Sad, but true, my friend…sad but true…
It would matter a good deal more if the right would focus on her stances instead of trying to ream her for what she wore to Congress.
Should be a piece of cake to make her a nobody. No idea how they just keep giving her free points…
Well, if you let him sling mud now, it’ll be mostly forgotten before it gets serious. Think about how quickly people forget. Hell, Trump shat on POWs and he has a lot of veteran supporters.
Ya, that’s a good question.
Should be a piece of cake to make her a nobody. No idea how they just keep giving her free points…
Ignoring her would be a start, she’s a first term congresswoman for God’s sake. She’s trolling them magnificently.
She’s trolling them magnificently.
I think it’s inadvertent much like Zep’s trolling.
I wonder if that issue has moved down the ladder far enough to not be a deal breaker?
Good question, @thunderbolt23…
It seems like the greatest battles are occurring on the State Level, as more and more restrictive laws are being pushed (even though they inevitably reach the Federal Courts).
Another way to look at it (at least in some people’s eyes) is that Supreme Court nominations are “abortion fights”.
Ultimately, it is for many people “the” only issue for voting for or against a candidate.
Not for president. She is 29 years old. You have to be 35 to be president (in the US).
Good call, I forgot she was still in her 20s.
Ultimately, it is for many people “the” only issue for voting for or against a candidate.
It’s often the only significant difference between two candidates. How many other issues are there on which an actual candidate is often either “for” or “against?”
Makes absolutely no sense to me. Not even a lil
Fundraising. It takes $1B to get elected US president… Well for Democrats anyway.
Not for president. She is 29 years old. You have to be 35 to be president (in the US).
I know, that’s why I said “very soon” rather than imminently. I could have made that clearer in fairness.
I think it’s inadvertent much like Zep’s trolling.
If you cause your opposition to beclown themselves just be existing, does it truly matter?
She is cuckoo, but she is also attractive and uses social media well. Also, given the granular, and often petty, criticism she is getting, I could see a Trump-esque rise in her popularity.

Also, I would be delighted if this man got a nomination.
Well, if you let him sling mud now, it’ll be mostly forgotten before it gets serious.
As is evident by all the nicknames Trump came up with that sticks to this day? Shit Mufasa posted a pocahantos pic above.
Hell, Trump shat on POWs and he has a lot of veteran supporters
Because vets rarely vote Dem. They vote for the party cuz 2A.
Fundraising. It takes $1B to get elected US president… Well for Democrats anyway.
Fundraising doesn’t happen without a POTUS candidate? That’s news to me.
They seemed to do just fine in 2018 when the RNC nearly doubled the DNCs fundraising and still got dumpsterfucked
As is evident by all the nicknames Trump came up with that sticks to this day? Shit Mufasa posted a pocahantos pic above.
What like Lyin Ted? Aren’t they BFFs now?
The Pocahontas thing is a perfect point, though. He got his jab in, but everyone will forget about that in a few months.
Because vets rarely vote Dem. They vote for the party cuz 2A.
Something like 40% of veteran voters voted for HRC over Trump. To a lesser extent some, like myself, went third party.
What like Lyin Ted? Aren’t they BFFs now?
I’m guessing the Dem nominee won’t be willing to bend over to secure that friendship
The Pocahontas thing is a perfect point, though. He got his jab in, but everyone will forget about that in a few months.
Didnt he call her that like 2 years ago?
Edit: earliest Google can find for me is him starting that in 2016
Something like 40% of veteran voters voted for HRC over Trump. To a lesser extent some, like myself, went third party.
Guy dumps on tons of vets and generals and STILL pulls 60% of the vote? That kinda proves my point doesn’t it?
Edit2: the draft dodging bone spurs guy no less
Didnt he call her that like 2 years ago?
I don’t know when it was, my point is he got the jab in when she announced (The 1/2024th or whatever joke), but it will be ancient history in a year.
It’ll lose it’s bite is what I’m saying. Once you hear “lyin Ted” or “Crooked Hillary” 30 times you just kind of subconsciously ignore it. At least I do.
Guy dumps on tons of vets and generals and STILL pulls 60% of the vote? That kinda proves my point doesn’t it?
The impact of the Mattis fiasco remains to be seen, but I think it proves my point, not yours. 38% vote Dem. I wouldn’t consider that “rarely vote Dem.”
On the other hand, I said, “Hell, Trump shat on POWs and he has a lot of veteran support”. Doesn’t that prove my point, that people have short-term memories?
I don’t know when it was, my point is he got the jab in when she announcement (The 1/2024th or whatever joke), but it will be ancient history in a year.
I’m happy to agree to disagree. It’s still used to this day by people I’m aware of and it’s a 3 year deep nickname.
30 times you just kind of subconsciously ignore it. At least I do.
You’re a good man ![]()
38% vote Dem. I wouldn’t consider that “rarely vote Dem.”
Republicans sent a draft dodger that disrespected POWs, our entire military, and continues to this day. 38 feels pretty terrible tbh. Personally I attribute a lot of it to 2A 1 issue voters
On the other hand, I said, “Hell, Trump shat on POWs and he has a lot of veteran support”. Doesn’t that prove my point, that people have short-term memories?
I think it means they just generally don’t care about how much he disrespects the military when compared to their 2A views. I guess we’ll see in 2020
