Uncles Whoops Nephews Ass Over E-Thugging

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Big Banana wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If this many people condone whippings, why all of the ranting when that woman on Dr Phil gave her adopted son hot sauce?

Hot sauce (MILD) is way worse than an ass whipping with a belt or branch?[/quote]

I never heard of this one. Did she put in in his eye or something?[/quote]

Nope. She gave it to him for him to put in his mouth as punishment for lying at school…and many here who are also posting in this thread stated that this was CHILD ABUSE but are now talking about how they got whippings.

I knew they were being hypocrites then but this sends it home.[/quote]

Well, let’ tell the whole story.

First, she bullied him by brow beating him like a nazi interrogator. She wasn’t “parenting” she was “bullying”. Then, it was off to the “hot sauce” routine. Then it was followed by the forced cold shower where there may or may not have been some spanking. And the kid was about 7 or 8.

To merely describe it as “hot sauce” punishment takes away all the context of the video. Everyone in that studio audience was shocked and appalled. If you showed them this same video, I’m pretty sure there would be be no majority visceral objection to the video, even among those that do not believe in corporal punishment. You’re ignoring context and texture of the two incidents.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Amiright wrote:

[quote]SILVERDAN7 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If this many people condone whippings, why all of the ranting when that woman on Dr Phil gave her adopted son hot sauce?

Hot sauce (MILD) is way worse than an ass whipping with a belt or branch?[/quote]

First thought is one was a 6 or 7 year old kid the other was a teenager looked at least 14. While I am not a huge fan o psych. as a science, I do think one of the things it has right is development. The kid in the hot sauce video was still at an age where he has some undeveloped characteristics, like apathy. The fourteen year old DOES know better, the five year old might, but not necessarily.
[/quote]

x2 The age makes a huge difference… I’ve gotten an ear full about this type of thing from my friend who does human development research and what not. Some of its actually pretty interesting but most imo is pretty garbage. [/quote]

But my point is, how does one justify whipping a kid that age (because I am going to assume that the people in this thread claiming they got whippings didn’t have them withheld until they were 15 fucking years old) while acting like hot sauce is a danger? At the age of 7 I got “whippings”. Am I somehow the ONLY one in this thread? If not, then how is hot sauce (MILD) somehow child abuse but a whipping isn’t?[/quote]

They will say its the age and that the older ones KNOW they are doing wrong and the young do not. I ALWAYS knew when I was doing wrong since the age of 5.

[quote]SteelyD wrote:
Is the childless crowd back at it again?

X-- you whip your 4 year old like that uncle whips his teenager?[/quote]

Exactly.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If this many people condone whippings, why all of the ranting when that woman on Dr Phil gave her adopted son hot sauce?

Hot sauce (MILD) is way worse than an ass whipping with a belt or branch?[/quote]

Thank you. Because I knew you’d go there and I was hoping you would. Because this in my way compares to the hot sauce incident.

This dad simply meted out discipline. He didn’t do it as some stupid fucking ritual. It wasn’t prolonged and he wasn’t a bully about it. He got up in that ass and it was over. I’m pretty sure this father doesn’t make it a habit of parading his kid in front of the camera every time he gives him some discipline. And the age of the children were much different. What’s appropriate punishment for a 15 year old boy is NOT necessarily appropriate for an 8 year old boy. You understand that right?[/quote]

Read above. What kid who gets whippings at 15 avoided getting whippings until that age?

Are you making the claim that the people in this thread who got whippings all got them at ages way older than that kid with the hot sauce?

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
[
This dad simply meted out discipline. He didn’t do it as some stupid fucking ritual. [/quote]

How would you KNOW this? Looked to me like he gets that a lot. I say then, it was a ritual.

[quote]Rockscar wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Amiright wrote:

[quote]SILVERDAN7 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If this many people condone whippings, why all of the ranting when that woman on Dr Phil gave her adopted son hot sauce?

