US Presidential Election Predictions

Lol exactly, who gives a shit what Pompeo’s job is?

Next thing you know you’ll have people bitching about what’s supposed to be the job of the POTUS. Or telling me it’s not my job to be messing around in T-nation during my work hours. Same shit.

Who’s to say Pompeo can’t do a stand up comedy bit when the cameras are rolling, if he wants to? Trump certaninly has done a few.

1 Like

The cultists can’t be bothered to care about such things - too busy looking for funnies and troll jobs, you know, like the Constitution says - but we’re losing time to get Biden briefed on NatSec intelligence.

1 Like

I do, I would use the word abetted. My specific example is when the Trump campaign went “professional” in 2016 and hired Paul Manafort. A quick google pulled up all sorts of juicy stuff for any respectable journalist to grill him on (stuff which in hindsight obviously got him jail time). As a Trump “hater” in 2016, I was absolutely aghast as all the “news” shows lobbed Manafort one softball question after another; it was mind-boggling.

So, yes, call me petty…because in my “scale of justice”, you reap what you sow.

And as I’ve mentioned time and again, if you don’t read/listen to Trump, he was too busy starring in his own reality show to actually implement “bad” policy, imo. Meanwhile, Obama was awesome to read/listen to, but based on my own personal situation, Obama was much worse for me than Trump, LOLLLL.

Biden was an adequate candidate, but I 100% believe in his (ongoing) cognitive decline. If you remember Reagan towards the end of his 2nd term, that is my best case scenario for Biden.

1 Like

Yea, I’m sure that’s what happened. (Insert eye roll here)

Yes. As long as his policies are enacted and are in line with my beliefs. And they are.

Are left wingers ok with their democratic leaders pushing violence? That seems a bit worse than Trump sitting on the toilet tweeting at 4am.

Hearken back to 2016. Trump never exceeded (or even reached iirc) the 30% level of support until he effectively won the GOP nomination. IMO that 30% of 70+ million is the upper bound of angry supporters who support this popular MSM (are you, the student of history, allowing yourself to succumb to propaganda?) narrative of being “robbed”.

As I repeatedly mention, Biden won the popular vote by 5 million votes and counting. That is why I believe no one outside that 30% (assuming they’re all the rabid rabble that is popularly assumed) will feel “robbed”.

1 Like

Wow, project much?

Sure. If you ignore the fact that no one has called for more violence than the President himself throughout the last five years he’s been in the spotlight.*

*. To get to that you’re going to need to add a bunch of people to claim they are “leaders” and add them together. And you’ll also have to do the usual dismiss the things he’s said as not calling for violence and add anything remotely like unrest as calls for violence.

Which is a debate that’s been had on here already though I’m not sure if you were in it or not. Fuck anyone whose higher up that calls for violence left or right. But you’re significantly burying your head in the sand if you think Trump hasn’t stoked these flames on his side since he started running. Doesn’t mean I don’t think he has plenty of company.

1 Like

You could always get Twitter read through them all and they wouldn’t bother you either. Something tells me you not having Twitter doesn’t have a thing to do why they don’t bother you. Also I’m going to guess you’ve seen/read most of them.

Nope. They sold their collective soul (except for a small rump of principled dissidents) and decided entertainment was more important than substance.

Two truths: Trump lost and pat is once again showing us all that he’s a moron.

It depends on how you define significant chunk.

Government healthcare for all?

I have zero problems with all Americans having access to healthcare, as long as it’s not mandated that I use said government healthcare. I still want access to free market options, but am fine with there being a government option for those that want it.

2 Likes

I won’t dismiss an actual call for violence, but you’ll have to prove it. Give me an example where he did this. I won’t bother linking all the democrats who have called for actual violence because you’ll either gloss over it or deny it, but I know that you know the proof is out there.
And more importantly, actual violence being done as a result of those democrats. What violence has been done in the name of Trump or the Republicans?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/21506029/trump-violence-tweets-racist-hate-speech

Others are out there if you prefer a different format. And yes I know vox is left however this is the one that seemed the easiest format to read and the things it is using are actual quotes.

Lol you won’t bother showing proof because I won’t care but need proof from me? I’d be curious to know exactly what you’re pointing to when you come to the conclusion but if you don’t want to do so I’m not going to force you. If the proof is out there I would assume it would be easy for you to show.

This is the same thing Hannity used to say about Obama.

I’m not sure which post or quote of mine you’re referring to?

The Vox article. Trump encouraging violence. Hannity (and many on the right) used to say Obama was encouraging violence from the left. Ferguson, kimani gray, Baltimore, etc.