You could start a thread based on what you have provided here called “Is it racist to be racist?” then back up your argument that it isn’t racist to be racist using EDs posts on how races among our species don’t exist- therefore it is not racist to be racist. Then use your own to show that it is actually patriotic.
See that? It would actually behoove you to agree with him.
Unfortunately, there is no emogee to indicate that this post is Bizarro world satyre.
Mine would be “a person who shows or feels prejudice against people of other races , or believes that a particular race is superior to another”
As for my feelings on the matter, there’s a lovely two-line exchange in the movie Gettysburg that sums it up fairly well:
"Colonel Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain: Tell me something, Buster… What do you think of Negroes?
Sergeant ‘Buster’ Kilrain: Well, if you mean the race, I don’t really know. This is not a thing to be ashamed of. The thing is, you cannot judge a race. Any man who judges by the group is a pea-wit. You take men one at a time."
Eh, mine is pretty harsh, and probably pretty far from the typical way that its used, but that is beside the point. My definition in a bubble means nothing. The conflict occurs when you have two people with different definitions.
Then anyone who isn’t in support of open borders to all races of people is racist. Japan, South Korea, Israel are all racist by the first half of that definition.
You’ve also called Aragorn a racist, because he believes it’s okay for countries to regulate who they let in.
*Hatred of other races or belief of total superiority or inferiority of races.
*I will add anything that is fact based by definition is not racist, nor statements of fact. If I say Sub-Saharan’s Africans from West Africa can run fast due to above average amounts of fast twitch muscle fibres that isn’t racist.
And there is zero substantiation of Trump’s claims that Obama wiretapped him or otherwise used domestic or foreign intelligence services to surveil Trump.