Trump 2025 - Resuming The National Nightmare Of Peace And Prosperity (Part 1)

I have an adopted son and we’re best friends. He’s a plowman in the winter and a professional tuna fisherman in the summer.

He doesn’t act anything like you do. All you bring is negativity and discord, like most Socialists.

It is no coincidence that Maine reddit is full of anonymous zecarlos plotting to ruin me (they can’t) and my friends (who have vulnerabilities, and are having businesses attacked as Nazi and racist).

Only a few well known local nut jobs ever make posts like yours under their real name.

Take comfort in your Maine comrades shared hatred of me personally.

1 Like

I like this interaction. Its rational and stimulating. I don’t want to bring the level of discourse that we’re capable of down.

And- Sometimes, I’m a real dick. Im even aware of the fact that I’m a real dick, and highly capable of going low. I don’t necessarily like that about myself, but its a heavily engrained behavior and kinda like a guilty pleasure. I believe that eventually it will subside and I’ll become more refined at how & when and with whom I use it on.

In the mean time, don’t want to alienate the people who are good by using that type of stuff wrongly or unfairly.

1 Like

I’m on the same page there. I know that from time to time, when it behooves them, they do. It’s not a challenge I’d like to see any established rights withstand.

You know, I kinda missed the whole Hunter Thompson thing. At the time in my life when I would have been really into him, it turns out I was doing my best impression of him! :rofl:
Minus the journalism.

1 Like

Hunter Thompson was a great creative writer in the 1960s. He was struggling to explain the political world around him before he took his own life in the early 00’s. No great insights were to be found by me in those late writings of his. Just more of the same drug-fueled stuff from the 60’s and 70’s, along with lots of ramblings about sports.

I don’t think he would have kept it together to offer any meaningful insight into this much different world of 2025.

Back in the 1960’s society could support a muse like Thompson, who challenged notions of traditional journalism in an often-incoherent haze of intoxication, which was edgy and new at the time. His era was a time when the wild ideas of hippies, socialists, artists and intellectuals could shine brightly in the counter culture, having not yet been tested in American society. They could still pretend to have the answers that their square parents didn’t know about.

He had his own conception of the high water mark, which was waxing poetically about San Francisco, of the most beautiful cities in the world at the time, before all of Thompson’s friends gained political power and turned it into what it is today.

If I had to guess, he’d be on the side of the freaks and weirdos today, still yearning for his high water mark of getting high and pretending that the answers to society were found in an LSD tab and a rejection of your parent’s sensibilities. I suspect he’d have a hard time holding his friends accountable for what they’ve governed over.

Then again, maybe he’d have something to say about CBS news and his socialist buddies calling free speech “far right”. If anything would have flipped him, it would have been that, but nothing he’s ever written would be met with disapproval from today’s supporters of jailing political opponents for peaceful speech.

1 Like

I don’t care.

Are you the pot or the kettle?

This is why you aren’t too bright. I don’t hate you; I don’t even know you. The fact you would say that reveals how you think. I get it, I don’t share your love for Trump and that is a problem for you. So you make up this whole socialist thing you keep bringing up but fail to provide any pro socialist posts from me. You are a liar and the fact you have to lie on the internet for the reasons you do shows you are a very small man. A weak man. A snowflake. Hate you? I think you’re a sad sack of shit. I just mention you not having kids and you are quick to bring up your adopted son. You don’t think I know that already? You’ve mentioned him before. But you’re so obsessed with me you do what I knew you would do: you mention him yet again. I say you have no woman and you feel the need to tell me about some tranny hookers who are in your DMs because you think I actually care. I have no feelings for you one way or the other moron. You’re just a lying sack of shit on the internet who is half a stalker. Stop lying, and I’ll be civil to you. Keep lying, and we’ll have what we have: you acting like an obsessed stalker who is angry that I don’t want to have a threesome with you and Trump.

You know, you could always just state what your political beliefs are, who you voted for and why, as I have, and then there would be no speculation.

Have a good night, and I genuinely hope you can find some assistance for your condition.

See. I mention Thompson and you write an essay.

You know, you could stop lying thinking that you will coerce me into telling you anything.

See, this is weird. Why should anyone tell anyone who they voted for? If someone wants to reveal it of their own volition, that’s their business, but to demand they reveal it is some Stalinesque bullshit. Besides, no matter what I said, you wouldn’t believe it so what’s the point? However, had you been paying attention, you would already have known. And I can guarantee I’ve been far more consistent than you.

Like what? A protective order from the court, you weirdo?

The Germanys new law seems a bit silly, and impossible to pull out. I don’t think that’s the answer.

The reason why Germany is tightening the laws is the rising far right violence. There were similar discussions about islam when islamistic terrorism was rising. Currently the far right activists are usually the ones who are committing acts of violence.

The discussion is difficult to have, since we don’t have Europe as one governmental being like US is.

Still, if you look, you’ll find there are or have been many anti-immigration conservatives in governments in several countries (Italy, Finland,Poland,Holland etc.). Also in France and in Germany nationalist conservatives are on the rise. So there is not really any oppression going on.

