[quote]critietaeta wrote:
Cyanide and happiness
http://www.explosm.net/comics/2106/[/quote]
Tried this.
It’s on my google reader, but I’ve stopped visiting. I dunno, just stopped seeming funny. Maybe the sick part of my brain needs to regenerate and I’ll get back into it.
Otherwise, good suggestion.
i’ll also add:
basic instructions: http://basicinstructions.net/
and, of course, dinosaur comics: Dinosaur Comics - October 5th, 2022 - awesome fun times!
[quote]iamthewolf wrote:
i’ll also add:
basic instructions: http://basicinstructions.net/
and, of course, dinosaur comics: Dinosaur Comics - October 7th, 2022 - awesome fun times! [/quote]
I stopped liking dinosaur comics after reading it consistenly for a month.
To say the art is repetitive is to say… well its not exactly a secret. And the dialogue didn’t really impress me. Maybe he’s just run out of things to say, because there are a lot of really good hits, it’s just that there seemed to me to be a lot of failures as well. Duds, even.
Ctrl+Alt+Del
It’s very geek/gamer based so probably very hit or miss based on that.
theres also some bodybuilding ones
and heres whats left of guido and luigi too bad they closed i liked those guys !
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://guidoandluigi.com
and
BB.com has a comic but called “brawns gym” just search the name on google…
Bumped because I found this one earlier today. Real funny:
http://threewordphrase.com/slipnslide.htm
Very similar to the Oatmeal: Hyperbole and a Half: Wolves
[quote]WormwoodTheory wrote:
also: www.pbfcomics.com
[/quote]
This one, for sure.
As I understand it he’s not making them anymore but there’s enough there to keep you chuckling for a while.
[quote]Otep wrote:
[quote]timbofirstblood wrote:
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal: http://www.smbc-comics.com/
I like to read XKCD, but find it to be sort of supercilious at times, like the guy writing it thinks he knows everything. It can be a little too emo for me as well. I’m definitely going to check out the other links![/quote]
Supercilious?
Did you just use the word ‘supercilious’, and then the phrase ‘the guy writing [XKCD] thinks he knows everything’?
Right. The author of XKCD is supercilious. Pot, meet kettle.[/quote]
So using the most precise word to convey one’s meaning is now analogous to being conceited? That’s the whole point of language. I guess he should have just described XKCD as being “like so random or whatever.”
[quote]bcingu wrote:
[quote]Otep wrote:
[quote]timbofirstblood wrote:
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal: http://www.smbc-comics.com/
I like to read XKCD, but find it to be sort of supercilious at times, like the guy writing it thinks he knows everything. It can be a little too emo for me as well. I’m definitely going to check out the other links![/quote]
Supercilious?
Did you just use the word ‘supercilious’, and then the phrase ‘the guy writing [XKCD] thinks he knows everything’?
Right. The author of XKCD is supercilious. Pot, meet kettle.[/quote]
So using the most precise word to convey one’s meaning is now analogous to being conceited? That’s the whole point of language. I guess he should have just described XKCD as being “like so random or whatever.” [/quote]
Yes. That is exactly what I was trying to convey. If only I weren’t limited by my inability to use the most precise words to convey my meaning. Thank you.
Stop being so pernicious, bro.
[quote]bcingu wrote:
[quote]Otep wrote:
[quote]timbofirstblood wrote:
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal: http://www.smbc-comics.com/
I like to read XKCD, but find it to be sort of supercilious at times, like the guy writing it thinks he knows everything. It can be a little too emo for me as well. I’m definitely going to check out the other links![/quote]
Supercilious?
Did you just use the word ‘supercilious’, and then the phrase ‘the guy writing [XKCD] thinks he knows everything’?
Right. The author of XKCD is supercilious. Pot, meet kettle.[/quote]
So using the most precise word to convey one’s meaning is now analogous to being conceited? That’s the whole point of language. I guess he should have just described XKCD as being “like so random or whatever.”[/quote]
Yes, his conjecture about decisive language is quite asinine.
[quote]Squiggles wrote:
[quote]bcingu wrote:
[quote]Otep wrote:
[quote]timbofirstblood wrote:
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal: http://www.smbc-comics.com/
I like to read XKCD, but find it to be sort of supercilious at times, like the guy writing it thinks he knows everything. It can be a little too emo for me as well. I’m definitely going to check out the other links![/quote]
Supercilious?
Did you just use the word ‘supercilious’, and then the phrase ‘the guy writing [XKCD] thinks he knows everything’?
Right. The author of XKCD is supercilious. Pot, meet kettle.[/quote]
So using the most precise word to convey one’s meaning is now analogous to being conceited? That’s the whole point of language. I guess he should have just described XKCD as being “like so random or whatever.”[/quote]
Yes, his conjecture about decisive language is quite asinine. [/quote]
Penis.
That is all.
[quote]pushmepullme wrote:
I loved Sexy Losers, it made me fap before fapping was cool.[/quote]
Oh Hell yeah,I loved SL. I think it jumped the shark when the artist revealed his real name as Clay because he had some kind of breakdown.