Where's Professor X?

Off Topic
161

[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
rainjack wrote:
texasguy1 wrote:
rainjack wrote:
Rockscar wrote:
RJ- You are better than this…stop sinking to their level.

JB- Calm down…Get over it and grow up a bit. Stop attacking him and making assumptions about people. He’s a father with kids and owns his home and business, so telling him to get a life is kind of silly coming from you isn’t it?

Texas kid:…double get over it…you’re only here because you don’t like RJ from your flame war a while back.

Make up or I’ll be crackin some skulls in here!

Relax. I’m just feeding these idiots more rope. Not that they need it, but it is fun.

Yeah but you look like the dumb ass. Is this a sneaky flaming technique or did you forget that you are not supposed to hang yourself with the “noose”?

Jesus Poodle Nuts. Sue Sul Ross for your tuition. Your education must have been more worthless than it sounds.

The more rope I feed you - the more you post. The more you and your twink-friends post, the more you prove yourself to be twinks. You can’t help yourselves.

I think you pretty much speak for yourself here poodle nuts. You are also coming across like you have some sort of unresolved homosexual issues. Put the rope down please.

rainjack wrote:

Between your poodles “stones” and the nickname you gave me I see whats on your mind.

My daughter’s poodle. My daughter’s poodle.

Do they not teach reading comprehension in 4th grade any more?

Please tell me what is on my mind. I’d love to get your take on my mental/psychological state.

When you cut them out - it is pretty easy to see how big, or small the testicles are. You are not a very bright kid, are you? Have you never castrated anything before?

I mention dog nuts is passing, and you mesmerized by the mere mention of the term.

What does that say about your mental condition?

Yeah. Yeah. I had a whole line of thinking thing going on - and well - I didn’t make it back to finish the thought.

[/quote]

Learn to use the quote function. Your post is unintelligible.

Do you have a problem with me having homosexual issues? Why do you think I have homosexual issues? Because I referenced poodle nuts? Please…tell me how you connect those dots.

It would also be interesting to know why you are so concerned with my sexuality.

Why would I put the rope down when you are doing exactly as I said you would do?

162

[quote]rainjack wrote:
texasguy1 wrote:
rainjack wrote:
texasguy1 wrote:
rainjack wrote:
Rockscar wrote:
RJ- You are better than this…stop sinking to their level.

JB- Calm down…Get over it and grow up a bit. Stop attacking him and making assumptions about people. He’s a father with kids and owns his home and business, so telling him to get a life is kind of silly coming from you isn’t it?

Texas kid:…double get over it…you’re only here because you don’t like RJ from your flame war a while back.

Make up or I’ll be crackin some skulls in here!

Relax. I’m just feeding these idiots more rope. Not that they need it, but it is fun.

Yeah but you look like the dumb ass. Is this a sneaky flaming technique or did you forget that you are not supposed to hang yourself with the “noose”?

Jesus Poodle Nuts. Sue Sul Ross for your tuition. Your education must have been more worthless than it sounds.

The more rope I feed you - the more you post. The more you and your twink-friends post, the more you prove yourself to be twinks. You can’t help yourselves.

I think you pretty much speak for yourself here poodle nuts. You are also coming across like you have some sort of unresolved homosexual issues. Put the rope down please.

rainjack wrote:

Between your poodles “stones” and the nickname you gave me I see whats on your mind.

My daughter’s poodle. My daughter’s poodle.

Do they not teach reading comprehension in 4th grade any more?

Please tell me what is on my mind. I’d love to get your take on my mental/psychological state.

When you cut them out - it is pretty easy to see how big, or small the testicles are. You are not a very bright kid, are you? Have you never castrated anything before?

I mention dog nuts is passing, and you mesmerized by the mere mention of the term.

What does that say about your mental condition?

Yeah. Yeah. I had a whole line of thinking thing going on - and well - I didn’t make it back to finish the thought.

Learn to use the quote function. Your post is unintelligible.

