Why Did God Create......

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:
TigerTime makes a fair point. The bible doesn’t specifically say which laws and ordinances in the Mosaic law were fulfilled in Christ, and which continued to apply after Christ.

[/quote]

Yes it does. However, one must read and understand the Old AND New Testaments.

In some places it is expressly addressed. In others it is clearly implicit. But it’s there. Plain as day.

[/quote]

I’ve read, and have a fair understanding of, both the old and new testaments. And I disagree that it is there, as plain as day.

What about the examples I mentioned? Is tithing still literally 10% or not? The new testament never specifies, and Christian churches disagree on this. How about observing the sabbath day? Did you read the passages I provided, and do you see why there could be some confusion?

[quote]TigerTime wrote:
To which I would say if God’s rules only apply if given directly to you then nothing in the bible applies to us. Or, at least not to me personally, perhaps God has come to you personally and told you what you can and cannot do. [/quote]

The covenent of Mt. Sinai was a contract between Jewish people and G-d. Since you are not Jewish, said contract does not have direct bearing on you, just like the contract sitting on my desk between two oil companies has no bearing on you.

Now, there are parts of the Torah that do apply to all people, most notably the Laws of Noah (which are effectively the 10 Commandments (less Shabbos, and plus a requirement to establish a fair government and courts of law).

[quote]

I do find it strange though, that God cares about people pretending their clothes are 100% silk so much that he outright bans all mixed fiber clothing. Not saying this itself is an argument against the bible, but to me it sounds suspiciously like one person with a very strong preference trying to use God as justification to enact his owns ludicrous rules[/quote]

Perhaps, but you are reading this mitzvah grossly out of context, and you don’t seem the type to study the Talmud (nor should you).

Gentile readers of the Torah (the “old testament”) are largely unaware that the written law represented in the Bible is only a partial explaination . It’s essentially an index. Of course it sounds wierd and unclear by itself – it’s an index.

If you are legitimately concerned with the issue of mixed wool/linen, read here:

(Also, to be clear, the only mixed fibres at issue are wool and linen or “shatnez” – I apologize for the silk reference earlier — it is bad to use anologies sometimes — but I did not know the English word “linen.”)

[quote]forlife wrote:
And just a general note: Can people please stop attacking others for their age? It’s an obvious ad hominem tactic that only makes your own position look weak. Attack the actual points all you want. [/quote]

[quote]Zooguido wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]Dbol123 wrote:
isn’t it hilarious how some people, in this day and age, actually believe the bible to be something more than fictional allegories… especially after it’s be refuted time after time[/quote]

Oh good another 20 year old Bible scholar.

You know guys I have to blame the parents for a lot of this ignorance. I think many of them used the TV and computer as baby sitter’s. And now here they are on T Nation all ready to point us in the proper direction.

Okay…yeah it’s funny…but sad too.
[/quote]

You know what’s really funny? The fact that you think it’s impossible to be a good and upstanding human being without the aid of Christianity. The atheists I know are a thousand times more honorable and righteous than any of you on this forum and it’s a pity that you think so highly of yourselves when you don’t know the first thing about compassion, respect, and basic human decency.[/quote]

Oh watch out! His avatar can kick your ass!

[quote]forlife wrote:
But what about keeping the sabbath day holy? [/quote]

If you are not Jewish, Shabbos is not a requirement for you. Period. Here are the Laws that apply to you:

(I’ll make a special note for you that male-male homosexuality is still forbidden.)

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]pat wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

Well, google tells me that these laws aren’t decreed obsolete in the bible and you’re cherry picking which verses to follow… but I doubt that’s what you wanted me to find :wink:

[/quote]

Google nor anyone else told you any such thing, DisingenuousTime. You know it. I know it. Your mom knows it.

