It makes them low in analytical ability. Why would one allow a nut-job (not just an immoral liar, nanny-state Democrat running as Republican) near the Commander in Chief position?
Or they could just pull together and vote for a 3rd party…
1 Like
The question was about Trump Supporters. Stop supporting him. No coup needed (he’s not winning anyway).
[quote=“pushharder, post:270, topic:217419, full:true”]
Maybe those high in analytical ability have analyzed this and recognize its excellent potential for failure?[/quote]
If Trump loses, it was a success. Regardless, he will.
Possibly
Possibly
Neither; however, require a coup.
No. But if he ever ordered targeting non-combatants and the use of expanded torture, both he’s promised to cheering supporters (“yay torture and killing women and children!”), I’d hope he would be impeached.
By the way, Zeb’s entire defense of Trump is that he’s conning his supporters with all the stuff I’ve mentioned. So he musn’t think too highly of their analytical abilities either.
Well Hillary is certainly not winning…so who do you think will win?
Then the country failed. Failed to keep a nut-job away from the role of Commander in Chief.
If conning the people means being yourself and saying whatever is on your mind then yes he is conning them big time!
The Democrat, even if it is Hillary.
I see, well we do have a bet that Hillary will never become President. But, I do think if she is indicted before she gets the nomination Trump can be stopped by a different democrat…but certainly not Bernie.