So, strongman is done for the year for me. Did my last competition I can do in the Novice class and I’ll have to move to Open. That means I need to get a lot stronger to have a chance at hanging with the pack. All good things as it’s both a break and something to work towards. I’ll do a recap of the event later this week, as I’m hoping the scoresheets will become available.
This brings up what I’ll be doing training wise, and conveniently, the ADD challenge. I’ve got two ideas I’m bouncing between for a program template, I’ll list them both out and then tag a few folks to get help choosing one or the other.
Option A:
Day 1
Giant set of explosive movement - front squat (Hepburn progression) - core work
Giant set of explosive movement - back squat (pr sets or weekly volume bump) - core work
Assistance
Day 2
Giant set of pullups - strict press (pr sets and SSL pr sets) - core work
Giant set of upper back work - press variation (change after 3 or 6 weeks) - lateral raises
Assistance
Day 3
ROM mat pulls
Box squat misery
Day 4
Giant set of rows - bench (Kroc program) - core work
Giant set of rows - incline (3x10 double progression) - core work
Assistance
Option B
Day 1
Giant set of explosive movement - squat variation - core work
Giant set of explosive movement - deadlifts - core work
Assistance
Day 2
Giant set of pullups - press variation - core work
Giant set of rows - bench - core work
Assistance
Day 3
Giant set of explosive movement - deadlift variation - core work
Giant set of explosive movement - squats - core work
Assistance
Day 4
Giant set of rows - bench variation - core work
Giant set of pullups - strict press - core work
Assistance
So they’re far more similar than different from a structure standpoint, big difference would be training approach. Option A would be pretty regimented in terms of programming, each lift has a specific program and progression it would follow (in the parenthesis above). Option B on the other hand is something I thought of in the shower a couple days ago. Basically would rotate between a handful of variations of a main lift working up to a 5RM (maybe a 3RM here and there) then drop back to 80% for an AMRAP. Then I’d do the opposite “comp” lift for some volume work, thinking 4x6-8 double progression.
Here’s where I’m at; option A will 100% give me results. It’s basically what I was doing prior to my competition prep and I believe it’s a solid approach. The nature of the program lends itself to my home gym, so adapting to travel can be a pain. It’d be a pretty lifting focused program and very planned feeling.
Option B is fairly unknown to me, but I’m sure it’d be effective given the right effort. It’s much more flexible from a travel perspective, and by introducing planned ADD it could be a nice mental bonus. This would let me put a little more focus on stuff outside lifting and be more creative/free wheeling.
Definitely benefits to either approach, figure I’ve got a week to make a call since I’m recovering from Saturdays comp by traveling early this week.
@Frank_C @littlesleeper @flappinit @mortdk @cdmac24 @liftangryordie500
No offense to anyone not tagged, but I know these dudes like to talk hypothetical shop more than some of the other folks who may stop by here.