The only cherry picker is Tony-the-pseudo-Bible-scholar-Tiger. Your posts and mine reflect that. You have no idea what you’re talking about it; you’re simply arguing because you’re on the internet. You’re throwing stuff up hoping it will stick. You’re certainly more capable talking about medieval Irish history but you’re hopelessly out of your league here.
[/quote]

http://www.atheistperspective.net/p/bible-verses.html << Oh well, you can’t win em all…

Seriously though, you can find any expressed opinion on Google… It just wasn’t a smart move to try and call me out on something than could be shown to be true simply by using Google to find a site that suggests Christians cherry-pick.

I don’t know why you’re trying to make it out as though I came here to argue with you. YOU responded to ME. I’m not forcing you to respond to my comments and you’re free to not respond to me anytime.

This is a very simple game of logic; God has condemned wearing clothes with mixed fibers, eating shellfish, etc. You say these laws are obsolete so I ask you were in the bible these laws have been decreed as such. If this can’t be done (and I don’t think it can) then I guess these things are still banned as far as God’s concerned. [/quote]

Have you ever read the bible? Or are you criticizing something you’ve never read? I am guessing the latter…I had the feeling this was another set up. Another pseudo genius atheist who thinks he found reason in the unreasonable tenet of atheism.
I’ll give you the one main reason atheism is flawed at it’s very core. It posits that something can come from nothing and the things can happen for no reason what so ever. Now, what makes it even more ridiculous with all this belief and trust in science is that there is not a single solitary mircofragment of evidence to even remotely support such a ridiculous notion.

The difference between you and I is that believe in something that is actually possible and you believe in something that is verifiable impossible…Now that you let the cat out of the bag of your true intentions, let’s see how smart you are:
Prove something can come from nothing, as an atheist you MUST believe this to be true or you are not an atheist. It’s that simple…

I won’t be holding my breath.[/quote]

That’s great and all but… where exactly did I say I was an atheist again?

I won’t be holding my breath. ;)[/quote]

You said you don’t believe in God, so, same thing.[/quote]

And where did I say that?[/quote]

“TigerTime wrote:
I cannot believe in any such God.”
[/quote]

You’re deliberately taking this quote out of context. Even within what you’ve quoted anyone can see I’ve added the qualifier “such” as in reference to “such” a God who would eternally punish a man for a finite infraction.

I see now that this conversation is going nowhere. Please, go bother somebody else. [/quote]

I actually took this quote from somebody else who apparently took your quote out of context.
So do you believe in God or not?
You still haven’t answered the question, did you read the bible? But I will take you lack of answer your young age to mean no …And I’ll bother who I please, your not the boss of me. You have the freedom to ignore me. You have the freedom to criticize a book you’ve never read.

But how can you comment intelligently on something you actually have no real knowledge about?

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]JoabSonOfZeruiah wrote:

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
…I don’t want to live forever. It was a horrifying thought as child and it still is.[/quote]
Why?

I have heard some arguments that it would be boring but I think that reasoning does not follow for a few reason. If we were made to by God to take enjoyment in having communion and learning about him than it stands to follow that any other pursuit we humans do in a fallen state to fill the void left by not seeking God would ultimately in the end be unsatisfying. In seeking God that void is filled yet there is always more to learn about him.[/quote]

I explained this in some detail at the beginning of the thread on eight things we will do when we are in heaven, and not get bored.[/quote]
Thanks it was insightful.

[quote]Brother Chris wrote:

[quote]kaaleppi wrote:
If I go a thousand years back I’ll be a pagan. Considering my ancestry that would be Odin, Thor and the rest in Asgard, not Finno-ugric paganism, which is totally different.[/quote]

And, you would be pleasantly surprised that we Christianized all those traditions. :wink:

Anyway, goodnight.[/quote]
Interesting, can you give some examples?

[quote]forlife wrote:
And just a general note: Can people please stop attacking others for their age? It’s an obvious ad hominem tactic that only makes your own position look weak. Attack the actual points all you want. [/quote]

Not only are you not the forum police but you are barely tolerated by respected posters on this site. So sit back and shut up.