Do you have a problem with me having homosexual issues? Why do you think I have homosexual issues? Because I referenced poodle nuts? Please…tell me how you connect those dots.

It would also be interesting to know why you are so concerned with my sexuality.

Why would I put the rope down when you are doing exactly as I said you would do?
[/quote]

Poodle nuts, the post doesn’t make sense because you are not making sense. Does Sul Ross just let anybody in?

No, dog balls are not making you look gay. Your endless references to homosexuality and “twinks” are however. I really wasn’t sure what a twink was so I googled it out of curiosity and will never forgive you for inviting me in to that section of your mind. Fortunately the site descriptions on the search page were enough that I didn’t click to enter your apparent fantasies.

I am shocked you can’t see just how stupid you are coming across with all this rope lending (though you do make a mighty fine west texan, passing out your rope and all. Just don’t expect any sexual favors you silly twink lover you). You started off discussing poodle nuts and attempting to belittle a guy for never having castrated an animal, then you stated “east” texans know nothing about Texas history though all of Texas history worth learning took place in east Texas, then you started dishing out your knowledge of the homosexual subculture as if it were making others look bad.

Poodle nuts, take a break, eat a big breakfast, read a book or two and then come back and read through this thread.

163

Man if thats rainjack in the bottom left of that book cover, that’s one jacked accountant lol.

164

[quote]CrewPierce wrote:
Man if thats rainjack in the bottom left of that book cover, that’s one jacked accountant lol.[/quote]

Not the stereotypical pencil necked bean counter.

165

[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
Poodle nuts, the post doesn’t make sense because you are not making sense. Does Sul Ross just let anybody in?

No, dog balls are not making you look gay. Your endless references to homosexuality and “twinks” are however. I really wasn’t sure what a twink was so I googled it out of curiosity and will never forgive you for inviting me in to that section of your mind. Fortunately the site descriptions on the search page were enough that I didn’t click to enter your apparent fantasies.

I am shocked you can’t see just how stupid you are coming across with all this rope lending (though you do make a mighty fine west texan, passing out your rope and all. Just don’t expect any sexual favors you silly twink lover you). You started off discussing poodle nuts and attempting to belittle a guy for never having castrated an animal, then you stated “east” texans know nothing about Texas history though all of Texas history worth learning took place in east Texas, then you started dishing out your knowledge of the homosexual subculture as if it were making others look bad.

Poodle nuts, take a break, eat a big breakfast, read a book or two and then come back and read through this thread. [/quote]

Yet more rope for you. This is getting a little boring. I hate being right so often.

Just once, I would like to see some of you and your little friends display just a little originality.

But my questions to you remain unanswered: Why are you so concerned about my sexuality? Why are you scared of my sexuality?

FYI - twink is a term I learned about right here on T-Nation. Look up some old Atomic Dogs.

You can’t help yourself, can you?

Now - how about answering a question, or two? You seem to have a wealth of knowledge about me - but you can’t seem to tell me why I am of such concern to you.

166

[quote]rainjack wrote:
texasguy1 wrote:
Poodle nuts, the post doesn’t make sense because you are not making sense. Does Sul Ross just let anybody in?

No, dog balls are not making you look gay. Your endless references to homosexuality and “twinks” are however. I really wasn’t sure what a twink was so I googled it out of curiosity and will never forgive you for inviting me in to that section of your mind. Fortunately the site descriptions on the search page were enough that I didn’t click to enter your apparent fantasies.

I am shocked you can’t see just how stupid you are coming across with all this rope lending (though you do make a mighty fine west texan, passing out your rope and all. Just don’t expect any sexual favors you silly twink lover you). You started off discussing poodle nuts and attempting to belittle a guy for never having castrated an animal, then you stated “east” texans know nothing about Texas history though all of Texas history worth learning took place in east Texas, then you started dishing out your knowledge of the homosexual subculture as if it were making others look bad.

