I’m honestly still thinking about what he meant. This is the kind of weird shit that for some reason I just need to figure out lol.
I mean I don’t buy anything he says. I want to know and understand the thought process which led to such an absurd conclusion. It’s probably because it’s linked to my profession. Just can’t help it.
-Trump lost voters earning under $50K by 15 points.
-Trump lost voters earning btw $50-$100K by 13.
-Trump voters earning over $100K by 11.
Trump not quite the working class hero he’s touted as. I think Biden had a lot to do with that - he connects with the working class far better than his primary contenders - but Trump didn’t appear to run the table with his so-called “base.”
I keep hearing about a mild swing in Black, Asian and Latino votes towards Trump. Why was this the case? Is is because of the Far Left, e.g, LGBTQ, BLM, Antifa extremists etc.
I start the new Fox to carry the standard, since Fox has laid the groundwork for 2 years to bail.
Old man Murdock rode it, whether he agreed or not, but sons are pampered ideologues and willing to bail to satisfy their wives.
PS how to exonerate when there is no conviction?
PSS or twitter,why reinvent the wheel?
Would he? I assumed the term “latino” was used for latin Americans, but not for Southern Europeans.
I also think that a good portion of Americans don’t realise that Latin Americans aren’t necessarily “brown”. Plenty of white, black, asian (to use the American “terms”) Latin Americans.
One thing I would say about exit polls is they have been known to be incredibly inaccurate (insert joke about other election polls here). You can find data where studies after the exit polls happen that show significantly different results.
Like other polls I wouldn’t say that means they have no value merely that making broad assumptions about them should typically come with a bit of caution.
It’s the nerdy type of stuff I like as I enjoy polling and what it might and might not tell us. This article goes into a bit of why some of those initial thoughts from 2016 probably ended up being wrong.
But for right now it’s the only look we have into what happened so other data simply doesn’t exist.
Was democracy tyranny when you predicted the Silent Majority would deliver Trump a landslide victory? Bet you would be a big fan of democracy had that happened?