[quote]Zooguido wrote:

[quote]ZEB wrote:

[quote]Dbol123 wrote:
isn’t it hilarious how some people, in this day and age, actually believe the bible to be something more than fictional allegories… especially after it’s be refuted time after time[/quote]

Oh good another 20 year old Bible scholar.

You know guys I have to blame the parents for a lot of this ignorance. I think many of them used the TV and computer as baby sitter’s. And now here they are on T Nation all ready to point us in the proper direction.

Okay…yeah it’s funny…but sad too.
[/quote]

You know what’s really funny?[/quote]

A 20 year old Bible scholar is pretty freaking funny junior. You can’t top that.

(Blows Whistle) STRAW MAN! Show me where I ever said anything even remotely close to that? You can’t. And why are you saying it? You don’t know any better. And why don’t you know any better? Because you are little boy who thinks he knows more than he does.

A thousand times huh? I was thinking that maybe it was five or six hundred times. But if you’re sure I’ll take your word on that. Thanks for the info skippy.

I have compassion for you as you face the future and ultimately eternity.

I respect your parents or whomever raised you as I’m sure it took patience.

and

My human decency prevents me from going any further with my analysis.

:slight_smile:

Seriously though you don’t know any of us. All you know is that you don’t like how you and your absolutely nutty posts are being treated. What we have here is a very young and very fragile ego that just took some major hits. You could go post on the “Am I Eating Enough Protein” thread. No?

You okay?

Breath.

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:
TigerTime makes a fair point. The bible doesn’t specifically say which laws and ordinances in the Mosaic law were fulfilled in Christ, and which continued to apply after Christ.

[/quote]

Yes it does. However, one must read and understand the Old AND New Testaments.

In some places it is expressly addressed. In others it is clearly implicit. But it’s there. Plain as day.

Yes, you do have a good understanding of the scriptures which mean you should know that all of Mosaic Law was fulfilled…Not all the commands were Mosaic Law. The commandments remain, it was the law that was fulfilled.

[/quote]

I’ve read, and have a fair understanding of, both the old and new testaments. And I disagree that it is there, as plain as day.

What about the examples I mentioned? Is tithing still literally 10% or not? The new testament never specifies, and Christian churches disagree on this. How about observing the sabbath day? Did you read the passages I provided, and do you see why there could be some confusion?[/quote]

[quote]forlife wrote:

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]forlife wrote:
TigerTime makes a fair point. The bible doesn’t specifically say which laws and ordinances in the Mosaic law were fulfilled in Christ, and which continued to apply after Christ.[/quote]

Yes it does. However, one must read and understand the Old AND New Testaments.

In some places it is expressly addressed. In others it is clearly implicit. But it’s there. Plain as day.[/quote]

I’ve read, and have a fair understanding of, both the old and new testaments. And I disagree that it is there, as plain as day.[/quote]

Forlife, I think you have overestimated your understanding of Scripture if you disagree on this point. That or you are just dishonest in your assessment.

I don’t need to add anything to what Push said. It is there expressly, implicitly, and plain as day. But I know you’re just thirsty for the answer to your question so I will give you some reading material to start you off. Im fairly certain you will not take the time to read this Scripture, especially since you’ve likely read it dozens of times and understand it and all of the corresponding scripture throughout the Old and New. Amiright?

Here is one piece of the puzzle, and I chose it simply because it relates to this topic over and over. He wanted to be sure those foolish Galatians got the message. I’d say it is quite plain. A biblical scholar could likely teach on this subject for a month, but this should whet your appetite:

Galatians 2:21 - 5:14
21 “I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly.”
1 You foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you, before whose eyes Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified ? 2 This is the only thing I want to find out from you: did you receive the Spirit by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith ? 3 Are you so foolish ? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh ? 4 Did you suffer so many things in vain, if indeed it was in vain ? 5 So then, does He who provides you with the Spirit and works miracles among you, do it by the works of the Law, or by hearing with faith ? 6 Even so Abraham BELIEVED GOD, AND IT WAS RECKONED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS.