Poodle nuts, take a break, eat a big breakfast, read a book or two and then come back and read through this thread.

Yet more rope for you. This is getting a little boring. I hate being right so often.

Just once, I would like to see some of you and your little friends display just a little originality.

But my questions to you remain unanswered: Why are you so concerned about my sexuality? Why are you scared of my sexuality?

FYI - twink is a term I learned about right here on T-Nation. Look up some old Atomic Dogs.

You can’t help yourself, can you?

Now - how about answering a question, or two? You seem to have a wealth of knowledge about me - but you can’t seem to tell me why I am of such concern to you.

[/quote]

Poodle nuts, I can see you are backing out of this one as gracefully as you can. You are asking me to repeat the reasons I’ve already mentioned as to why you are a dumb ass, then call the thread a little boring. I still find you highly entertaining.

We can go ahead and end it at animal castrations, your twink fetish, your own ignorance about our state, your lack of reading comprehension and your inability to see how retarded have been through out the thread if you’d like. But it is just hard to let it go because every new post you make is golden.

I mean in this one, you even lead us to infer that you are homosexual and then get defensive about it before anyone lends their opinion on your choice:

(rainjack wrote:

But my questions to you remain unanswered: Why are you so concerned about my sexuality? Why are you scared of my sexuality?)

I hear West Texas can be a rough place for that.

Do people actually pay you to manage their finances? I understand your area is sparsely populated, but surely there are more intelligent accountants around. I would think most people would tuck tail and make the 300 mile minimum drive if not. But your neighbors probably all share your gene pool anyways so maybe not.

167

[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
Poodle nuts, I can see you are backing out of this one as gracefully as you can. You are asking me to repeat the reasons I’ve already mentioned as to why you are a dumb ass, then call the thread a little boring. I still find you highly entertaining.

We can go ahead and end it at animal castrations, your twink fetish, your own ignorance about our state, your lack of reading comprehension and your inability to see how retarded have been through out the thread if you’d like. But it is just hard to let it go because every new post you make is golden.

I mean in this one, you even lead us to infer that you are homosexual and then get defensive about it before anyone lends their opinion on your choice:

(rainjack wrote:

But my questions to you remain unanswered: Why are you so concerned about my sexuality? Why are you scared of my sexuality?)

I hear West Texas can be a rough place for that.

Do people actually pay you to manage their finances? I understand your area is sparsely populated, but surely there are more intelligent accountants around. I would think most people would tuck tail and make the 300 mile minimum drive if not. But your neighbors probably all share your gene pool anyways so maybe not.

[/quote]

Oh - I am not backing out of anything. I just said you are making it boring. Predictability is boring. You are predictable.

Now - before you start whining any more about my “being defensive” - I am not. You are the one that seems to be concerned with my sexuality. I am just asking why my sexuality means so much to you.

My knowledge of Texas History is not even an issue here. Neither are testicles. The use of the term “twink” is not an issue. My ability as an accountant, or lack thereof, has only been talked about by you, as is my choice of college.

All of these issues are things you say make me gay, or stupid, or embarrassing, or whatever. I am fine with you thinking I am gay. I am not defensive about it. I am fine with you thinking I am stupid. I am okay with you thinking that I am embarrassing myself.

My question is the same question you have ignored twice.

Why am I of such concern to you? Why does my equating one of your fellow Abercrombie collar poppers with a castrated poodle cause you such dispair?

As I said, you are nothing if not predictable. You will ignore these questions. You will undoubtedly make yet another sophomoric attempt at insulting me which anyone with a functioning brainstem could see is not working for you.

You see - for insults to be effective, the receiver has to give a shit about what is being said.

But you won’t see that. You will continue to post up your brand of lameness. You can’t help it. And you will continue to be worried about my sexuality, my clientele, my education, and my knowledge of Texas History. Why?