Hot sauce (MILD) is way worse than an ass whipping with a belt or branch?[/quote]

First thought is one was a 6 or 7 year old kid the other was a teenager looked at least 14. While I am not a huge fan o psych. as a science, I do think one of the things it has right is development. The kid in the hot sauce video was still at an age where he has some undeveloped characteristics, like apathy. The fourteen year old DOES know better, the five year old might, but not necessarily.
[/quote]

x2 The age makes a huge difference… I’ve gotten an ear full about this type of thing from my friend who does human development research and what not. Some of its actually pretty interesting but most imo is pretty garbage. [/quote]

But my point is, how does one justify whipping a kid that age (because I am going to assume that the people in this thread claiming they got whippings didn’t have them withheld until they were 15 fucking years old) while acting like hot sauce is a danger? At the age of 7 I got “whippings”. Am I somehow the ONLY one in this thread? If not, then how is hot sauce (MILD) somehow child abuse but a whipping isn’t?[/quote]

They will say its the age and that the older ones KNOW they are doing wrong and the young do not. I ALWAYS knew when I was doing wrong since the age of 5.
[/quote]

Me too. I am also aware that kids are not dummies at that age. they are more like sponges soaking up everything around them. What 5-7 year old is incapable of knowing right from wrong?

[quote]Rockscar wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
[
This dad simply meted out discipline. He didn’t do it as some stupid fucking ritual. [/quote]

How would you KNOW this? Looked to me like he gets that a lot. I say then, it was a ritual. [/quote]

Also agreed. That "15 year old"s reaction implied that he was used to that. His actual whipping didn’t even look like it hurt but his reaction showed fear from it being done before.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Amiright wrote:

[quote]SILVERDAN7 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If this many people condone whippings, why all of the ranting when that woman on Dr Phil gave her adopted son hot sauce?

Hot sauce (MILD) is way worse than an ass whipping with a belt or branch?[/quote]

First thought is one was a 6 or 7 year old kid the other was a teenager looked at least 14. While I am not a huge fan o psych. as a science, I do think one of the things it has right is development. The kid in the hot sauce video was still at an age where he has some undeveloped characteristics, like apathy. The fourteen year old DOES know better, the five year old might, but not necessarily.
[/quote]

x2 The age makes a huge difference… I’ve gotten an ear full about this type of thing from my friend who does human development research and what not. Some of its actually pretty interesting but most imo is pretty garbage. [/quote]

But my point is, how does one justify whipping a kid that age (because I am going to assume that the people in this thread claiming they got whippings didn’t have them withheld until they were 15 fucking years old) while acting like hot sauce is a danger? At the age of 7 I got “whippings”. Am I somehow the ONLY one in this thread? If not, then how is hot sauce (MILD) somehow child abuse but a whipping isn’t?[/quote]

You are STILL trying to reduce that whole context and texture of that video to “hot sauce”. Really, you are more intelligent than that. The two videos do not even compare. Not even close. Surely you can make a better argument than this.

[quote]Rockscar wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Amiright wrote:

[quote]SILVERDAN7 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If this many people condone whippings, why all of the ranting when that woman on Dr Phil gave her adopted son hot sauce?

Hot sauce (MILD) is way worse than an ass whipping with a belt or branch?[/quote]

First thought is one was a 6 or 7 year old kid the other was a teenager looked at least 14. While I am not a huge fan o psych. as a science, I do think one of the things it has right is development. The kid in the hot sauce video was still at an age where he has some undeveloped characteristics, like apathy. The fourteen year old DOES know better, the five year old might, but not necessarily.
[/quote]

x2 The age makes a huge difference… I’ve gotten an ear full about this type of thing from my friend who does human development research and what not. Some of its actually pretty interesting but most imo is pretty garbage. [/quote]

But my point is, how does one justify whipping a kid that age (because I am going to assume that the people in this thread claiming they got whippings didn’t have them withheld until they were 15 fucking years old) while acting like hot sauce is a danger? At the age of 7 I got “whippings”. Am I somehow the ONLY one in this thread? If not, then how is hot sauce (MILD) somehow child abuse but a whipping isn’t?[/quote]

They will say its the age and that the older ones KNOW they are doing wrong and the young do not. I ALWAYS knew when I was doing wrong since the age of 5.
[/quote]

NO. Wrong. I still don’t think many people would be shocked and outraged if the 7 year old suffered a brief, to-the-point spanking and along with “counseling”. People were shocked by the ritual of it…the prolonged coldness of her “parenting”…people were shocked by the texture of the entire incident.

Like I said in an earlier post, I think that even those that object to corporal punishment would not react so viscerally if the punishment was meted out and done with. You cannot ignore details and context if you want to compare A to B.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If this many people condone whippings, why all of the ranting when that woman on Dr Phil gave her adopted son hot sauce?

