Um, no.
If your question is does “proof without evidence” always equals faith, my answer would be no
Fwiw, I don’t think flat earthers are making faith based decisions. If it was, being wrong would be universally faith driven (while funny, I wouldn’t go that far).
Belief without proof, fixed
Same answer.
If belief without proof REQUIRES faith, wouldn’t that mean faith was the driver for every incorrect assumption in human history?
So faith is literally the spawn of being wrong?
The Bible isn’t portrayed as the actual word of God?
How many people say they knew God was real when they saw the birth of their child?
The definition of faith is above. And it fits perfectly my statements.
Not proof, so faith.
There are several definitions of faith. You linked to several of them.
I quoted the definition. 2b if you need further assistance.
DefinitionS.
1 Like
So you DO think every single incorrect assumption in human history is because of faith?
Omg, you are a troll. I quoted the applicable definition, 2b.
Do you agree with merriam Webster?
Yes then. Belief without proof requires faith but not all instances of faith lack proof.
No. The definition is that faith IS a belief without proof.
No. That is ONE definition of faith. Hint: the fact it’s 2b tells you there is a 2a.
Also, it’s not that faith is belief without proof but that belief without proof is faith.
Is there anything resembling a point to settling this part of the debate?
2 Likes
…for which there is NO proof.
He’s trying to set up a gotcha moment…that never happens.
No crap there is a 2a, I specifically noted this is 2b…
What are you even on about?