168

Jackie boy,

Don’t ask for originality and then request an extension of the conversation you are bored with. Not only are you lacking in reading comprehension, ridiculously pretentious about animal castrations, homosexual, ignorant yet pretentious about our state as well but you are attempting to engineer your own boredom as well which is a little weird.

“My knowledge of Texas History is not even an issue here. Neither are testicles. The use of the term “twink” is not an issue.”… uh… have you read your own posts poodle nuts?

“I am fine with you thinking I am gay. I am not defensive about it.”

That is a big step buddy. Congratulations.

“As I said, you are nothing if not predictable. You will ignore these questions. You will undoubtedly make yet another sophomoric attempt at insulting me which anyone with a functioning brainstem could see is not working for you.”

A pretty piss poor attempt at turning the flow of the conversation poodle nuts. You are moron with your dog balls. And you are right, your moronic insight in to “normal” life is pretty predictable. Calling you on it is par for the course. You own posts are insulting yourself dumb ass.

And what the fuck does a brainstem have to do with thought patterns?

Here poodle nuts:

Brain Stem: Underneath the limbic system is the brain stem. This structure is responsible for basic vital life functions such as breathing, heartbeat, and blood pressure. Scientists say that this is the “simplest” part of human brains because animals’ entire brains, such as reptiles (who appear early on the evolutionary scale) resemble our brain stem.

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/kinser/Structure1.html#brainstem

Maybe analyzing logical conversations with your brain stem is your problem.

169

lolol

so castration is original? and your way of putting down people? Sorrrrrryyyy but unless you say your a vet, or just joking anything you say is like a retard talking. I still bust out laughing when I think about somebody who would seriuosly type that post.

After that post I can’t believe anybody would think your somebody worth going back and forth with.

Even your friends like zap only like you because of that good ass thats easy to find.

170

[quote]Bauer97 wrote:
I have often had the thought, and it has often been reinforced, that the bigger a bad-ass somebody pretends to be on the internet, the bigger the vagina they are in reality. It’s called compensation.
.[/quote]

I’m the other way around, i’m such a prick in real life i try to even out my carma by being nice on this site.

171

[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
Jackie boy,

Don’t ask for originality and then request an extension of the conversation you are bored with. Not only are you lacking in reading comprehension, ridiculously pretentious about animal castrations, homosexual, ignorant yet pretentious about our state as well but you are attempting to engineer your own boredom as well which is a little weird.

“My knowledge of Texas History is not even an issue here. Neither are testicles. The use of the term “twink” is not an issue.”… uh… have you read your own posts poodle nuts?

“I am fine with you thinking I am gay. I am not defensive about it.”

That is a big step buddy. Congratulations.

“As I said, you are nothing if not predictable. You will ignore these questions. You will undoubtedly make yet another sophomoric attempt at insulting me which anyone with a functioning brainstem could see is not working for you.”

A pretty piss poor attempt at turning the flow of the conversation poodle nuts. You are moron with your dog balls. And you are right, your moronic insight in to “normal” life is pretty predictable. Calling you on it is par for the course. You own posts are insulting yourself dumb ass.

And what the fuck does a brainstem have to do with thought patterns?

Here poodle nuts:

Brain Stem: Underneath the limbic system is the brain stem. This structure is responsible for basic vital life functions such as breathing, heartbeat, and blood pressure. Scientists say that this is the “simplest” part of human brains because animals’ entire brains, such as reptiles (who appear early on the evolutionary scale) resemble our brain stem.

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/kinser/Structure1.html#brainstem

Maybe analyzing logical conversations with your brain stem is your problem.

[/quote]

I’ll leave it to you to figure out just how stupid your little brainstem tangent is. But suffice it to say - with out a functioning brainstem, you are dead. Follow the dots, dipshit - they lead somewhere.

Now - you have failed to answer a question for a third consecutive time. Maybe you are confused by all the words. Maybe your infatuation with me will not allow you to answer. Maybe you are just this fucking stupid. but I wll ask for a 4th time.

