not a precise mathematical formula.[/quote]

What advances?
http://nobeliefs.com/comments10.htm

I rest my case.

[quote]Zooguido wrote:
I rest my case.[/quote]

Just look at all that horizontal progress! That’s linear advancement, son!

-the “darkness of the dark” ages has been considerably re-evaluted by current historiography. Read Duby, Legoff, Huinzinga.
-the “darkness of the dark ages” is mainly due to the barbarian invasions, not to the spread of Christianity. If anything the Church (and its monks) contributed to save what could be saved of the Roman heritage. Starting with roman language and law.
-if your graphical chart was remotely fair, the Renaissance would be noted as “Christian Renaissance”.

now, if you really want to play uchronic games… what, in your opinion, would have occured without the so-called “christian dark ages” ?
a Tengri’s Followers Age of enlightement ?