Bullshit. That’s your take on it. You want them to emphasize the race of the perp so bad to validate your own biases you reinterpret their accounts to fit your own narrative.
And as for not knowing my shit about ‘the media’, kid, you’re out of your league. I have a BA in a mass communication discipline, and over 30 successful professional years of experience in advertising and production. I’ve forgotten more about the industry than you’ll ever bother to learn.
One of the main issues is that most people cannot distinguish between journalism and commentary. And the corporations that own the outlets make damn sure those lines are blurred. Their income doesn’t come from informing or entertaining you - they sell time - and the rest is just to keep you watching or clicking on through the next sponsor.
Wow, really cool for you to brag about your work experience to strangers on internet, you sound like an insecure dipshit.
Here’s a video for you to watch. You like it when the announcer says the suv “collided” into the marching band? Nice subtle use of words huh?
Why shouldn’t they emphasize the race of the perpetrator? The media seems to do so all the time when criminals are white and the victims are either white or non white Americans. Either way, if you really have so much experience with the media you should understand the agenda mainstream media has and the false narratives they are pushing.
And dude, it’s sad that with over 30 years of experience in your industry and you still have far less critical thinking skills than a kid like me. Why don’t you tell me why rittenhouse was labeled as a terrorist while this guy driving into a crowd isnt?
Correct, as that is not how local police and the DA are characterizing it. Commentators, on the other hand, are not bound by such restraint, thus distorting YOUR expectations. Again, journalism vs. commentary, providing information or feeding your bias.
For the 3rd motherfucking time, it’s the difference between journalism and commentary. And you can’t distinguish who is doing what. And until you can you’ll keep validating your own biases by blaming the ‘mainstream media’ boogeyman. Can you even genuinely and accurately define ‘mainstream media?’ Or does bitching about it make you feel edgy and smart amongst your peers?
Yes, there are trustworthy sources in yourtube with actual news studios, a team, investigating journalists included, fact checking everything online live.
Even Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder are better at fact checking and providing news than corporate media. And they are comedians. This is what a joke the corporate media has become. People doing politics and news on youtube are way better. Matt Taibi, Tim Pool, Daily Wire, Breaking Points, Project Veritas. Fuck even Andy Ngo with an iphone made the biggest investigations on Antifa ever made and exposed them what scumbag organization they are to a degree he is seeking protection in UK. Something your multi milion news corporations were not able to pull.
As someone said above - folks like these provide commentary (along with many of the 24 hour news channels) on the news and not necessarily the news as events happened.
Trusting those two for news is like trusting your hairdresser to replace the piston rings in your car.
They are more reliable, provide news and fact check them live. Especially Crowder, check his website. He has more links to the stories they run than any news source. The dude sent a team investigating addresses to prove there is a voter fraud and got a strike.
I love how people try to discredit top 3 most watched person in the western world. The guy who had 10 times more watches during the debates from all the American media combined. You could combine the viewers of America, Europe, Australia and the whole freaking world on that live stream and he would have more public. That guys is watched for a reason. And the reason is he provides more high quality news, content and entertainment than anyone out there.
Same reason why Joe Rogan is more watched. Him trashing Lemon was fun. “How the fuck he tries to double down on his lies, when I have 10 times the viewership he has”.
So dont be stupid. These people provide value and it is higher quality than corporate media. Trying to talk them down is just stupid. Dont be stupid.
"When I say something stupid, I’m not thinking about what I’m going to say before I say it. I’m just saying it. I’m not a doctor, I’m a fucking moron, and I’m a cage-fighting commentator who’s a dirty stand-up comedian. I’m not a respected source of information, even for me.”
Lets quote him out of context trying to be humble. Great anecdotal evidence. The dude was more informed than Sanjee Gupta on vaccines, your “experts say” guy. While he thinks he is a moron himself. What experts the corporate media have.
I recommend you to go now to CNN and find if they have anything at all with this high quality of reporting on Waukesha. I bet you 100 bucks they do not. They posted just today the name of the criminal I believe, or did I find it elsewhere?
Did you know that the killer was black and racis and had a large criminal record?
look man, i’m red, through and through, but what you’re doing and claiming here isn’t showing anyone anything except your beliefs. there is evidence of him being racist, and yeah - he’s black. It does not matter.
The point you’re trying to make that “if he were white, this would be all over the news” is flawed… This IS all over the news, but his supposed racism is less stated. I agree that if the situations were reversed, the media outcry would be far louder, but we already know about CNN and MSNBC’s biases, just as we know about Fox’s biases.
The more you bring up race, the more race is brought up. If you want it to stop, YOU have to stop.
Unfortunately, no matter how legitimate, Youtube news coverage is not ready to be respected as legitimate news. Continuing to share links (which no one has clicked on) won’t change people’s opinions on that.
But you missed the point - it’s called a reductio ad absurdum argument. You claimed something absurd and I reduced it by providing an equally absurd example.
