[quote]pat wrote:
In reality your wrong. Besides you just made an argument for atheism to be a religion. If atheism isn’t a religion then how can you convert?[/quote]
Where in my post did I write convert?
If you deconvert from a religion and do not adopt a new one, then you are an atheist.
[quote]pat wrote:
I wasn’t touting her, per se I was touting her reasoning.
Like I said, YOU only look for reasons not to believe, you never investigate reasons to believe. [/quote]
Do you mind not assuming things about me? I was once upon a time a Hindu, not a deeply religious one, but I certainly was a theist.
I actually investigated what I believed, looked for evidence for god, never came up with something that justified belief.
[quote]pat wrote:
Her reasoning stands pat though, the basis for metaphysical objects such as morality doesn’t exist in atheism, therefore the attempt is to make it relativism in order to preserve a false belief. Atheism is simply a silly fiction. It reasons that everything ultimately happens for nothing. That’s plainly illogical. It will ultimately die because it is false.
Atheists refuse to follow logic to it’s necessary end because they know where it will lead them and their ego prevents them from admitting they are wrong. In the end that’s all it’s about, ego. [/quote]
We’ve discussed this at length before and not really interested in going down this again.
I do find it funny you called “atheism a silly fiction” and “plainly illogical” though.
Yet, somehow a virgin birth story and the conversion of a cracker into a 1st century Jew are completely logical right?