Trump: The First 100 Days

almost got it …

3 Likes
3 Likes

Hahaha

He’s referring to Merkel who was tapped by Obama

Yeah, check her expression after he said it.

1 Like

Outstanding.

6 Likes

I like how he says “perhaps” because he still hasn’t found any evidence yet. Must be rough when people actually check to see if the things you say are accurate QQ

1 Like

Yep. You’ve now had the intelligence agencies, both congressional ICs, GCHQ and even Fox News saying there were no taps. Yet here we are.

2 Likes

SAYS WHO? :grin:

(I’ve been waiting to use that for months!)

2 Likes

This also happens to be why almost everybody does not read or analyze scientific studies accurately, if they care about them at all.

Research is predominantly different shades of gray fading into black and white, and people feel the need for ONLY black and white.

4 Likes

No. Just fucking…NO.

Good fucking lord

4 Likes

Sort of like a circus. A really deranged circus.

2 Likes

As Anglo-Celtic-Germanic descent people (those who breathed life into American ideals) are replaced, will their ideals wither from neglect and misuse in the care of their replacements?

We will find out in ~20 years though signs are beginning to show

The way things are going one day the Constitution will be deemed unconstitutional

Or, in raj’s case, “only white” would be good.

2 Likes

Do you think it’s immoral to conduct scientific research on the interplay between genes and behavior?

If raj were to say “l prefer x ethnicity over y.” - l suspect it would nullify most of his opposition.

No, and a significant portion of research interfaces between psychology/genetics, or behavioral genetics which is a discipline and field unto its own.

That’s not what you are doing however. Not even close.

In the sense that everything would be out in the open instead of hiding behind vague, plausible deniability with a tinge of goal post moving, then yes it would. In the sense that anybody would approve of this, no it would not nullify anything.

3 Likes

I have said repeatedly that I oppose the radical demographic change occurring in America.

Please correct me if I’m wrong, but aren’t you part and parcel of the “radical demographic change occurring in America”?

The “warrior gene” is well studied and I posted some of research conducted in that area to support the over-arching point I was making. I have no idea what you’re crowing about.

But what’s more telling is your deafening silence on the ignorant in this thread who hold the anti-science belief that race is a social construct. Imagine if this belief found it’s way into medicine? People would be improperly treated and in many cases die if the doctor didn’t take into account the patient’s race. I can see the future, soon people will be calling Sphygmomanometers ‘culturally biased’ because they show different races have different blood pressure levels on average.