Are the claims of “blocking the site” by European Parliament overblown, then? Could an average Frenchman easily access the supposedly blocked site?
Is it just people in France who can’t view the twitter files webpage? From what the X post was implying, the European Parliament was censoring it, and isn’t Finland subject to that?
Or do you just use a VPN to bypass that stuff?
Or am I misunderstanding the situation entirely?
I love this person.
Not as an individual or as a politician, but as a source of MANY overlapping conspiracy theories that aren’t really conspiracies.
The whole Macron situation makes hiring a pornstar as your hooker, paying her hush money through your attorney, then 8 years later somehow being convicted of 34 felonies for bookkeeping errors related to it seem downright normal.
Of course.
EU can’t decide about national legislature about freedom of speech.
What really seems to set our Constitution apart is, in my opinion, directly connected to the idea that our rights come from God, Jesus, The Creator, or any other potential synonym, even if you are a hard atheist.
This idea is actually reflected in the federal government’s structure, where it is extremely difficult to change the core ideas of The Bill of Rights, and they are enshrined to a degree that sets the USA apart from Canada or anywhere in Europe.
Maine’s Constitution is similarly stubborn, which is why we have experienced most of the woke lefts’ public policy wish list here, but not gun control. Maine’s Constitution also references God in the first paragraph.
Maine’s Constitution doesn’t leave any wiggle room for a muskets or militia argument when it comes to gun control, which is why we still have constitutional carry and almost none of the ridiculous gun laws featured in other states that use the public education system to indoctrinate children into transgenderism.
https://legislature.maine.gov/doc/10674
Section 16. To keep and bear arms. Every citizen has a right to keep and bear arms and this right shall never be questioned.
I’m going to France next month. I can try if the link works there.
Like I said it mostly comes down to a semantic argument , if they were truly god given and unalienable, every country would have the same ones which we clearly do not. Lest we mix the two topics you’re never supposed to talk about and this spins off into a religious thread too I’ll make that my thought on it and give you the final word if you so choose.
I’m gonna leave this here just in case anybody needs this.
Hint: if you’re confusing God with Man, you need this.
Everyone has the same inalienable rights, it’s just that some governments use a variety of legal frameworks to deny them, including American governments at times.
My argument is actually secular. It doesn’t matter what you or I believe. The people who laid down the unique legal framework of the USA believed that our human rights came from the Christian conception of God.
Muslims have a similar theological basis for their legal system, but with many notable differences in the resulting legal framework.
I’d like to keep riffing on this idea a bit more, even though I don’t know how to riff on any musical instrument except the kazoo. I’m the guy who just pressed the saxophone keys during band recital and then went on to have the bongo drums taken away from him in a hippie drum circle several years later.
I go on and on about Democratic Socialism because I think it is the right term to describe the ideology of Democrats in 2025, plus a lot of them self-identify as such.
Setting aside the entire insane policy platform of Democratic Socialism for a minute, I think we’re actually in a conflict that’s even more fundamental than an ideological battle. Regardless of what you believe the word “spiritual” to mean, it seems to me that the political battle of 2025 is, at its core, a spiritual conflict. Maybe it always has been.
I 100% agree.
When China rises to be the next global superpower, we can forget about all this nonsense about human rights though. They will give us new definitions to follow.
Kind of weird to say “Our rights don’t come from government…” and then say “…go back and read the words of our Founding Fathers.”
No, it wasn’t. It was to lay out the purpose of government and introduce their reasons for abolishing their governance by Great Britain.
JD Vance is being very clear in his communication regarding the obliteration of the alleged drug smuggling boat.
In 2025, I see fentanyl traffickers as hostile terrorists waging chemical warfare on our population. This ain’t Cheech and Chong smuggling bricks of weed. It is long past time we begin disincentivizing fentanyl with violence.
Krassenstein is a colossal twat.
When can we expect them to go after the U.S. intelligence in bed with the cartels/narco traffickers?
Well, they just cut USAID funding, so I’d say that’s a good start.
Can anyone in here honestly say that if Biden or Obama had started sending the military exclusively into “red cities” and saying they’re about to find out why it’s called the department of WAR that you all would be okay with it ?
No, they can’t. Which is why it’s such a self-fellating hypocritical stance.
Also point me to a red city that is economically productive.
“Sanctuary” cities that give aid and comfort to illegals. Gangbangers, murders, rapists, all who stormed our borders due to the policy blunders of your two favorite points of reference.
You should fix that typo. Its misleading.
For what is worth, I can view it just fine.
If they were under the same conditions as " blue cities"…i.e. inmates running the asylums, no law and order and the nothing is being done to protect the citizens by the local governments…absolutely I would I be ok with it