Why do you care? Why does this matter to you so much that you would check this post continuously to see if you have something to reply to?

Why can’t you just answer the question?

Like I said - you are nothing if not predictable.

172

[quote]rainjack wrote:
texasguy1 wrote:
Jackie boy,

Don’t ask for originality and then request an extension of the conversation you are bored with. Not only are you lacking in reading comprehension, ridiculously pretentious about animal castrations, homosexual, ignorant yet pretentious about our state as well but you are attempting to engineer your own boredom as well which is a little weird.

“My knowledge of Texas History is not even an issue here. Neither are testicles. The use of the term “twink” is not an issue.”… uh… have you read your own posts poodle nuts?

“I am fine with you thinking I am gay. I am not defensive about it.”

That is a big step buddy. Congratulations.

“As I said, you are nothing if not predictable. You will ignore these questions. You will undoubtedly make yet another sophomoric attempt at insulting me which anyone with a functioning brainstem could see is not working for you.”

A pretty piss poor attempt at turning the flow of the conversation poodle nuts. You are moron with your dog balls. And you are right, your moronic insight in to “normal” life is pretty predictable. Calling you on it is par for the course. You own posts are insulting yourself dumb ass.

And what the fuck does a brainstem have to do with thought patterns?

Here poodle nuts:

Brain Stem: Underneath the limbic system is the brain stem. This structure is responsible for basic vital life functions such as breathing, heartbeat, and blood pressure. Scientists say that this is the “simplest” part of human brains because animals’ entire brains, such as reptiles (who appear early on the evolutionary scale) resemble our brain stem.

http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/bb/kinser/Structure1.html#brainstem

Maybe analyzing logical conversations with your brain stem is your problem.

I’ll leave it to you to figure out just how stupid your little brainstem tangent is. But suffice it to say - with out a functioning brainstem, you are dead. Follow the dots, dipshit - they lead somewhere.

Now - you have failed to answer a question for a third consecutive time. Maybe you are confused by all the words. Maybe your infatuation with me will not allow you to answer. Maybe you are just this fucking stupid. but I wll ask for a 4th time.

Why do you care? Why does this matter to you so much that you would check this post continuously to see if you have something to reply to?

Why can’t you just answer the question?

Like I said - you are nothing if not predictable.
[/quote]

“I’ll leave it to you to figure out just how stupid your little brainstem tangent is. But suffice it to say - with out a functioning brainstem, you are dead. Follow the dots, dipshit - they lead somewhere.”

brain stem recovery mode there poodle nuts?

"Why do you care? Why does this matter to you so much that you would check this post continuously to see if you have something to reply to? "

Jackie, why did you make this post? Maybe a little introspection is called for here? And who is predictable? So far I’ve been having fun playing on your predictability of pretentious ignorance preventing you from seeing your own self rope feed as it were.

Why do I keep coming back? To clown you. Why do you keep coming back Jackie? Nobody likes to be clowned and you apparantly don’t care what I have to say… I’m sensing more poodle nut stupidity.

173

[quote]Airtruth wrote:
lolol

so castration is original? and your way of putting down people? Sorrrrrryyyy but unless you say your a vet, or just joking anything you say is like a retard talking. I still bust out laughing when I think about somebody who would seriuosly type that post.

After that post I can’t believe anybody would think your somebody worth going back and forth with.

Even your friends like zap only like you because of that good ass thats easy to find.[/quote]

Show me another thread on this site that references castrated dogs. If there are any - there are very, very few. You do know what original means right? I got your panties twisted, and you still can’t quit thinking about it - by your own admission. Yeah, I’m a fucking idiot - a fucking idiot that has gotten in your head.

I’m not worth going back and forth with - but here you are going at it with me again, and this is after you said you were done.

I guess standing by your word is just a concept for you, huh? Sadly - you are not that much different from your little friends on here.

174

[quote]rainjack wrote:

Yet more rope for you. This is getting a little boring. I hate being right so often.

