you sound like a brain dead idiot right now. srs. the only person making any sort of sense is me. All you continue to do is hit me with your one liners which doesn’t do much damage because all your claims are baseless. You went the extra mile to look up previous posts which are completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. How about expending the extra energy to actually have a valid argument? I highly doubt you’re a marine. What was your UG degree in? I bet it had something to do with sociology lol.
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
3. They would be great trading partners. (just like Germany and Japan are now)
[/quote]
You realize we overthrew the government’s of both your examples right?
[/quote]
You do realize that those were Fascist regimes? You know Tojo, Hitler, and lets even throw in Mussolini. The government that we overthrew in Iran was a democratically elected one. we essentially appointed their Hitler. Only we sanctioned them to a point where they’d be no threat to us the way Hitler turned out to be. Open up a book dude this is history 101 class. [/quote]
Lol…
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
There’s no doubt in my mind that if we had not overthrown their government in the 50’s things would be a lot different.
- They would be great trading partners. (just like Germany and Japan are now)
[/quote]
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
You realize we overthrew the government’s of both your examples right?
[/quote]
We overthrew the government of both Germany and Japan and they became great trading partners, but we shouldn’t have overthrown Iran’s government so that they could become great trading partners???
That’s some logic…
What type of government or regime isn’t all that relevant. We are trading partners with China, what kind of government do they have? [/quote]
What do you mean it doesn’t matter? It’s a matter of apples and oranges. [/quote]
Did you or did you not compare Iran’s democracy (the one they had for about 3 minutes) to Germany and Japan? Now you want to lecture me about apples to oranges compassion? Get real. The point that went sailing over your head is that the type of governement is pretty much irrelevant when discussing trade relations. That is why we can be trade partners with the likes of China, Russia, etc…
[quote]
China isn’t a fascist dictatorship, they’re COMMUNIST!! There’s a huge difference from the two. Go back to school bud. GI bill could come in handy. [/quote]
Lol, typical bullshit response from some assclown that just finished up World History 101. Give me a break.
I already used my GI Bill to earn an undergraduate degree bud. You sound just as retarded in this thread as your sports are fixed thread.
I ask you to back up your statement and the response is, “read a book.” Go fuck yourself kid. [/quote]
now go ask for a refund. I backed up my claim plenty. [/quote]
You didn’t back your claim up at all…
[quote]
Don’t believe me? scroll up. You seemed to have forgotten to quote that large paragraph that I so eloquently typed for you above. [/quote]
I didn’t quote that paragraph because it’s irrelevant. Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism. I don’t expect Tumblr has taught you that yet. Maybe one day.
Therefore, the fact that we overthrew Iran’s government has absolutely zero baring on our trade relationship with them. There is no correlation and we have example, which you provided, that show we can quite literally destroy an enemy and then create an outstanding trade relationships with them.
We fucked Japan up 1,000x worse than we did Iran and they’re like our BFF now.
[quote]
No shit sherlock! that’s like saying working out will make you fat only because when I didn’t workout I was still fat. [/quote]
You are a dolt.
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
you sound like a brain dead idiot right now. srs. the only person making any sort of sense is me. [/quote]
Thanks for the laugh this afternoon kiddo, I needed it.
[quote]
All you continue to do is hit me with your one liners which doesn’t do much damage because all your claims are baseless. You went the extra mile to look up previous posts which are completely irrelevant to the topic at hand. How about expending the extra energy to actually have a valid argument? I highly doubt you’re a marine. What was your UG degree in? I bet it had something to do with sociology lol. [/quote]
Wrong on both accounts, which of course is quite shocking…
hahahahahahahaha a state that sponsors terrorism? It’s not like we the USA bombed innocent civilians in Iraq? Did we do that for strategic gain or because we sponsor terrorism? Just be quite and have a seat
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
They’ve threatened Israel? Maybe they did that because Israel assassinated all of the Nuclear Physicists?[/quote]
And maybe they eliminated the Nuclear Physicists because they were threatened by nuclear attack?
Not counting the state sponsored terrorism that they export…you forgot to mention that.
[quote]Yep lets invade a country because someone threatened the big bully in the east and chanted ‘death to america’ out their 1974 stationwagon window. lol
[/quote]
Keep in mind that’s all they have. If they had more they would use it against the US and certainly against Israel.