7 Therefore, be sure that it is those who are of faith who are sons of Abraham. 8 The Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, "All the nations will be blessed in youâ??. 9 So then those who are of faith are blessed with Abraham, the believer. 10 For as many as are of the works of the Law are under a curse ; for it is written, "CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO DOES NOT ABIDE BY ALL THINGS WRITTEN IN THE BOOK OF THE LAW, TO PERFORM THEM 11 Now that no one is justified by the Law before God is evident ; for, “THE RIGHTEOUS MAN SHALL LIVE BY FAITH.” 12 However, the Law is not of faith ; on the contrary, “HE WHO PRACTICES THEM SHALL LIVE BY THEM.” 13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us-for it is written, "CURSED IS EVERYONE WHO HANGS ON A TREE "- 14 in order that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we would receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.

15 Brethren, I speak in terms of human relations : even though it is only a man’s covenant, yet when it has been ratified, no one sets it aside or adds conditions to it. 16 Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does not say, “And to seeds,” as referring to many, but rather to one, “And to your seed,” that is, Christ. 17 What I am saying is this : the Law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise. 18 For if the inheritance is based on law, it is no longer based on a promise ; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise. 19 Why the Law then ? It was added because of transgressions, having been ordained through angels by the agency of a mediator, until the seed would come to whom the promise had been made. 20 Now a mediator is not for one party only; whereas God is only one. 21 Is the Law then contrary to the promises of God ? May it never be! For if a law had been given which was able to impart life, then righteousness would indeed have been based on law. 22 But the Scripture has shut up everyone under sin, so that the promise by faith in Jesus Christ might be given to those who believe. 23 But before faith came, we were kept in custody under the law, being shut up to the faith which was later to be revealed. 24 Therefore the Law has become our tutor to lead us to Christ, so that we may be justified by faith. 25 But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor. 26 For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female ; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29 And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s descendants, heirs according to promise.

Now I say, as long as the heir is a child, he does not differ at all from a slave although he is owner of everything, 2 but he is under guardians and managers until the date set by the father. 3 So also we, while we were children, were held in bondage under the elemental things of the world. 4 But when the fullness of the time came, God sent forth His Son, born of a woman, born under the Law, 5 so that He might redeem those who were under the Law, that we might receive the adoption as sons. 6 Because you are sons, God has sent forth the Spirit of His Son into our hearts, crying, “Abba ! Father !” 7 Therefore you are no longer a slave, but a son ; and if a son, then an heir through God. 8 However at that time, when you did not know God, you were slaves to those which by nature are no gods. 9 But now that you have come to know God, or rather to be known by God, how is it that you turn back again to the weak and worthless elemental things, to which you desire to be enslaved all over again ? 10 You observe days and months and seasons and years. 11 I fear for you, that perhaps I have labored over you in vain.

12 I beg of you, brethren, become as I am, for I also have become as you are. You have done me no wrong ; 13 but you know that it was because of a bodily illness that I preached the gospel to you the first time ; 14 and that which was a trial to you in my bodily condition you did not despise or loathe, but you received me as an angel of God, as Christ Jesus Himself. 15 Where then is that sense of blessing you had? For I bear you witness that, if possible, you would have plucked out your eyes and given them to me. 16 So have I become your enemy by telling you the truth ? 17 They eagerly seek you, not commendably, but they wish to shut you out so that you will seek them. 18 But it is good always to be eagerly sought in a commendable manner, and not only when I am present with you. 19 My children, with whom I am again in labor until Christ is formed in you- 20 but I could wish to be present with you now and to change my tone, for I am perplexed about you.