Hot sauce (MILD) is way worse than an ass whipping with a belt or branch?[/quote]

Thank you. Because I knew you’d go there and I was hoping you would. Because this in my way compares to the hot sauce incident.

This dad simply meted out discipline. He didn’t do it as some stupid fucking ritual. It wasn’t prolonged and he wasn’t a bully about it. He got up in that ass and it was over. I’m pretty sure this father doesn’t make it a habit of parading his kid in front of the camera every time he gives him some discipline. And the age of the children were much different. What’s appropriate punishment for a 15 year old boy is NOT necessarily appropriate for an 8 year old boy. You understand that right?[/quote]

Read above. What kid who gets whippings at 15 avoided getting whippings until that age?

Are you making the claim that the people in this thread who got whippings all got them at ages way older than that kid with the hot sauce?[/quote]

Not at all. If you want to spank you child, I think that’s a personal decision and within a parent’s rights, as long as it does not cross over into “beating” your child.

I said after I posted that, that if the little kid in the other video had been spanked and yelled at, even the hardcore anti-corporal punishment contingent in that audience would not have reacted so emotionally. You can’t compare A to B and reduce it to “hot sauce” and ignore all the other details and texture.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

[quote]Rockscar wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]Amiright wrote:

[quote]SILVERDAN7 wrote:

[quote]Professor X wrote:
If this many people condone whippings, why all of the ranting when that woman on Dr Phil gave her adopted son hot sauce?

Hot sauce (MILD) is way worse than an ass whipping with a belt or branch?[/quote]

First thought is one was a 6 or 7 year old kid the other was a teenager looked at least 14. While I am not a huge fan o psych. as a science, I do think one of the things it has right is development. The kid in the hot sauce video was still at an age where he has some undeveloped characteristics, like apathy. The fourteen year old DOES know better, the five year old might, but not necessarily.
[/quote]

x2 The age makes a huge difference… I’ve gotten an ear full about this type of thing from my friend who does human development research and what not. Some of its actually pretty interesting but most imo is pretty garbage. [/quote]

But my point is, how does one justify whipping a kid that age (because I am going to assume that the people in this thread claiming they got whippings didn’t have them withheld until they were 15 fucking years old) while acting like hot sauce is a danger? At the age of 7 I got “whippings”. Am I somehow the ONLY one in this thread? If not, then how is hot sauce (MILD) somehow child abuse but a whipping isn’t?[/quote]

They will say its the age and that the older ones KNOW they are doing wrong and the young do not. I ALWAYS knew when I was doing wrong since the age of 5.
[/quote]

NO. Wrong. I still don’t think many people would be shocked and outraged if the 7 year old suffered a brief, to-the-point spanking and along with “counseling”. People were shocked by the ritual of it…the prolonged coldness of her “parenting”…people were shocked by the texture of the entire incident.

Like I said in an earlier post, I think that even those that object to corporal punishment would not react so viscerally if the punishment was meted out and done with. You cannot ignore details and context if you want to compare A to B. [/quote]

Which would make those people hypocrites. You are either against all physical punishment or for it when raising a kid as long as it does no long term damage. You can NOT be FOR whippings on a 7 year old but against MILD hot sauce. You don’t even know anything about the “ritual” in either case. You saw a video in each case that only shows a brief period in time.

No disrespect to anyone. But I’m not getting drawn into this debate again. I’m sorry for even responding. If you think the two videos are comparable, I’m pretty sure nothing I will say will change any minds. There is an entire internet reaction of rage to the “hot sauce” video and I’m pretty sure there will be no such reaction to this video. They ARE different.

Abuse is probably alot of like indecency. We can’t always define it, but we can usually pick it out when we see it. The hot sauce video, although not “overt” abuse, certainly flirts with the line. This video, although not my personal parenting style, does not shock my sensibilities. Kid got a whooping - not a beating.

As for people being bleeding heart pussies and such, I raised two boys, both never in serious trouble, respectful and enrolled in college. Their mother can probably claim more credit than I, but they didn’t grow up getting beatings and I never laid a glove on either of them. Now I have a 5 year old. And we work on important things like respect and manners.

He lies, like all kids lie, and he gets to know that his father does not approve of lies. I don’t see a day where we’ll need to march off to the bathroom for hot sauce and a cold shower. And although this video doesn’t necessarily shock me, I don’t see the day where I’ll put my parenting on world wide display and make a video of me hitting my child with a belt. Aint gonna happen.