Don’t be naive.
Brah,
You’re coming off as a dimwit. Enough.
Also, Hitler was elected. You know that, right?
Your half-literate posts and juvenile mouthing aren’t getting you anywhere, chief. Try something different.
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Brah,
You’re coming off as a dimwit. Enough.
Also, Hitler was elected. You know that, right?
Your half-literate posts and juvenile mouthing aren’t getting you anywhere, chief. Try something different.[/quote]
what does him being elected have anything to do with the topic? Hell he was even arrested at one point. What’s your point?
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
hahahahahahahaha a state that sponsors terrorism? It’s not like we the USA bombed innocent civilians in Iraq? Did we do that for strategic gain or because we sponsor terrorism? Just be quite and have a seat [/quote]
I’m surprised you haven’t joined ISIS yet. You seem like their type of recruit.
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
Just be quite[/quote]
I’m curious, be quite what, exactly?
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Brah,
You’re coming off as a dimwit. Enough.
Also, Hitler was elected. You know that, right?
Your half-literate posts and juvenile mouthing aren’t getting you anywhere, chief. Try something different.[/quote]
what does him being elected have anything to do with the topic? Hell he was even arrested at one point. What’s your point?[/quote]
O_O you can’t be fucking serious…
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
hahahahahahahaha a state that sponsors terrorism? It’s not like we the USA bombed innocent civilians in Iraq? Did we do that for strategic gain or because we sponsor terrorism? Just be quite and have a seat [/quote]
I’m surprised you haven’t join ISIS yet. You seem like their type of recruit. [/quote]
Yes of course. The guy that preaches peace and diplomacy and doesn’t have a thirst for blood seems like their perfect recruit. I want no war. I don’t want children to be bombed, fathers taken away from their families, inflation, debt, enslavement etc.
[quote]jjackkrash wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
Just be quite[/quote]
I’m curious, be quite what, exactly? [/quote]
clearly a typo.
*be quiet
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
hahahahahahahaha a state that sponsors terrorism? It’s not like we the USA bombed innocent civilians in Iraq? Did we do that for strategic gain or because we sponsor terrorism? Just be quite and have a seat [/quote]
I’m surprised you haven’t join ISIS yet. You seem like their type of recruit. [/quote]
Yes of course. The guy that preaches peace and diplomacy and doesn’t have a thirst for blood seems like their perfect recruit. I want no war. I don’t want children to be bombed, fathers taken away from their families, inflation, debt, enslavement etc. [/quote]
No one wants children to be bombed, fathers to be taken away from their families, enslavement, etc… We don’t always get what we want.
Blood thirsty, you really have no clue kid.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
hahahahahahahaha a state that sponsors terrorism? It’s not like we the USA bombed innocent civilians in Iraq? Did we do that for strategic gain or because we sponsor terrorism? Just be quite and have a seat [/quote]
I’m surprised you haven’t join ISIS yet. You seem like their type of recruit. [/quote]
Yes of course. The guy that preaches peace and diplomacy and doesn’t have a thirst for blood seems like their perfect recruit. I want no war. I don’t want children to be bombed, fathers taken away from their families, inflation, debt, enslavement etc. [/quote]
No one wants children to be bombed, fathers to be taken away from their families, enslavement, etc… We don’t always get what we want.
Blood thirsty, you really have no clue kid. [/quote]
Then enlighten the youth. I’m all ears. you keep spewing all this rhetoric without any substance. Just give me an idea of how ‘dangerous’ they really are.
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
hahahahahahahaha a state that sponsors terrorism? It’s not like we the USA bombed innocent civilians in Iraq? Did we do that for strategic gain or because we sponsor terrorism? Just be quite and have a seat [/quote]
I’m surprised you haven’t join ISIS yet. You seem like their type of recruit. [/quote]
Yes of course. The guy that preaches peace and diplomacy and doesn’t have a thirst for blood seems like their perfect recruit. I want no war. I don’t want children to be bombed, fathers taken away from their families, inflation, debt, enslavement etc. [/quote]
No one wants children to be bombed, fathers to be taken away from their families, enslavement, etc… We don’t always get what we want.
