Trump using the National Enquirer as his source…I don’t understand how people can turn a blind eye to EVERYTHING he says, yet believe he will do what he has proposed. Mind boggling.
I’d rather have Hillary over a lying narcissit and consipriacy theorist
Conspiracy Theorist? Not sure. But I was thinking more along the lines of having someone to oppose the Democrats after she becomes President. The GoP will now decay into kook status. Unless, Republicans leaders largely disown their own nominee. I’m not the person to blame, either. It’s simply a factual observation. The GoP is running a National Enquirer, Alex Jones, Birther, Conspiracy theorist, crude misogynist that has lied about his stance on various (despite the record) issues over and over again. He is now the face of the GoP. And that’s a non-winner.
One of the bigger lies…Hillary is going to chew this clownshoes up.
“I was against the Iraq war when Hillary voted for it!”
“Really? Roll the Howard stern audio!”
The Media Keeps Letting Trump Get Away With His Iraq Lie
Now, why do they keep letting him get away with it? Why have they kept their powder dry, so far…Anyone want to bet that as soon as he’s the nominee, head to head with Clinton…BAM…this recording, and many others on a number of issues, on his views of women, his support of the Clintons, etc., will suddenly start showing up everywhere?
Her constant harassment aimed at the women who claimed Bill had an affair with, who was quick to dismiss their claims, and now suggests that we should believe all women when they claim sexual assault.
Elizabeth Warren also exposed her two-timing ways when she changed her vote in bankruptcy reform, all in the name of taking money for her Senate campaign.
OR… maybe, the GoP leaders don’t represent the GoP.
I’m not sure who’s blaming you…
I actually think that BOTH the GoP and Dems are split into two sub parties. I know it’s easy to follow the NeverTrump bandwagon, because everyone in the media voices this, but maybe consider that a large, unheard population, is secretly rooting for Trump. (evidenced by the fact he is winning) It’s actually easier to ‘identify’ as a black-jewish-4 year old-dragon than it is to say you support Trump. A bit of a survivorship bias: assuming that because those who have large followings don’t support Trump, this must equate to general consensus. just my observation
Possibly, if Trump wasn’t so boisterous, the media would notice that Bernie supporters are HellnoforHill and see her as just as evil.
Drew you’re a nice guy but it’s obvious that you’ve not read any of Clinton’s history. Start with Whitewater and work your way up to Benghazi.
I know there is plenty of anti Trump rhetoric on this board and I can’t say the guy doesn’t deserve it. But…let me just say read up on your Clinton history. Then get back to me about why some call her “evil”.
I actually think that BOTH the GoP and Dems are split into two sub parties. I know it’s easy to follow the NeverTrump bandwagon, because everyone in the media voices this, but maybe consider that a large, unheard population, is secretly rooting for Trump. (evidenced by the fact he is winning) It’s actually easier to ‘identify’ as a black-jewish-4 year old-dragon than it is to say you support Trump. A bit of a survivorship bias: assuming that because those who have large followings don’t support Trump, this must equate to general consensus. just my observation
Possibly, if Trump wasn’t so boisterous, the media would notice that Bernie supporters are HellnoforHill and see her as just as evil.[/quote]
Nope. Trump is notably more hated than Hillary. Only David Duke beats him, and barely…David Duke…
Wait until the video and audio really start rolling in the General.
Zeb, you can’t blame the guy, the media has picked the faults of Teddy and Don. Let’s be honest, Bernie is a nice old man; that’s why he resonates with Millenials. But, his ‘niceness’ is a pitfall. He isn’t slamming Hillz around like he should. As someone who has recently watched an email scandal unfold during elections (RE: Gov. Kitzhaber and his GF in Oregon), I can only hope that the 49 other states learn from Oregon. We knew ‘Johnny be good’ was corrupt, but we voted for him any way… Something about ‘a moderate republican could never be CEO of Oregon’.
Regardless of whether Teddy or Don win the ticket, I think Hillary is in for a wild ride. There isn’t much likelihood, I can see, of a new scandal coming out of their camps. Whereas, Clinton has gone untouched this whole primary election cycle.
In the end I’ll be the one laughing. I’ll be here on election day asking, "how in the world did you think a conspiracy nut, whose latest offering was to imply that Cruz’ father was involved with Oswald, wink-wink, “before the shooting?”
Everyone will be amused. Amused that the GoP base officially embraced kook status.
[quote=“Sloth’s credible Link, post:75, topic:216757”]
METHODOLOGY – This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by landline and cell phone April 6-10, 2016, in English and Spanish, among a random national sample of 1,010 adults, including 290 Republicans, 333 Democrats and 339 independents.[/quote]
If I want a representative sample of how 150 million people will vote, how many people should I poll? Answer: Apparently, only .0006%.