[quote]dday wrote:
I pay to much attention to post count when it comes to someones advice. If a guy with 5 posts comes on and says something I won’t necessarly listen but if someone with 4000 posts says the same thing I tend to listen a little closer.[/quote]
Chances are pretty good that most of the posts were made in the SAMA forum. Not really a good place to go for advice on anything.
[quote]Christine wrote:
Anyone with a join date post 2002 is a loser. I thought that this was common knowledge.[/quote]
You just squeaked in there, didn’t ya?
[quote]Doug Adams wrote:
Christine wrote:
Anyone with a join date post 2002 is a loser. I thought that this was common knowledge.
You just squeaked in there, didn’t ya?
[/quote]
Well, I’m pretty sure that I joined sometime in 2001, but when they redid the site everyones join date changed and the earliest that now shows up is October 2002.
[quote]Christine wrote:
Doug Adams wrote:
Christine wrote:
Anyone with a join date post 2002 is a loser. I thought that this was common knowledge.
You just squeaked in there, didn’t ya?
Well, I’m pretty sure that I joined sometime in 2001, but when they redid the site everyones join date changed and the earliest that now shows up is October 2002.
[/quote]
There are 2 members that show up earlier than 2002.
[quote]Christine wrote:
Doug Adams wrote:
Christine wrote:
Anyone with a join date post 2002 is a loser. I thought that this was common knowledge.
You just squeaked in there, didn’t ya?
Well, I’m pretty sure that I joined sometime in 2001, but when they redid the site everyones join date changed and the earliest that now shows up is October 2002.
[/quote]
Suuuure.
[quote]Christine wrote:
Doug Adams wrote:
Christine wrote:
Anyone with a join date post 2002 is a loser. I thought that this was common knowledge.
You just squeaked in there, didn’t ya?
Well, I’m pretty sure that I joined sometime in 2001, but when they redid the site everyones join date changed and the earliest that now shows up is October 2002.
[/quote]
Ha ha! I have an earlier sign up date than you. 
Post count is a lot like penis size. Or something.
[quote]analog_kid wrote:
Post count is a lot like penis size.[/quote]
Then those guys posting rapid fire on the Ass Worship Thread are basically jelqing?
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
Christine wrote:
Doug Adams wrote:
Christine wrote:
Anyone with a join date post 2002 is a loser. I thought that this was common knowledge.
You just squeaked in there, didn’t ya?
Well, I’m pretty sure that I joined sometime in 2001, but when they redid the site everyones join date changed and the earliest that now shows up is October 2002.
There are 2 members that show up earlier than 2002. [/quote]
If I remember correctly, they each had like, a million kajillion posts each, as well.
I am concerned with what is said rather than the amount being said.
things were waaaaay different back when I joined
[quote]Otep wrote:
LankyMofo wrote:
Christine wrote:
Doug Adams wrote:
Christine wrote:
Anyone with a join date post 2002 is a loser. I thought that this was common knowledge.
You just squeaked in there, didn’t ya?
Well, I’m pretty sure that I joined sometime in 2001, but when they redid the site everyones join date changed and the earliest that now shows up is October 2002.
There are 2 members that show up earlier than 2002.
If I remember correctly, they each had like, a million kajillion posts each, as well.[/quote]
Nah, all their sign up dates were 2/03 I believe. All of the super old threads are like that for some reason.
The 2 I’m talking about only have like 300 and 5000 posts, if I remember correctly.
[quote]LankyMofo wrote:
There are 2 members that show up earlier than 2002. [/quote]
LOL. This sounds like some kind of urban legend stuff.
“I heard one member has post counts that go in reverse.”
I could’ve sworn you were talking about me…2002 join date yet only 400ish posts lol. Anyways, it’s about quality posts, not quantity!
[quote]AngryVader wrote:
Christine wrote:
Doug Adams wrote:
Christine wrote:
Anyone with a join date post 2002 is a loser. I thought that this was common knowledge.
You just squeaked in there, didn’t ya?
Well, I’m pretty sure that I joined sometime in 2001, but when they redid the site everyones join date changed and the earliest that now shows up is October 2002.
Ha ha! I have an earlier sign up date than you. :P[/quote]
I guess that makes you one month less loserish than me.
Where’s that Makavali or whatever guy? He has you all beat.
[quote]malonetd wrote:
LankyMofo wrote:
There are 2 members that show up earlier than 2002.
LOL. This sounds like some kind of urban legend stuff.
“I heard one member has post counts that go in reverse.”[/quote]
Lol, it’s true, I swear!
[quote]Artem wrote:
Where’s that Makavali or whatever guy? He has you all beat.[/quote]
Mak’s goal is to break the all time post record on T-Nation.
[quote]AngryVader wrote:
Artem wrote:
Where’s that Makavali or whatever guy? He has you all beat.
Mak’s goal is to break the all time post record on T-Nation.[/quote]
He gets an F for effort. He should be on this thread like post-contest Zane on a chili dog.
[quote]analog_kid wrote:
AngryVader wrote:
Artem wrote:
Where’s that Makavali or whatever guy? He has you all beat.
Mak’s goal is to break the all time post record on T-Nation.
He gets an F for effort. He should be on this thread like post-contest Zane on a chili dog.
[/quote]
He will. I just don’t think he has gotten to work yet.