[/quote]

That is probably why you need me to teach you humility…

:slight_smile:

175

[quote]texasguy1 wrote:

“I’ll leave it to you to figure out just how stupid your little brainstem tangent is. But suffice it to say - with out a functioning brainstem, you are dead. Follow the dots, dipshit - they lead somewhere.”

brain stem recovery mode there poodle nuts?

"Why do you care? Why does this matter to you so much that you would check this post continuously to see if you have something to reply to? "

Jackie, why did you make this post? Maybe a little introspection is called for here? And who is predictable? So far I’ve been having fun playing on your predictability of pretentious ignorance preventing you from seeing your own self rope feed as it were.

Why do I keep coming back? To clown you. Why do you keep coming back Jackie? Nobody likes to be clowned and you apparantly don’t care what I have to say… I’m sensing more poodle nut stupidity.
[/quote]

Nice try. You just don’t have the capacity to pull it off with any conviction.

Are you just affraid? This isn’t the first time you have hijacked a thread in an attempt to be close to me. I think it’s like the 4th or 5th. If this were an isolated incident - I probably would not be looking for an answer. But you have a documented history of stalking me. Seeing as how you are too scared to answer - I will tell you why I think you are so infatuated with me.

My thinking is that you are lonely. You have issues with the public in general, and would never act like this were the keyboard not separating you from real life. You have never been in a real fight, and the closest you can get to that without risking bodily harm is internet warriorism.

I think you are a stubborn little fuck that will just keep going until you are bored, or who ever the object of your affection is quits.

I think you have issues with being wrong. I think you have huge issues with being embarrassed at what you perceive to be your own game and when you get cornered, and people laugh at you even a little bit - you take it personal, and attack back.

You are of the age that you think you need to prove your adult hood, and you pick on what you see as the top bull in the pasture to impress others.

Don’t think so? You entered this thread specifically to engage me. You have yet to comment on ProfX and when addressed by others, you either give a short response, or ignore them completely. Your entire focus is on trying to better me.

Sadly, you fall short and are reduced to sophomoric insults. You were the first one to bring up homosexuality. Go ahead - check the posts. But when I don’t bite on it like all of your college kid friends do, you have to change tactics.

My sexuality bothers you so deeply because I don’t care. You have tried just about every insult you can, yet I don’t take the bait.

Now - please try and insult me with something besides homosexuality, my lack of Texas knowledge, my college, my ability as a professional, or whatever else you have attempted to use. I really don’t mind flame warring with you as I have nothing to do today - for for crying out loud, at least make a fucking effort.

176

[quote]orion wrote:
rainjack wrote:

Yet more rope for you. This is getting a little boring. I hate being right so often.

That is probably why you need me to teach you humility…

:slight_smile:

[/quote]

If you have never been wrong, and I have never been wrong - how is that going to work?

Maybe you come to Texas, and learn shit my way - then I come to Austria, and you realize that was right all along.

Do they drink bourbon in Austria?

177

This thread made my lunch break a little better. I’ve countless helpful posts from Rainjack, and funny enough, the other people flaming i can only remember from criticising RJ. If you can get anonymous people you’ve never met to feel so strongly about you, you must be doing something right.

178

[quote]rainjack wrote:
texasguy1 wrote:

“I’ll leave it to you to figure out just how stupid your little brainstem tangent is. But suffice it to say - with out a functioning brainstem, you are dead. Follow the dots, dipshit - they lead somewhere.”

brain stem recovery mode there poodle nuts?

"Why do you care? Why does this matter to you so much that you would check this post continuously to see if you have something to reply to? "

Jackie, why did you make this post? Maybe a little introspection is called for here? And who is predictable? So far I’ve been having fun playing on your predictability of pretentious ignorance preventing you from seeing your own self rope feed as it were.

Why do I keep coming back? To clown you. Why do you keep coming back Jackie? Nobody likes to be clowned and you apparantly don’t care what I have to say… I’m sensing more poodle nut stupidity.

