Saw them 3 years ago here in St Louis
The terminology lol… but I agree in principle. For instance 10% of women aged 18-25 in the US are on onlyfans (are OF creators) and something like 2-5% of guys are… horrible statistic
I could not believe this but now I’ve seen during career day in HS OF recruiters sometimes hire out booths with the explicit intent of pushing young women into porn (but it’s more “independent” relative to contractual pornography where you shoot videos and wind up hooking to make ends meet outside of the filming)
InSANE that OF is considered female empoerment. It’s actually quite common for OF models to start young, regret it midway through as 99% or so of creators don’t make enough to come close to making ends meet and need to supplement income through working normal jobs and it’s hard to find gainful employment when you do porn… And think of the kids, if you decide to have kids with that kind of lifestyle… “i’ve seen your mom naked” will soon be more than just a schoolyard insult…
1 Like
Only Foreheads… skank ho’s with no real value. Fast money = Slow problems
1 Like
a lot of young people who hop on the OF brigade don’t realize you need marketing and appeal to make money.
The women who become famous from OF generally have a generous social media following before they started doing it… As in think of an attractive teenage vlogger with two million followers who is now legally an adult and capitalizes on it by doing porn.
At the same time the page needs to be kept up and running 24/7 so you need funds to hire people to talk to the subscribers messaging you… This leads to the ‘content creator’ (I use that term loosely) often earning a net deficit because as specified… most OF creators are not making much…
As you’ve put it… if you don’t have value to begin with chances are just being attractive isn’t enough considering there’s plenty of internet porn out there that you don’t have to pay for.
I agree. I didn’t mean to imply we were limited to differences between states.
“Sexual liberation” has done enormous damage to society (including billions of dollars in bastard taxes). Now politicians, including Trump, are thinking of the failed financial incentive for a subpar birthrate, without expressing or possibly even thinking of what caused it, one of which is the refusal of men to get married because of the serious dangers of the divorce regime.
"Trump has two appointments that carry immense consequences but receive zero attention in the media — including the alternative media and even from MAGA Republicans:
** Administration for Children and Famiies (ACF)*
** Office of Child Support Services (OCSS)*
Both are bastions of feminism and administer programs that are enormously destructive of families (as well as men, children, communities, America…). Both need real leadership, not hacks offering business as usual.
Both fall under the Department of Health and Human Service (HHS), so RFK, Jr. is ultimately in charge. But while he has a clear agenda and expertise on the “health” side, he has shown less interest or understanding of what happens in “human services”, which is the side that administers welfare and social work and that destroys families, fathers, children, low-income communities, black men, other men, and more by the millions. Who serves under him in these offices is critical."
10000… too much liberation = slavery. Simps and ho’s have destroyed relationships utterly. I don’t think people realize the extent of the damage
The illusion of choice
I used to be all for it because I had the belief a free sexual marketplace led to “plenty for all”
But in reality that Pareto principle is real, particularly regarding online dating. Everyone wants a Prince Charming but Prince Charming is often a dick. Prince Charming might fuck you for one night but if you aren’t exceptional just like Prince Charming what incentivizes Prince Charming to stay
I think online dating also did a lot of damage
Think tinder, bumble etc. a sea of cock to choose from 
Yes, as we have covered in the dating and sex threads. No politician has the balls to reverse this. Many people say the only way to correct this is through culture, but that can only be done through changing laws first or concurrently. Each aspect of “liberation” was brought forth because of a change in laws, such as obscenity, no-fault divorce, porn production, even the use of birth control by minor children (as young as thirteen years old).
But like, we’re not reversing this any time soon, probably not while we are alive. Only after major societal malfunction will it be fixed.
I had a “good” run on apps… triple digits…couple of short-term relationships…met some great girls…VERRRY few though…
I was busy with so many freaking dates on the dating websites, before apps, in the 2000s, until I met my wife on one.
POF, Tinder, Bumble, Hinge… I ran rampant … hence I was on that FB page a dozen times. Racked up a notch count but never anything serious… they have too many options
1 Like
@marine77 You sound like you need a good Amish woman.
@mnben87 You can split hairs about whether or not all of the gunshots really make us less safe or not, but you’re going to have a tough time convincing a lot of people in Maine that the radical policies of Democrats have improved local safety.
Liberal utopia… free fertilizer
Junkies are disgusting. They exist in a world of puke, blood, and shit. And they give zero fucks about how much of all 3 are on their needles or anything else.
One dude back in the day used to argue about harm reduction blah blah blah.
Wrong approach. Now time tested and proven.
1 Like
I would say so too. I’m a liberal guy in the sense that I don’t care what people do in their bedrooms, as long as everybody are willing.
But the OF and dating culture is probably quite damaging for many young individuals who jump in to the abyss.
Sure, you can make your decisions about your body as a 18y woman, but don’t tell me that fucking strangers while other strangers wank off to you is somehow liberating.
Junkies are sad. It’s not that they enjoy that life either. Everytime I travel somewhere where there is a ton of homeless people, my first thought is how the society has let it come to this.
3 Likes
He must’ve moved to Maine, because our politicians are still selling the same scam. Even Oregon walked back decriminalization.
When I use the term “greed of need” this is one of the reasons. Every person who moves here to destroy themselves in the street is a potential revenue stream for a bunch of nonprofits.
Here’s one of the worst examples. They operate downtown and the people running it have a pattern of dying. They are funded by State of Maine grants. They are responsible for supplying the needles that end up all around town.
3 Likes
In related local news, a University of New Hampshire poll found that leftist ideology is the most pressing issue among Maine voters.
I agree.
Other interesting findings are in this poll, including the clear priorities of Maine Democrats. “Opposing Trump” and advancing the LGBTQ agenda are their top priorities.
https://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1866&context=survey_center_polls
2 Likes
Relating to the poll, a Maine public school teacher has demonstrated why leftist ideology is correctly identified as such a major problem.
Teachers like this woman are common in Maine. The entire public education institution in Maine is oriented towards producing as many people who think like she does as possible.
Here’s her post and the predictable realization that her job is probably in jeopardy, even in Maine. She said the quiet part out loud, which you’re not supposed to do.
1 Like