Do moments come along where I feel the need to reach out and swat my little guy on his ass to get his attention? Yes. But only to “reboot” him so that we can speak. And then we hug, I tell him I love him, reinforce the message and we move on. If that makes me a pussy, well then send me my thong and don’t forget to order them XL.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

Which would make those people hypocrites. You are either against all physical punishment or for it when raising a kid as long as it does no long term damage. You can NOT be FOR whippings on a 7 year old but against MILD hot sauce. You don’t even know anything about the “ritual” in either case. You saw a video in each case that only shows a brief period in time. [/quote]

You want it to be black and white, because it’s easier to simply say, “if A is wrong, then B must be wrong”. Your argument is not more clever than that. Sorry, it doesn’t work that way. You can do two identical things and removing context, they ARE identical. However, adding context can make them quite different. He wasn’t sent off for hot sauce either.

We both know that. He was bullied, hot sauced and forced into a cold shower. This father was upset. He yelled. He punished. It was over. I don’t necessarily agree with either as I have just posted in more detail, but they are very different incidents. Very.

This is a semi related thought… because my knowledge of the hot sauce incident isn’t very good sense I haven’t read into it etc… other then this thread.(earlier comment was just based on severity of punishment based vs age and understanding etc… blah blah)

If this hot sauce ordeal was carried out over an extended period of time… as in spank or whatever… hot sauce and yelling… then shower… or whatever order it went in. Basically taking 20 or so minutes to complete(obviously guessing). Couldn’t that be compared to torture. Dripping water on your forehead may not be very physically damaging but do it over a course or 20+ min and you sure as hell will start to go crazy…

Also not from any direct experience sense I have no children. From my understanding and as others have also said this sort of punishment is supposed to be quick and to the point as this video pretty much depicts… Where the hot sauce ordeal isn’t.

another side comment because I watched the video again. I like how the kid was about to get angry but the uncle realized and put that to rest quickly. Kids getting older and more daring lol…

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
No disrespect to anyone. But I’m not getting drawn into this debate again. I’m sorry for even responding. If you think the two videos are comparable, I’m pretty sure nothing I will say will change any minds. There is an entire internet reaction of rage to the “hot sauce” video and I’m pretty sure there will be no such reaction to this video. They ARE different.
[/quote]

The only difference is their age. They are both being physically punished in ways that are not causing scars to last. Internet Rage does not make the reaction right. Many people seemed to be against her religious affiliation more than anything. I know of tons of people who got raised getting whippings with extension cords and branches, all of which would cause a stir if they were fucking video taped for a national audience.

Either all of those people were raised by parents that should have had their children taken away…or some of you are just being flat out ridiculous.

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
No disrespect to anyone. But I’m not getting drawn into this debate again. I’m sorry for even responding. If you think the two videos are comparable, I’m pretty sure nothing I will say will change any minds. There is an entire internet reaction of rage to the “hot sauce” video and I’m pretty sure there will be no such reaction to this video. They ARE different.
[/quote]

The only difference is their age. They are both being physically punished in ways that are not causing scars to last. Internet Rage does not make the reaction right. Many people seemed to be against her religious affiliation more than anything. I know of tons of people who got raised getting whippings with extension cords and branches, all of which would cause a stir if they were fucking video taped for a national audience.

Either all of those people were raised by parents that should have had their children taken away…or some of you are just being flat out ridiculous.

[/quote]

Yeah. I had a childhood friend that got whipped with extension cords too. The State came and took him away. Never saw him again. Are you even allowing for the possibility that it is wrong or, are you so locked into this dogmatic “I saw it happen, it happened to me and I’m alright” mentality that you cannot see any other perspective? As humans, we can endure all sorts of insults to our body and mind. Whether we are “okay” is always a question of relativity. And for the record, continued and repeated beatings with an extension cord, if reported, WOULD probably always result in the State removing the child.

And if the only difference is indeed their respective ages, it is nonetheless a difference that matters. It’s not the only difference in my opinion, but opinions differ.

I didn’t know I was prone to being “flat out ridiculous”. I have raised two children and am raising a third.