Nice try. You just don’t have the capacity to pull it off with any conviction.

Are you just affraid? This isn’t the first time you have hijacked a thread in an attempt to be close to me. I think it’s like the 4th or 5th. If this were an isolated incident - I probably would not be looking for an answer. But you have a documented history of stalking me. Seeing as how you are too scared to answer - I will tell you why I think you are so infatuated with me.

My thinking is that you are lonely. You have issues with the public in general, and would never act like this were the keyboard not separating you from real life. You have never been in a real fight, and the closest you can get to that without risking bodily harm is internet warriorism.

I think you are a stubborn little fuck that will just keep going until you are bored, or who ever the object of your affection is quits.

I think you have issues with being wrong. I think you have huge issues with being embarrassed at what you perceive to be your own game and when you get cornered, and people laugh at you even a little bit - you take it personal, and attack back.

You are of the age that you think you need to prove your adult hood, and you pick on what you see as the top bull in the pasture to impress others.

Don’t think so? You entered this thread specifically to engage me. You have yet to comment on ProfX and when addressed by others, you either give a short response, or ignore them completely. Your entire focus is on trying to better me.

Sadly, you fall short and are reduced to sophomoric insults. You were the first one to bring up homosexuality. Go ahead - check the posts. But when I don’t bite on it like all of your college kid friends do, you have to change tactics.

My sexuality bothers you so deeply because I don’t care. You have tried just about every insult you can, yet I don’t take the bait.

Now - please try and insult me with something besides homosexuality, my lack of Texas knowledge, my college, my ability as a professional, or whatever else you have attempted to use. I really don’t mind flame warring with you as I have nothing to do today - for for crying out loud, at least make a fucking effort.

[/quote]

“Nice try. You just don’t have the capacity to pull it off with any conviction.”

You are on the defensive here poodle nuts.

That sums up not only the above quote but your whole post and this entire thread.

Capacitate that brain stem.

and for your information, you were the one throwing gayness and twinks around. Maybe you should be re-reading posts before making accusations poodle nuts.

179

[quote]texasguy1 wrote:
rainjack wrote:
“Nice try. You just don’t have the capacity to pull it off with any conviction.”

You are on the defensive here poodle nuts. [/quote]

What do I have to be defensive about? You are the one that is ducking questions. We call that dodging the issue. You are an expert.

Do you even know what logic is? I mean - you can google terms you are infatuated with but things you need to know - you have no clue. Just stick to insults, and try and stay away from actual arguments.

Oh really? Here, scooter - since you can’t seem to navigate the quote function, or the back button with any proficiency - allow me to quote your first post in this thread:

[b][i]Damn Jackie!

Ya’ll certainly shared quite a bit of manlove didn’t you! I’ve only seen that much emotion in girls sticking up for their bf’s so far! You old fogies really teach us something new every day.[/b][/i]

Not only does this prove your first post in this thread implied I am gay - it goes on to prove that your sole reason for entering this thread was to try and get close to me.

I don’t have a problem with you having a crush on me - but just be honest. But what would you know about honesty?

180

This thread is amusing, but, at the same time, it’s also pretty fucking pathetic.

It’s pathetic that we have a “veteran” member of this board behaving like a complete ass clown and, for some reason, being totally oblivious to it and thinking that not only are his points spot on and clever, but that he’s actually winning this pissing contest with a member no one really cares much for, anyway.

It’s pathetic that no one has just told texasguy1 to shut the fuck up already, seeing as how rainjack lacks the class to simply do so and return the favor.

It’s also pretty pathetic when you think of it as a 40-year old guy spending his day off arguing with a 20-year old over the Internet about which one is a faggier, twink-ier loser.

None of us are rooting for either of you - we are too busy cringing at your ridiculous attempts at one-upping the other with forced wit.

That being said, I’ve got texasguy1 in the lead by a hair.