Blood thirsty, you really have no clue kid. [/quote]
Then enlighten the youth. I’m all ears. you keep spewing all this rhetoric without any substance. Just give me an idea of how ‘dangerous’ they really are. [/quote]
Smh… I haven’t spewed any rhetoric unless you count Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism, which they clearly are.
I don’t believe Iran is a threat to the continental United States at this very moment. They are a threat to our allies in the region and they are a threat to regional stability, which could very quickly become a problem for us.
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
In short, you’re a fucking idiot.
[/quote]
I realized this before making any kind of meaningful response. Not worth it.
[quote]Aggv wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
In short, you’re a fucking idiot.
[/quote]
I realized this before making any kind of meaningful response. Not worth it. [/quote]
I can’t help myself for some reason…
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
hahahahahahahaha a state that sponsors terrorism? It’s not like we the USA bombed innocent civilians in Iraq? Did we do that for strategic gain or because we sponsor terrorism? Just be quite and have a seat [/quote]
I’m surprised you haven’t join ISIS yet. You seem like their type of recruit. [/quote]
Yes of course. The guy that preaches peace and diplomacy and doesn’t have a thirst for blood seems like their perfect recruit. I want no war. I don’t want children to be bombed, fathers taken away from their families, inflation, debt, enslavement etc. [/quote]
No one wants children to be bombed, fathers to be taken away from their families, enslavement, etc… We don’t always get what we want.
Blood thirsty, you really have no clue kid. [/quote]
Then enlighten the youth. I’m all ears. you keep spewing all this rhetoric without any substance. Just give me an idea of how ‘dangerous’ they really are. [/quote]
Smh… I haven’t spewed any rhetoric unless you count Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism, which they clearly are.
I don’t believe Iran is a threat to the continental United States at this very moment. They are a threat to our allies in the region and they are a threat to regional stability, which could very quickly become a problem for us. [/quote]
Regional stability? Iraq is very stable oh wait… Allies? that’s plural so you must mean more than one. One ally I can think of is Israel. The only other one I can think of are the Saudis to which both you and I don’t benefit in the slightest. Who do you think is funding the Syrian uprising? Libyan? Egypt? Come on you know the answer to that. We’re preaching stability when in actuality we’ve destabilized it all by ourselves.
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Brah,
You’re coming off as a dimwit. Enough.
Also, Hitler was elected. You know that, right?
Your half-literate posts and juvenile mouthing aren’t getting you anywhere, chief. Try something different.[/quote]
what does him being elected have anything to do with the topic? Hell he was even arrested at one point. What’s your point?[/quote]
Good Lord.
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
[quote]usmccds423 wrote:
[quote]Justliftbrah wrote:
hahahahahahahaha a state that sponsors terrorism? It’s not like we the USA bombed innocent civilians in Iraq? Did we do that for strategic gain or because we sponsor terrorism? Just be quite and have a seat [/quote]
I’m surprised you haven’t join ISIS yet. You seem like their type of recruit. [/quote]
Yes of course. The guy that preaches peace and diplomacy and doesn’t have a thirst for blood seems like their perfect recruit. I want no war. I don’t want children to be bombed, fathers taken away from their families, inflation, debt, enslavement etc. [/quote]
No one wants children to be bombed, fathers to be taken away from their families, enslavement, etc… We don’t always get what we want.
Blood thirsty, you really have no clue kid. [/quote]
Then enlighten the youth. I’m all ears. you keep spewing all this rhetoric without any substance. Just give me an idea of how ‘dangerous’ they really are. [/quote]
Smh… I haven’t spewed any rhetoric unless you count Iran is a state sponsor of terrorism, which they clearly are.
I don’t believe Iran is a threat to the continental United States at this very moment. They are a threat to our allies in the region and they are a threat to regional stability, which could very quickly become a problem for us. [/quote]
Regional stability? Iraq is very stable oh wait… Allies? that’s plural so you must mean more than one. One ally I can think of is Israel. The only other one I can think of are the Saudis to which both you and I don’t benefit in the slightest. Who do you think is funding the Syrian uprising? Libyan? Egypt? Come on you know the answer to that. We’re preaching stability when in actuality we’ve destabilized it all by ourselves. [/quote]
I don’t think it’s prudent to let the region destabilize any further and we didn’t destabilize it “all by ourselves”.