What does it mean to eat for performance vs just cutting/bulking?

I was re-reading TB I book (about strength) and I stumbled upon an excerpt that confused me — as I’m relatively new to training:

If you’re trying to figure out whether to cut or bulk, or mulling over how to bring up your lagging calf muscles, you’re reading the wrong book. We’ve found over the years, that things like aesthetics, fat loss, and all the rest take care of themselves if you focus on improving your performance. A body that can generate double or triple amount of force it used to is going to go through some dramatic physical changes. In other words, as long as you have your nutrition and conditioning somewhat in check, you’ll be more than satisfied with your “look“.

What does performance even mean here? Does eating for performance mean just eating at maintenance? Also, how does a person go with the fat loss phase without cutting but by solely focusing on performance?

I fell in love with the Tactical Barbell and its performance-first philosophy, but this particular excerpt confuses me.

Thanks for reading and have a blessed day!

Eat clean and workout to get stronger. IMO, never “bulk” as a goal. Your goal should be to get stronger. Then with a clean diet (and reasonably good genetics) your body composition should be tuned to gain more muscle without additional fat.

I used three metrics and feedback analysis. Strength, scale, and the mirror. The fixed nutrients are sufficient protein and fat. I adjusted carbohydrates based on those three metrics. Now get strong while keeping a beach ready physique.

5 Likes

Tagging @T3hPwnisher.

He’s the guy you want to listen to.

2 Likes

ohh yeah!!! love him!

but doesn’t getting strong at least imply that you have to be at maintenance or bulk?

Performance is individual for your goals. If I want to run a 5k in 20 minutes and bench 300, maybe I’m knocking that run out in 16 but only benching 250: I need to eat a bit more and make sure those strength workouts are going well. Conversely, if I’m benching 4 plates, but vomiting on the track, I’m too fat and I need to slim down.

The point is to free you from having to look in a mirror and decide what your nutrition goals should be: you use your athletic goals to determine how you’ll eat.

@T3hPwnisher will give a better explanation anyway.

4 Likes

Performance means strength AND conditioning in the TB world.

Eating for performance then means eating enough protein and calories to sustain strength gains, harder or longer conditioning workouts, hormone support, muscle gains WITHOUT eating too much that it is a detriment to performance. So don’t eat too much so it does not slow you down on conditioning, don’t get you too fat for pull ups which is a component of most TB programs, don’t wreck your hormones by getting too fat.

So, in the real world, if strength don’t go up, you don’t gain muscle or you are getting exhausted too fast on your conditioning workouts, eat more!

If, on the contrary, it’s harder to do pull ups and conditioning because you feel too heavy, eat less!

Forget cutting and bulking and maintaining.

2 Likes

Never thought of it that way! @T3hPwnisher wrote (I read his article a while ago) that training should drive nutrition — not vice versa. I didn’t really internalize that thought, though. Thank you!

2 Likes

I don’t like terms to describe how much to eat. I used the feedback system. The requirement for using the feedback system is that you must eat consist amounts of food. You don’t need to count calories, just know when you are eating more or less. I did it visually.

But yes to your question.

1 Like

So it’s just a simpler life :grin:

@Brant_Drake and @TrainForPain ya’ll built up the mythos of me so much I can’t possibly deliver, and TFP already gave you an outstanding answer, but here’s my short at it as well.

“Eat for performance” is exactly that. It’s telling you what outcome to eat for: performance. The difference between this and what you are describing as cutting, maintaining and bulking is that BOTH methods involve eating for an outcome: the outcome is the difference. You are describing maintaining, bulking and cutting to mean eating in a manner such that you see an outcome reflected in terms of scale weight: weight goes up (bulk), weight goes down (cut) or weight stays the same: maintain.

When THAT is your outcome, the levers you have to pull are food intake but ALSO training output.

If we accept CICO as a model, there’s two parts: the calories going in, and the calories going out. We can influence both. Well if our outcome is PURELY based around scale weight, we will influence the calories OUT portion by altering our TRAINING to achieve the desired result. If we want to lose weight, we’ll just continue to up activity to burn more calories so that the scale weight drops. If we want to increase weight, we’ll decrease activity.

And that’s what makes “bulking, cutting or maintaining” different from “eating for performance”. In the case of the former, the training is a tool used to achieve the desired outcome from the eating. In the case of the latter, the EATING is a tool used to achieve the desired outcome of the TRAINING.

When you run Tactical Barbell, you are attempting to improve in variety of areas, to include your maximal strength, your strength endurance, and your conditioning. You track this, you evaluate your progress on it, and you eat to ensure you ARE progressing on it. And, in turn, these guiding principles “keep you honest”. Because check this: if you go full Dave Tate 2005 mode on your diet and mainline Little Debbies and put on 40lbs of fluff, your max strength will go up…and your mile time will be measured with an hour glass and your chin ups will cease to exist. But if your max strength is going up, your run times are going down, and your bodyweight exercises continue to improve, it’s reasonable to assume you have gained muscle and lost fat, or, if nothing else, gained muscle and minimized fat gain to the point that your body composition is moving in a positive way.

How you can do yourself a favor here is to focus on food QUALITY rather than quantity. If you make it a goal to eat only un/minimally processed foods and drink only zero calorie beverages while attempting to get in 1g of protein per pound of bodyweight WITHOUT a protein supplement, eating when you are hungry, you will most likely radically transform your physique so long as you are improving in your training.

5 Likes

Great points! Delivered one more time… haha

1 Like

Eating for performance, while intuitive for some, is still science based for best results. It is also not a stand alone endeavor and cannot be separated from an individuals training regime and concomitant goals ie a bodybuilder has diff goals than an MMA fighter or a cyclist. So obviously no two pla s are the same.

Macros; protein, fats and carbs are crucial in correct ratios and total intake. Micros while overlooked by many are the workhorses behind the curtains, they ensure macros do their job as well as numerous other functions including recovery which tbh is the single most important factor in all serious training.

So, depending upon your goal(s) a program designed just for you is same science with a bit of obvious adjusting as you go along.

1 Like