21 Tell me, you who want to be under law, do you not listen to the law ? 22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the bondwoman and one by the free woman. 23 But the son by the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and the son by the free woman through the promise. 24 This is allegorically speaking, for these women are two covenants : one proceeding from Mount Sinai bearing children who are to be slaves ; she is Hagar. 25 Now this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children. 26 But the Jerusalem above is free ; she is our mother. 27 For it is written, “REJOICE, BARREN WOMAN WHO DOES NOT BEAR ; BREAK FORTH AND SHOUT, YOU WHO ARE NOT IN LABOR ; FOR MORE NUMEROUS ARE THE CHILDREN OF THE DESOLATE THAN OF THE ONE WHO HAS A HUSBAND.” 28 And you brethren, like Isaac, are children of promise. 29 But as at that time he who was born according to the flesh persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, so it is now also. 30 But what does the Scripture say ? “CAST OUT THE BONDWOMAN AND HER SON, FOR THE SON OF THE BONDWOMAN SHALL NOT BE AN HEIR WITH THE SON OF THE FREE WOMAN.” 31 So then, brethren, we are not children of a bondwoman, but of the free woman.

1 It was for freedom that Christ set us free ; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery. 2 Behold I, Paul, say to you that if you receive circumcision, Christ will be of no benefit to you. 3 And I testify again to every man who receives circumcision, that he is under obligation to keep the whole Law. 4 You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by law ; you have fallen from grace. 5 For we through the Spirit, by faith, are waiting for the hope of righteousness. 6 For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, but faith working through love. 7 You were running well ; who hindered you from obeying the truth ? 8 This persuasion did not come from Him who calls you.9 A little leaven leavens the whole lump of dough. 10 I have confidence in you in the Lord that you will adopt no other view ; but the one who is disturbing you will bear his judgment, whoever he is. 11 But I, brethren, if I still preach circumcision, why am I still persecuted ? Then the stumbling block of the cross has been abolished. 12 I wish that those who are troubling you would even mutilate themselves. 13 For you were called to freedom, brethren ; only do not turn your freedom into an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another. 14 For the whole Law is fulfilled in one word, in the statement, “YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.”

Something tells me some smartass is going to twist these words and ask all kinds of interesting and thought provoking questions (ya right), but hey, at least it means you took the time to read it.

more evidence of child abuse in clergy officials

[quote]pushharder wrote:

[quote]TigerTime wrote:

…I’ve already said that assuming these rules only apply if given directly to you, then all of the bible is obsolete…

[/quote]

PittTigerBulllTime, this is the last time I will go over this. If you don’t get it you will be hereby dismissed as far as I am concerned. The shellfish/clothing regulation was given directly to Hebrews and only to Hebrews. I am not Hebrew/Jewish. I am a Gentile. Therefore I am not bound nor ever was to Hebrew civil/ceremonial/hygiene laws.

The fact that I am not nor ever was bound to those laws does not in any shape, form or fashion render the Bible obsolete.

There ARE certain MORAL laws that transcend the Jewish/Gentile distinction and the Old Testament/New Testament partition. Clothing and shellfish regulations are NOT moral laws.

Now I am done with what is so ridiculously elementary that I am completely annoyed I let a squirt whose testicles just dropped into his scrotum a few relatively short moons ago draw me into this.
[/quote]

Although I still maintain you are an ASSHOLE , I do at least give you 2 points for knowing how to retrieve info from the Bible , that being said fuck you :slight_smile:

[quote]Bondslave wrote:

Forlife, I think you have overestimated your understanding of Scripture if you disagree on this point. That or you are just dishonest in your assessment.[/quote]

What’s this? One more person accusing forlife of being disingenuous? Oh my, the list continues to grow.

[quote]Zooguido wrote:
Guess what he also loves?

Little boys and threatening the general populace with eternal damnation for not conforming to the will of God.[/quote]

You seem to have a superficial view of Christianity.

People seem to forget why Christ died. It’s not about damnmation. It’s about forgiveness.

[quote]pittbulll wrote:
I thought the point was that there is none other like God, I guess I do miss the big picture [/quote]

Satan is not like God. God created Satan, Satan didn’t create anything.