[quote]SexMachine wrote:
squating_bear[quote]
This is about the label “conspiracy theorist” itself. Rather than looking at any of your evidence, if it were my style, I could just do like you’ve done and sarcastically bring up Bigfoot, Area 51 etc. etc. and dismiss it.
[/quote]
I brought that up in relation to why I didn’t want to discuss conspiracies about controlled demolition of the WTC towers in a 9/11 conspiracy thread. As I told you there - I’m not interested. It would be good if you could stop asking me about it. Thanks.
[/quote]I’ve only asked you anything about it in direct response to things you said in that thread. And those questions were only posted within that thread. Your welcome.
[quote][quote]
Oh, but before that I also gotta call you an anti-Semite, you know - cuz ALL conspiracy theories have a basis in antisemitism.
[/quote]
I have never called another poster here an “anti-Semite” - not the guy who started a holocaust denial thread, not the white power guy, nor the sockpuppetry - no one. I merely, pointed out the harmful effects of such stuff. Anti-Semitism is just one example. Another: brainwashing most the third world into believing the U.S. is the greatest threat to mankind and so on. That’s a result of deliberate distortion/fabrication of history for political purposes.
[/quote]Ok, I can’t remember you calling anyone an anti-Semite. That appeared to me as the obvious implication of what you posted on “the history of conspiracy theories” - but maybe I misunderstood
[quote][quote]
Then I don’t even have to speak on any of your views of McCarthy, I’ve got something so much bigger - I can now take this to any thread that you post in and discredit you as a hateful kook. See what I did there?
[/quote]
Good for you. I told you, I was talking about 9/11 conspiracy theories about the demolition of the WTC and I will tell you again - I’m not interested.
[/quote]I don’t think you saw what I did there. I was trying to reveal your tactics, which you yourself may not even be aware of (I’m not sure)
You are the one that brings up 9/11 in other threads. You’ve tried it on me before, and in this thread the only reason I posted anything was because you tried it on DarkNinja. Understand what you’ve quoted from me. It’s what you’ve actually done. You bring up 9/11 only in an attempt to discredit people. When you (faultily) perceive someone is chasing you around for an honest debate?
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
I will tell you again - I’m not interested.[/quote]
You’ve actually posted a mirror image of my sarcasm… except you were serious
[quote]squating_bear wrote:
Then I don’t even have to speak on McCarthy [/quote]
If you don’t want to speak on it directly - that’s completely fine. I guess I’ll just have to ‘settle’ for an honest debate over your smear tactics then - that’s even better
Don’t want to debate that neither? Simple. Quit doing it.
When you reach like this I’ve just GOT to smash your fingers…
[quote][quote]
I’m in the process of reading the ‘Soviet Russia’ thread, but I’m not sure why you pointed me their. Maybe I’m not deep enough into the thread to see why, but I hope you don’t have me confused for a Commie.
[/quote]
No, I didn’t confuse you for a Commie. However, you came in here and asked me about my use of the term “Soviet disinfo” and then began questioning how I know what I know and so on. I directed you to someone who would know more about the Soviet Union from within. Part of the process of understanding these things is to learn about history, evaluating sources, critical thinking and so on. If you’re not interested in that then that’s fine.[/quote]
scratches head
[quote]
Part of the process of understanding these things is to learn about history, evaluating sources, critical thinking and so on. If you’re not interested in that then that’s fine.[/quote]
…?
[quote]
I’m in the process of reading the ‘Soviet Russia’ thread[/quote]
Come on man, focus. I know you’re better than all this - I’ve seen ya