Final thought: The reason I typed out all of this stuff in my previous 3 or 4 posts is to highlight my view that there is literally no way that Romney can handle this situation in a “better” fashion than Obama, which is what you guys have been trying to perpetuate. There won’t be this epiphany, and “the South will rise again” type of shit; what will happen is the Romney gets the US into a war or two,[/quote]
Liberals like yourself usually don’t fully understand that it is “weakness that is provocative.” Obama reducing our military, as he’s promised to do if given a second term, can only encourage our enemies to rise up against us.
The best way to prevent a war is to be ready and able to fight. That is human nature from the big guy down the street that no one picks on to having a large and capable military.
Obama is out to lunch on this and just about every other sound policy that has made America great. And I do think Romney would be far better than Obama. But quite honestly I think that just about anyone with average intelligence who actually believes in America would be better than Obama.[/quote]
“Liberals like myself”. What’s a liberal man, explain to me.[/quote]
The best example is YOU! Know nothing air heads who blame Bush and just can’t find any reason to condemn a President who has ruled over the worst economy since the Great Depression.
Could be because Obama has destroyed all the jobs.
-100 million people on some sort of government support
-45 million people on food stamps
-Unemployment over 8% for 43 straight months (a record since the great depression)
-Adding 4 trillion to the national debt. He beat what that nasty Bush added in only four years time!
Obama is an economic train wreck kid! You don’t see it because you’re a liberal.
The point that you’re missing is that calling me a “liberal” is not an insult. I don’t feel insulted being called a “liberal”.
You haven’t even defined what a “liberal” is. So far, all I can tell is a liberal is someone who wants a sensible foreign policy and not retardedly outrageous military spending.[/quote]
You don’t have to feel insulted. You just have to know that what you say is diminished by what you are. Also, it’s sort of common knowledge around here that when someone gives you say 35 reasons why something is good, or bad that you should at least try to refute them. All of your endless ranting proves nothing other than you’re an inexperienced kid who has stars in his eye’s. One more out of touch idealist. The kind that elected Obama.
You don’t have to feel insulted. You just have to know that what you say is diminished by what you are. Also, it’s sort of common knowledge around here that when someone gives you say 35 reasons why something is good, or bad that you should at least try to refute them. All of your endless ranting proves nothing other than you’re an inexperienced kid who has stars in his eye’s. One more out of touch idealist. The kind that elected Obama.
In short, you’re not very good at this.[/quote]
I like people like you because you are completely open and forthcoming about your views. It’s helpful when people don’t try and hide behind a facade pretending to know what they are talking about, but just expose their ignorance openly.
What is a liberal, once again? “You” doesn’t define it.
What’s your obsession with John Stewart? I don’t even watch TV, much less wasting my time on politically oriented humou. Something about John Stewart makes people like you rage. It’s hilarious when you really look at it because I’ve never seen someone get so mad over Bill O’Reilly for example.
You don’t have to feel insulted. You just have to know that what you say is diminished by what you are. Also, it’s sort of common knowledge around here that when someone gives you say 35 reasons why something is good, or bad that you should at least try to refute them. All of your endless ranting proves nothing other than you’re an inexperienced kid who has stars in his eye’s. One more out of touch idealist. The kind that elected Obama.
In short, you’re not very good at this.[/quote]
I like people like you because you are completely open and forthcoming about your views. It’s helpful when people don’t try and hide behind a facade pretending to know what they are talking about, but just expose their ignorance openly.[/quote]
Ignorant is one who cannot refute my many points above. And that would be you…junior!
I’ve already defined it. You need to focus more on what you’re reading and try to stop your mind from wondering.
Nonsense (like most everything else you post) the left hates Bill O’Reilly.
As for Jon Stewart it’s a well known fact (google it kid) that most between the ages of 18 and 28 get their news from Jon Stewart.
And…in case you don’t understand why that’s not good, he’s a comedian. And one shouldn’t get their news from a comedian.
You don’t have to feel insulted. You just have to know that what you say is diminished by what you are. Also, it’s sort of common knowledge around here that when someone gives you say 35 reasons why something is good, or bad that you should at least try to refute them. All of your endless ranting proves nothing other than you’re an inexperienced kid who has stars in his eye’s. One more out of touch idealist. The kind that elected Obama.
