[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]Brother Chris wrote:
[quote]SexMachine wrote:
[quote]Lover95 wrote:
Is the eucharist the literal flesh of chirst, or is it just a metaphor?[/quote]
WTF?
Absolutely, it’s literal. On the third day Mary tore strips of flesh off Christ. That’s what the priests put in our mouths at communion. The reason there is such a decline in Church attendance is that we are running out of genuine Christ meat.[/quote]
No, this is not true.
If it was we would be cannibals, even though we have been accused of being cannibals and I have a drinking team named the Catholic Cannibals, it is not actually true that Catholics are cannibals. Under the appearance of bread and wine it is the ENTIRE body, blood, soul and divinity of Jesus. We are not eating pieces of Jesus, we are consuming the entire body and blood of Jesus.[/quote]
Sarcasm detector not working today?[/quote]
Guess you didn’t get my sarcasm in the Catholic Cannibals comment.[/quote]
I think it’s a good name. You are correct that we have been accused of cannibalism. See Geraldis Cambransis’s ‘Topography of Ireland’. We used to eat babies and turn sticks into snakes with black magic apparently.[/quote]
The Romans used to think we’d drink our enemies blood during our masses. So, Catholics have no shortages of rumors from the beginning. Although I think the locked door policy after the homily would be a good tool. Make the pagans think we’re back to our old tricks of eating our enemies.