It was pointed out in another article about the mormon mom that her husband claimed he got the cold shower routine from his experience in the military. He claims they were used to get your “attention”. The problem with that is that 7 year old boys are not normally accepted into the military. I’m pretty sure that a technique used on 18 year old or older recruits and soldiers is probably not appropriate for a 7 year old boy.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
It was pointed out in another article about the mormon mom that her husband claimed he got the cold shower routine from his experience in the military. He claims they were used to get your “attention”. The problem with that is that 7 year old boys are not normally accepted into the military. I’m pretty sure that a technique used on 18 year old or older recruits and soldiers is probably not appropriate for a 7 year old boy. [/quote]

But whipping that same kid with a belt is acceptable and appropriate? Who decided these rules? What specifically was the damage caused by a cold shower? He wasn’t submerged in water. He had water sprinkling on him while he sat in the tub. How do you relate that to water boarding?

[quote]Professor X wrote:

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:
It was pointed out in another article about the mormon mom that her husband claimed he got the cold shower routine from his experience in the military. He claims they were used to get your “attention”. The problem with that is that 7 year old boys are not normally accepted into the military. I’m pretty sure that a technique used on 18 year old or older recruits and soldiers is probably not appropriate for a 7 year old boy. [/quote]

But whipping that same kid with a belt is acceptable and appropriate? Who decided these rules? What specifically was the damage caused by a cold shower? He wasn’t submerged in water. He had water sprinkling on him while he sat in the tub. How do you relate that to water boarding?[/quote]

I never said whipping that same kid with a belt is acceptable and appropriate. Where did I say or imply that whipping a 7 year old boy with a belt was appropriate?

Who decided rules? They are called “social norms” and laws. When you have children, trying whipping them with extension cords and such as your means of punishment and see how long you have your children.

As for the cold shower, a few points. First, how did you go from “cold shower” as a military technique to “water boarding”?? My point was that the “cold shower” routine was one the father borrowed from his time in the military and he adopted it at home. My response was that what was appropriate for 18 year old and up recruits and enlisted men is hardly appropriate for a 7 year old boy. Did you miss that? Or was I not clear?

Now you ask what “damage” was done to the child by the cold shower? No physical damage. But is physical damage the only damage that is done to a human? Can’t you mistreat someone, or psychologically abuse someone and render damage upon them?

Are you really telling me that because he wasn’t “physically harmed” that the punishment is okay? Is that what you are saying? So, following your logic, we should be able to apply this punishment to younger children. Would you be comfortable shoving your 4 year old in the cold shower for lying? Your 3 year old? Because 3 and 4 year old kids know what lying is too. My 4 year old just got done lying to me and he knew exactly what he was doing. He had just uttered the word “faggot” which he has apparently picked up from his mother’s younger brothers. He knew it was a bad word. Would the cold shower be okay for this offense?

Anyway, I can’t believe anyone that defends it. That pretty much means you and I are doomed to agree to disagree or, endlessly debate the minutia of these respective events, past experiences and philosophies and, at the end of the day, neither of us will move from our beliefs. And maybe, just maybe, when you have a child - that little living breathing piece of you that you love above all else, you might just feel differently about some of the parenting methods that you have witnessed and declared “okay”. Or, maybe you will just perpetuate them.

[quote]TheBodyGuard wrote:

Who decided rules? They are called “social norms” and laws. When you have children, trying whipping them with extension cords and such as your means of punishment and see how long you have your children.[/quote]

Yes, and social norms change over time. Spare the rod and spoil the child is something most Christians should be aware of and agree with…yet suddenly this is now wrong?

[quote]

As for the cold shower, a few points. First, how did you go from “cold shower” as a military technique to “water boarding”?? My point was that the “cold shower” routine was one the father borrowed from his time in the military and he adopted it at home. My response was that what was appropriate for 18 year old and up recruits and enlisted men is hardly appropriate for a 7 year old boy. Did you miss that? Or was I not clear?[/quote]

? They sat the boy in the tub and lightly sprinkled water on him. What military do you know of that is only doing that? They by no means treated him like an adult or used any “advanced military techniques” on him. They sprinkled water on him. It doesn’t matter where he got the idea from.

[quote]

Now you ask what “damage” was done to the child by the cold shower? No physical damage. But is physical damage the only damage that is done to a human? Can’t you mistreat someone, or psychologically abuse someone and render damage upon them? [/quote]

WTF? Did your parents spank you? To claim that is causing emotional damage would mean spanking could do the same. Do you or do you not agree with spanking?