http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,353944,00.html
Before bitching that it is Fox, make sure the story is false. If not let us discuss the despicable behavior of the UN and ponder why we have not dissolved this vile organization.
[quote]pat wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,353944,00.html
Before bitching that it is Fox, make sure the story is false. If not let us discuss the despicable behavior of the UN and ponder why we have not dissolved this vile organization.[/quote]
The UN was supposed to get people around the world to stop thinking like nationalists and begin to think like globalists. It got turned into an instrument to further the agendas of vile people, especially by giving a public forum to creatures like Hogo Chavez. Fortunately, most people have lost the idealistic view of the UN and see it for what it is.
I only have 3 little words for the UN and it’s naive believers: FOOD-FOR-OIL (program)
What do you all care? It’s not like the US has ever listened to what the UN says.
[quote]lixy wrote:
What do you all care? It’s not like the US has ever listened to what the UN says.[/quote]
What ever, we forked over $775 million bucks over because of their little scam.
[quote]lixy wrote:
What do you all care? It’s not like the US has ever listened to what the UN says.[/quote]
The USA was supposed to be a model for the UN to follow — you know, voting, human rights, respect for the individual. However, tin pot dictators being in the majority, this noble purpose was perverted into a scam. So, we should follow what tin pot dictators want?
As for not listening: the UN actually DID condemn Saddam, but were shocked when someone actually DID take them seriously and knock off Saddam. “What?! They have the temerity to actually DO what we voted on 18 times? Don’t those fools in the USA realize we were just posturing for public consumption. Besides, how can we milk Saddam in scams like Oil-for-Food if he’s dead? Crazy Americans!!!”
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
As for not listening: the UN actually DID condemn Saddam, but were shocked when someone actually DID take them seriously and knock off Saddam. “What?! They have the temerity to actually DO what we voted on 18 times? Don’t those fools in the USA realize we were just posturing for public consumption. Besides, how can we milk Saddam in scams like Oil-for-Food if he’s dead? Crazy Americans!!!”
[/quote]
I think that’s the wittiest thing I’ve ever read from you HH.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
lixy wrote:
What do you all care? It’s not like the US has ever listened to what the UN says.
The USA was supposed to be a model for the UN to follow — you know, voting, human rights, respect for the individual. However, tin pot dictators being in the majority, this noble purpose was perverted into a scam. So, we should follow what tin pot dictators want?
As for not listening: the UN actually DID condemn Saddam, but were shocked when someone actually DID take them seriously and knock off Saddam. “What?! They have the temerity to actually DO what we voted on 18 times? Don’t those fools in the USA realize we were just posturing for public consumption. Besides, how can we milk Saddam in scams like Oil-for-Food if he’s dead? Crazy Americans!!!”
[/quote]
And with that, Lixy disappeared from this thread forever.
[quote]pat wrote:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,353944,00.html
Before bitching that it is Fox, make sure the story is false. If not let us discuss the despicable behavior of the UN and ponder why we have not dissolved this vile organization.[/quote]
Maybe because it’s more valuable alive than dead? Do you have the means to dissolve it?
I’m not that interested in how much money the food program has in store or how much they need. What I’d like to know is how much of that money goes for the intended purpose and how much goes for running the organization. Does anyone have any percentages?
The UN is as useful as windows on a moter bike end of story, we should piss it off.