Watch it! Oprah is not just ‘some black woman.’
2 Likes
I bet you find Oprah more attractive than melania too
Jeff Sessions attempts to bring the dems back to reality.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Tuesday said suggestions he met with Russian officials to influence the 2016 election are like a story written by Lewis Carroll.
Sessions’ simile was perhaps prompted by Sen. Tom Cotton’s (R-AR) remark that Democrats went “down lots of other rabbit trails” in their lines of questioning as Sessions testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee.
“It’s just like through the looking glass. I mean, what is this?” Sessions said.
Sessions said he “explained how in good faith” he claimed he had not met with Russian officials.
“They were suggesting I as a surrogate had been meeting continuously with Russians,” Sessions said. “I said I didn’t meet with them. And now, the next thing you know, I’m accused of some reception, plotting some sort of influence campaign for the American election. It’s just beyond my capability to understand.”
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/sessions-through-the-looking-glass
I sure do. Real self made success is so much more attractive than botox.
2 Likes
Haven’t heard much from @thunderbolt23 on his opinion of the removal of statues of the father’s of confederacy.
My guess is he opposes the removal
Hahahahahaha. You’ve been saying for multiple posts:
Such confidence in your statments, despite them being false. I didn’t quote anything or you, I didn’t mention your name or point out how “terribly wrong” you were. You made that up.
So, either you were lying hoping I wouldn’t review the posts in the thread, or your reading comprehension sucks. Not sure which I believe in light of your history.
Regardless, you’ve beclowned yourself yet again by peddling something that wasn’t true.
1 Like
I actually agree with Raj Id rather bang Melania too… This is not political as bros we should cross party lines and just admit shes way hotter…
I wasnt aware Oprah was getting on money… I thought you had to be a former prez
As I said you reposted a post from another poster. And added this
More name calling from the king of T Natoin trash talk. Continue on TB the thread still has possibilities but if you try you can make it into your usual dumpster fire.
Oh, I meant to include this in my response - how hilarious is your arrogant posturing saying this having been exposed as, uh, not even knowing what is going on?
But that’s not what you said until you got called on it. Can credibility actually measure in negative numbers?
1 Like
As long as you continue to take threads off course and no one cares I will defend myself.
Remember that time not long ago when you said that Hillary didn’t want to raise my taxes? Do ya? Do ya?
Yeah…then I posted an article which quoted her verbatim claiming that she wanted to make those in the upper income bracket pay 4% more. Which proved you wro …wron…wrong! ONCE AGAIN.
How many is that now? I lost track…Let’s see must be at least 6 or is it 7?
Yeah you are a real superstar TB…at least in your own mind and in the minds of your tiny posse.
Ha!
Yes and by now you are a negative 7 I believe.
Going for 8?
Then there was the time that you claimed (agreeing with another poster) that I called “a known conservative on this board a left-leaning liberal”.
But…you couldn’t find where I said any such thing when I challenged you. It jus turned out to be one more of your blatant attempts to attack me and…YOU GUESSED IT take yet one more thread off course.
Here’s the problem, Zeb - this is a lie. I never said Hillary didn’t want to raise your taxes. In fact, I expressly recognized she said she wanted to during her campaign. Never said what you say I said. Ever. Go read the exchange.
Seriously, is it pathological? Why are you so damn dishonest?
That’s how you want to remember it. But as I recall we went back and forth several times and you only walked away when I posted an article which clearly quoted her saying that she wanted to hike the taxes 4%.
But, that’s okay TB we all know you can never ever under any circumstances admit that you are wrong.
I wonder why that is?
Oh well…shall I bring up a few more?
Obvious
Then there was the time that TB accused me of saying “all politicians lie” simply to defend Donald Trump. Then it was discovered that I had said that long before Trump ever got the nomination. That was another time that you just slinked away from the thread…never admitting that you had erred. But…that is what you do.
TB …you are simply wrong so many more times than you are right.
Here’s the exchange:
You said if Hillary had been elected, you’d be paying 5% more in taxes. I explained that wouldn’t be true because there is a GOP-controlled Congress. I never said Hillary never said she would raise taxes. That’s a lie, merely being offered to change the subject from your most recent self-beclowning.
EDIT: I can’t seem to post the link to the thread. It begins at response 793.
How about the time when you took yet another thread off course a couple months ago by insulting yet another poster. Do you remember that? No, probably not you do it so much…what’s one more thread right?
Let’s see you said the following to this particular poster:
-
Learn to read
-
Do something to improve your IQ
-
Hey Dumbass
Eh…there’s more but I’m sure everyone gets the idea. Sure I’m far from perfect but the one who likes to think he’s perfect sure does do plenty of things wrong around here. And happens to be wrong plenty of times. Not that he will ever admit it.
You said that she would never raise my taxes. I said she had every intention to do it and proved it by posting the article in question.
You are smooth…so smooth. But the fact is you are so very wrong.