Option 3 (if you lean right) she went on TV and misspoke. Sort of like Obama misspeaking about “you can keep your own doctor” Yeah…I lean right so it was a lie. You lean left so he basically misspoke.
I don’t identify with either party enough to say I “lean” in that direction. Even if I did I would reject that basic premise. If Obama mispeaks, I call it a lie. If Trump misspeaks, I call it a lie.
Trying to justify a lie (unintentional or otherwise) is to not hold people accountable for their actions/words.
If you say anything at all bad about anything from the RIGHT, zeb accuses you of leaning LEFT.
zeb spent 99% of election season calling @anon50325502 (who is quite conservative, and who openly and directly stated several times that he strongly disliked HRC) of being in the tank for Democrats any time he said anything at all bad about Donald Trump.
Re-read Option 1 and zeb’s Option 3 again. They’re the same thing to anyone but zeb.
Oh I know. It was a rhetorical question, mostly.
We have allocated way, way too much money to the F-35, the Zumwalt class Destroyer (looks suspiciously like the Confederate Merrimack ironclad), the Ford class Carrier, and missions without a fully developed objective, including closure.
edit The weapons systems are taking so long to bring into operation, they risk being outdated before being used. Well if they can ever actually be used.
It’s way more than that. Pressure is an understatement. Many live under threat, not pressure. Whether it’s cultural or not, does not make it right. The attitudes of immigrants coming from cultures who treat women like garbage don’t leave those attitudes at the border. And they are enforced in cruel ways as if they were still embedded in said cultures. Thus, the hijab is a symbol of the lower status of women in a patriarchy. They will speak only when given permission, they will follow their men.
What about the American men who beat their wives and cheat on them, or think women are just objects and should be grabbed by the p@ssy? Or have sexually assaulted women, and then became president?
Anyways your handle suggests you might be Jewish. I always find it odd when someone who is Jewish stands up for Islam when a pillar of the faith is anti-Semitism
I don’t believe the founding fathers had any intention of a multicultural society. When they wrote that, it was intended to reflect freedom of religion between different flavors of Christianity.
I am certain, you have always kept your locker room talk, clean and pure. And I a sure you have never heard guys talk about pussy and make jokes about pussy, ever.
I have heard even women say some vile shit that even made me blush. So keep your sanctimony to yourself. You may be pure as the fresh driven snow and indeed, have cast that stone, but vile talk is nothing new.
I have heard it in various forms most of my life and I don’t know any of the guys who said those things, nor myself, who has said some vile stuff in private actually mean other than to try to be funny.
After reading your posts I’m assuming you’re a troll, or a robot, or a trollbot, but I’ll answer anyway. I’m not religious in any way, never have been. I also am not standing up for Islam any more than any other religion, I’m pointing out that men of ALL faiths can be terrible people and do despicable things.
Absolutely. While I do not follow any religion and have my own beliefs on the topic, I don’t care what people believe and I feel all religions are equally as wonderful and ridiculous, until they start killing people in the name of it, which every religion does, has, and unfortunately will continue to do so until humans evolve past religion, which we never might.
I’m not talking about locker room talk, I’m talking about actual sexual harassment and assault. Obviously we’re never going to see eye to eye on anything, that much is clear, no matter what you say or I say. The difference between us is I’m willing to admit that both “sides,” left and right, are full of shit and do despicable things, and you’re not.
Of course they didn’t, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t respect all religions equally, despite the extremists that are present in every religion. Things change over the course of a few hundred years. When the right to bear arms was written down, people also couldn’t get automatic weapons at Walmart.
Because the founding fathers lived in a vastly different day and time than we do.
If you were to judge a bodybuilding competition in 2017 based on the rules of physique competitions in 1787 you would have some pretty awkward results. The same goes for trying to govern 2017 by the exact premises of a 230 year old document. It simply does not directly correlate.
Are there aspects that can? Absolutely! However, much has changed that the founding fathers could not foresee.