Unemployment to Stay High for 2 Yrs

WASHINGTON - With the economy healing, Federal Reserve officials debated last month when to reel in the extraordinary stimulus aid they injected into the economy. Some officials wanted to start selling assets on its books “in the near future,” documents released Wednesday show.

Selling assets would sop up some of the stimulus money and shrink the Fed’s $2.2 trillion balance sheet. But many members expressed concern that such transactions could drive up interest rates and hurt the economic recovery.

Last week, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said he didn’t expect any asset sales soon. The documents on the Fed’s closed-door meeting last month pointed to divergent thoughts about the timing and tools to reverse course and start tightening credit.

The Fed also released a forecast Wednesday predicting unemployment will stay high over the next two years because recession-scarred Americans are likely to stay cautious.

At the Jan. 26-27 meeting, the Fed left rates at a record low near zero to help nurture the recovery and drive down unemployment. And it pledged to hold rates at “exceptionally low” levels for an “extended period.”

One Fed official, Thomas Hoenig, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, objected to maintaining that pledge. He feared it would increase inflationary pressures, the documents show. Instead, Hoenig wanted to change the language to say rates would stay low for “some time.”

Hoenig said he thought such a change would give the Fed more flexibility to start raising rates, the documents said. Hoenig also thought a move toward “modestly higher” interest rates should happen soon.

Bernanke, in remarks last week, suggested the Fed is still months away from raising rates and draining money out of the financial system. The recovery is still fragile and unemployment, now at 9.7 percent, is high.

In its economic forecast, Fed policymakers said it will take “some time” for the economy and the jobs market to get back to normal. They did not spell out how long that would be. Previously, they suggested it could take five or six years for economic conditions to return to full health.

A “sizable minority,” though, said they thought it could take more than five or six years for the economy and the job market to return to normal.

The Fed said the unemployment rate this year could hover between 9.5 percent and 9.7 percent and between 8.2 percent and 8.5 percent next year. By 2012, the rate will range between 6.6 percent and 7.5 percent, it predicted.

Those forecasts are little changed from projections the Fed released in late November. But they suggest unemployment will remain elevated heading into this year’s congressional elections and the presidential election in 2012. A more normal unemployment rate would be between 5.5 percent and 6 percent.

Fed policymakers “expect that the pace of the economic recovery will be restrained by household and business uncertainty, only gradual improvement in labor market conditions and a slow easing of credit conditions in the banking sector,” according to the forecast.

Against that backdrop, the Fed expects the economy will grow between 2.8 percent and 3.5 percent this year. Growth will pick up to between 3.4 percent and 4.5 percent next year and log similar growth in 2012. The economy would need to grow by at least 5 percent a year to make a dent in the unemployment rate, analysts say.

As Fed policymakers debated ways to bring policy closer to normal, most thought that a future program of “gradual” asset sales could be helpful in shrinking the Fed’s balance sheet.Among those the Fed’s assets are mortgage securities it has bought from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The Fed is scheduled to end $1.25 trillion worth of such purchases at the end of March. The purchases are aimed at lowering mortgage rates and bolstering the housing market. The Fed has held the door open to extending the program if the economy weakened. Some analysts fear that once the program ends, mortgage rates could rise, hurting the recovery in housing and the overall economy.

Last week, Bernanke said the central bank will likely start to tighten credit by boosting the rate it pays banks on money they leave at the central bank. Doing so would raise rates tied to commercial banks’ prime rate and affect many consumer loans.

Fed officials said that bumping up the interest on bank reserves would be a key element of their exit strategy, according to Wednesday’s documents. Officials offered a range of strategies on how this and other tools could be used.

Damn mods, thread should have Feds:

I thought this thread was going to be about someone using unemployment dollars to fund their weed habit. Which sounds exactly like my brother-in-law.

[quote]HG Thrower wrote:
I thought this thread was going to be about someone using unemployment dollars to fund their weed habit. Which sounds exactly like my brother-in-law.[/quote]

That is exactly what the Democrats wants your brother-in-law to do. That makes him even more dependent on the government for help.

Eh I see it firsthand. I graduated in april and just now got a job with a dual BS in Econ/geology and good grades. I also applied to at least several jobs a day, and looked 2hrs or so a day in addition to calling staffing agencies 1-2x a week. I have another friend graduated the year before me and has had only temp work. This is not even liberal studies majors but business and finance grads I know. My perspective is that of a new grad, cant comment on older workforce people.

Also without even discussing the stimulus, the government job creation plan is terrible. Or rather the incentive structure they created. This is kinda why the markets rallied, as firms value increased from laying off people and making others toil harder. Infrastructure investment and a timely increase in rates would help this. However, this economy relies on consumer spending too much for that to ever occur. Isnt it odd that this country demonizes saving?

[quote]dmaddox wrote:

[quote]HG Thrower wrote:
I thought this thread was going to be about someone using unemployment dollars to fund their weed habit. Which sounds exactly like my brother-in-law.[/quote]

That is exactly what the Democrats wants your brother-in-law to do. That makes him even more dependent on the government for help.[/quote]
You’ll get no argument from me.

[quote]666Rich wrote:
Eh I see it firsthand. I graduated in april and just now got a job with a dual BS in Econ/geology and good grades. I also applied to at least several jobs a day, and looked 2hrs or so a day in addition to calling staffing agencies 1-2x a week. I have another friend graduated the year before me and has had only temp work. This is not even liberal studies majors but business and finance grads I know. My perspective is that of a new grad, cant comment on older workforce people.

Also without even discussing the stimulus, the government job creation plan is terrible. Or rather the incentive structure they created. This is kinda why the markets rallied, as firms value increased from laying off people and making others toil harder. Infrastructure investment and a timely increase in rates would help this. However, this economy relies on consumer spending too much for that to ever occur. Isnt it odd that this country demonizes saving? [/quote]

Econ/Geol? Never thought about that combination. Yeah, I’m kind of glad I have a few more years of school before I go into the job market. Hell, if it’s still not looking good then I might go to grad.

"If You Thought the Housing Meltdown Was Bad…
By Doug Hornig

…wait until you see what’s in the cards for commercial real estate.

That’s right, the next train wreck will be in commercial real estate. Couldn’t be worse than last year’s residential market crash? That remains to be seen. But it’s coming soon, probably as early as the second quarter of next year, and there’s nothing that can prevent it. The government will intervene, trying desperately to delay the day of reckoning, and may even succeed. For a while. But make no mistake about it, that train is going off the tracks no matter what."

http://www.dollardaze.org/blog/?post_id=00737

The rest of the article is an excellent read. Here’s a sample:

"According to a recent Deutsche Bank presentation, the delinquency rate on commercial loans as of the end of 2Q09 was greater than 4%. Of these, they expect that north of 70% will not qualify for refinancing. Imagine what will happen to the estimated $2 trillion in commercial mortgages that mature between now and 2013.

And even that is not the end of it. There’s a second huge wave on the way in 2015-16."