[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
[quote]Derek542 wrote:
I clearly addressed your topic with examples asking for clarification, I do not see where that is reading failure.
YOU have yet to address those questions in reference to your original generalizations which would clarify YOUR mistake.
Your generalization in the original mistake was clarified to some point in later posts, which do not require you to repost. However your whole premise is of course MEN are only manly if they do not engage in any activity that is below your standard, which you have listed examples of. [/quote]
But I didn’t make a mistake. I listed some examples. I can list more from a wide range - let’s see, change a tire, taking care of women and children, be able to talk intelligently on important topics, all kinds of stuff.
Mastering Gears of War ain’t one of them.
In any event, my point was (and remains) that the over-indulgence in video games - the kinds that results in 30-somethings acting like adoloscents - is “unmanly”. And it is. Refusing to grow up is pretty much the definition of being “unmanly”, because people who are supposed to be “men” remain “boys”.[/quote]
Okay now I would agree with this of course, this makes clear sense.
I had a friend I worked ER with, her husband spent every fucking weekend hunting, pretty much all year long. Now he worked put food on the table, was there during the week for his wife and kids (to an extent). However every weekend he was gone, he was doing “manly” stuff and he could point to the fact he took care of his family.
You know what, she ended up having an affair, who is at fault in this?
The point most of us are just trying to make is ANYTHING activity wise could be an addiction that could devalue a man. It is not the activity to blame but the individual themselves.
To blame gaming is an easy unintelligent argument to me.
Blame our society for establishing a culture where people are lacking the mental fortitude and strength to control our self indulgence being food or leisure.