Stable genius.
Trump Takes Credit for ‘Most Secure Election Ever’ But Still Claims Democrats ‘Rigged’ It
Stable genius.
Trump Takes Credit for ‘Most Secure Election Ever’ But Still Claims Democrats ‘Rigged’ It
Oh I’d never say that this isn’t a risk or possible. But if you’re going to claim massive voter fraud you need evidence. Because voter fraud has consistently been looked for throughout modern history and we’re talking very few cases. Was reading that the Heritage foundation said 1200 known cases since 1980. Unfortunate yes. Evidence that our election process can’t be trusted? No way.
Right now we have a Presidential candidate and a lot (not all) of his supporters essentially saying you can’t trust anything that happened Tuesday. Calling into question every congressional race, proposition, anything that was on the ballot in any state. To me the likelihood is far higher that this is the results of a whiny baby President who told everyone if he lost it was because the fix is in than widespread voter fraud.
I must admit to spitting out my soup when l saw article saying Dominion shut down by Steve Doocy, he of cookbook authoring fame.
Damn. Another fraudulent State.
Biden has won Georgia.
I thought for sure that was an Onion article. No way somebody could be that clueless.
Not really. Trump’s lawyer have not been able to produce one shred of evidence of fraud. In fact, they have not even claimed fraud in the court, because doing so without any evidence would be highly problematic.
There is evidence. There is a lack of reasonable evidence that could be used to draw a conclusion of voter fraud.
I looked back and you introduced ‘fraud’ and now try to pin the specificity of that on my claim. I said it appears suspicious and worthy of digging into. I don’t change my thought that neither of know. Nor do l make posts like mufasa saying GA just called when they are about to go thru a 5 week recount by hand. Because neither he nor CNN know.
I am sure there are legalities (which l have zero experience in processing), that make fraud difficult to prove, while proving an inaccurate count due to whatever reason -somewhat easier.
My bad. I have been talking about any evidence of fraud.
Because it’s not like they have the president of the USA behind them. The person who Hillary couldn’t beat even though she runs the world.
I don’t think that even makes Trump’s top 100 clueless comments/speeches.
I’m not sure what to take from this article? It seems as if Trump has had lawyers that have represented him they have just been losing? Which isn’t the lawyers fault.
Is the lawyer who said we don’t have evidence of voter fraud throwing him under the bus? Or simply being ethical? Is it really “bully” lawyers on the left hurting him? Or is it accusations and insistence on fantasy?
Can you throw someone under the bus if they ask you to do the impossible and you fail?
Although I do like the below and would love to see us make changes to the money structure around these things. I’ve always hated citizens United.
“If we continue to run [elections and campaigns] like we have now, which is sort of a clique of grifters taking a bunch of money as middlemen from in between donors and giving it to candidates and ground and and party infrastructure, we will lose,”
before election…
Trump voters: we love Trump because he makes liberals cry and isn’t afraid to piss people off.
After election…
Trump voters: we can’t believe this wonderful man who made so many angry lost the election.
Pretty much this. That’s another head scratcher for the “must be rigged” folks. Biden was significantly more well liked than Hilary. She lost Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania by something like 75,000 combined votes. And we’re just absolutely shocked a much more popular politician who happened to be on the same ticket as a guy who carried those states twice won them?
“This doesn’t make sense Trump had the signs in lawns and the rallies!!!”
In fairness to you and him both these aren’t at odds with each other. The media can and has for a long time “called” races when it appears a person has won. Right wrong or indifferent this isn’t anything new.
Biden is up according to Fox News by over 14,000. This this was any other election and they had that count on election night they would have called it. The other media outlets like they did with Arizona have held off probably over expected scrutiny more than them not being confident in their predictions.
Note: I guess I’m expecting that he posted that because someone had called it? I’m assuming CNN?
Well what I got from the article was the lawyers had no problem taking the money, but when it came to having a fight on their hands they bailed due to alleged pressure from the “other side” . I attempted to go to a link regarding this but it didn’t work, so I’m not sure what the pressure from the other side was.
I think it has more to do with not wanting to be the ones to prove Trump was right, than it does there being no evidence.
What makes you think he lost the electron?