In short, you’re not very good at this.[/quote]
I like people like you because you are completely open and forthcoming about your views. It’s helpful when people don’t try and hide behind a facade pretending to know what they are talking about, but just expose their ignorance openly.[/quote]
Ignorant is one who cannot refute my many points above. And that would be you…junior!
I’ve already defined it. You need to focus more on what you’re reading and try to stop your mind from wondering.
Nonsense (like most everything else you post) the left hates Bill O’Reilly.
As for Jon Stewart it’s a well known fact (google it kid) that most between the ages of 18 and 28 get their news from Jon Stewart.
And…in case you don’t understand why that’s not good, he’s a comedian. And one shouldn’t get their news from a comedian.
There you are now off you go Skippy.[/quote]
[quote]Could be because Obama has destroyed all the jobs.
-100 million people on some sort of government support
-45 million people on food stamps
-Unemployment over 8% for 43 straight months (a record since the great depression)
-Adding 4 trillion to the national debt. He beat what that nasty Bush added in only four years time!
Obama is an economic train wreck kid! You don’t see it because you’re a liberal.[/quote]
Are those the ‘facts’ that you claim to have given me about Obama. And you’re attributing all of that to Obama’s policies?
[quote]Explosiv wrote:
This is the definition of a “liberal” that you gave me:
So someone who doesn’t blame Bush is not a liberal categorically?[/quote]
I see you are not as sharp as you think you are, keep scanning Skippy.[/quote]
Nah, I gave you what you typed.
You either admit that you have no grasp of the topic at hand, which you’re clearly showing, or enlighten me.[/quote]
You’ve got an “F” for the day due to your own laziness.
[/quote]
I think the reason people like you rage at John Stewart so hard is because what he says is true. And it’s funny.
But it’s funny, precisely because of the fact that the whole comedy is the fact that there are actually politicians who say the ridiculous things that he shows and then there are people that eat it up (like yourself).
I’ve noticed that I have friends like this, who absolutely rage when they watch John Stewart before they watch Steven Colbert.
I never see someone rage at Bill O’Reilly the way that self proclaimed “right winger conservatives” rage at Stewart. You say that Stewart is a comedian, but O’Reilly is too. Except O’Reilly doesn’t mean to be funny.
And the reality of the rage is very simple. Either you accept that these politicians are ridiculous and say hilarious things, which at the same time would cause you to realize that your political position is ridiculous, or you get angry for someone pointing it out so bluntly at your expense and for others humorous gain.
I think the reason people like you rage at John Stewart so hard is because what he says is true. And it’s funny.[/quote]
I see you fall in line with your demographic. 18-28 year old’s watch Jon Stewart to get their news. A C O M E D I A N.
You just raged against Bill O’Reilly by calling him a comedian. You don’t notice (enough) people rage against O’rReilly because not enough can rage against him to suit you. You are a lefty so naturally you don’t like O’Reilly.
Yeah kid either that or it could be all the lying about those on the right. While at the same time Stewart’s nose is firmly pressed against Obama’s asshole. One or the other.
[quote]Explosiv wrote:
I think a very telling quote that explains a lot about your views and your character is what you typed on the other page.
Liberals like you do not understand that weakness is provocative[/quote]
Glad that one stuck with you. Now see if you can write three paragraphs and tell me what it means to you.
I did and you missed it. Shall I once again berate you for your laziness?
Now get busy on that essay![/quote]
If you don’t wish to have a discussion, then why bother posting or responding to my posts for that matter?[/quote]
I do wish to have a discussion. Didn’t I ask you to write an essay about how you feel regarding the phrase “weakness is provocative?”
Now write the essay and we can talk about it. [/quote]
I wonder what people like you are like irl.
Do you stock up on ammo and slim jims and believes the next Armageddon is coming?
[/quote]
Ha ha come on man just because I assigned you something that you are not capable of doing?
But just to satisfy your curiosity. I hate slim jims I don’t eat much red meat, I’m a fish, chicken and turkey guy…lots of vegetables and fruit. And no I don’t think Armageddon is upon us even if Obama is reelected. A deep recession sure…but not Armageddon,
If you don’t wish to have a discussion, then why bother posting or responding to my posts for that matter?[/quote]
Hmmm… You responded to me, and then when I addressed your points in a way that would require you to speak outside your narrative, you ran away, pretending.
Stop calling other people out on your own faults. Particularly when you come off so sanctimonious.