. You can criticize immigration, trans rights and everything you listed in most parts of Europe. That is not hate speech. Hate speech is hoping or encouraging people directly to violence or whatever. I understand there are grey areas, and that’s where the main criticism of hate speech laws emerge. It still doesn’t mean there is Soviet Union going on in Germany.

I also find it a bit confusing that at the same time you’re saying that people talking AfD should be banned is conserning, if you look how Republicans and Democrats speak about each other.

I checked the legislative differences.The free speech is definitely more strongly protected in US.

There is no possibility to absolute free speech to be anywhere. There are limits even in US. Legislative measures define what is considered as a free speech in lawful sense, but there are moral and cultural restrictions which affect to legislation and beyond.

Free speech and hate speech has been a topic in European politics more than decade now, and the lines are drawn differently depending who’s in charge.

But saying that free speech here is under serious threat by some liberal socialists (or whoever), is wayyyy out of proportion. It might need some fine tuning or not (depending of who you ask), but I there are no EU member countries which are really slipping away from freedom or democracy currently (besides Hungary, that place is fucked).

PS. A ton of editing, since my last two messages were (maybe still are) a bit incoherent mess.

At least in Europe there are undemocratic and violent far right movements rising. It’s not any propaganda.

The History and Future of the Nordic Resistance Movement - Combating Terrorism Center at West Point

You seem quite intelligent and I admire your curiosity in verifying the information I have presented about Maine, so please allow me to point out the absurdity of the word “far right” both in Europe and especially in the US.

Italian fascism and National Socialism were emerging at the same approximate time, two completely different political movements sharing expansionist goals, natural military allies. “Right wing” at the time meant that you were for the social and political order of monarchists and the aristocratic class. Ideas that I hold about American government, property rights, individual rights and application of law were not even around in Europe in any significant numbers.

Soviet Communists had recently formed a new nation, and were in desperate need to cultivate a sense of “national socialism” in their new socialist nation. The Germans had already coined this term, so it became convenient to lump them in with fascists to rhetorically distinguish them from the REAL Socialists. The Germans rolled with it too in no small part, and thus came under the umbrella of Italian fascism, when it was really Italian fascism that eventually came under the umbrella of National Socialism when the Germans moved in during the war.

If fascism and National Socialism are functionally the same, why did Austrian fascists ban the National Socialist party years before the Anschluss?

Today, I am described as “far right” by socialists, in a clear attempt to suggest I share Hitler’s broad goals and vision for society.

American conservatism and National Socialism could not be more different, no matter how you would like to examine it. We share few characteristics with Italian fascism as well.

Nazis distinguished themselves from Marxists by substituting race for class in their conception of Socialism, otherwise it was remarkably similar, especially the rhetoric in the 1920’s and early 1930’s that propelled them to power. Hitler went to great lengths to explain why his use of dialectic materialism was superior to Marx’s, along with explaining his own hatred of capitalism.

Let’s go over some key characteristics that defined National Socialism that are completely absent from American conservative political thought.

Race-based public policy? Nazis yes, DSA yes, Republicans no
Distorted historical narratives to advance ideology? Nazis yes, DSA yes, Republicans no.
Rent controls? Nazis yes, DSA yes, Republicans no
Price controls? Nazis yes, DSA yes, Republicans no
Central economic planning? Nazis yes, DSA yes, Republicans no
Speech controls? Nazis yes, DSA big yes, Republicans no
Anti-capitalist? Nazis yes, DSA yes, Republicans no

Similarities between Republicans and Nazis include very, very little in fact. Nothing about that system of government is remotely compatible with American conservatism. Nothing about the DSA’s ideas are, either.

The most historically significant common denominator shared between National Socialism and American conservatism is our opposition to Marxist-Leninists. I personally despise that ideology with every bit of hatred I can muster for National Socialism. Those two inbred brothers and their retarded cousin fascism all belong in history’s trash bin.

Hitler used his distortion of history to convince a bunch of Germans that they were victims and promised to deliver “social justice” by applying the law unequally in Germany to “balance the scales” of history and deliver “social justice” for the favored victim group, Germans.

Democrats do the same thing today. Discriminating on the basis of race is a core belief of Democrats in 2025. Not doing that at all is a core belief of conservatives in 2025. We become “racist” for not discriminating, suggesting our lack of support for socialism is intended to prevent socialists from “balancing the scales”.

American conservatives believe in equality, not “social justice” or “equity”. Equality means every citizen gets treated the same under the law. “Equity” means that race and other characteristics is a factor in applying the law differently to different people, based on the person’s perceived race.

Back to Maine, if it is “far right” to oppose what’s been visited on this land in the last six year, than “far right” I am. I have raised my battle flag publicly, as have many others. I have a very, very solid understanding of American government, a good grasp on the legal system and a very comprehensive understanding of political rhetoric used in America.

I know what I am, and it is not a fascist, National Socialist, Marxist-Leninist, or a Democratic Socialist. I know what all of those things are, and American conservatives are as far away from all of the socialists as can be and nowhere close to fascists.

Thank goodness it is, as it is the ONLY reason we’re not on a path to needing the 2nd Amendment to get out of one-party Socialist rule. That IS the entire intent behind flooding nations with state-dependent migrants. Nobody campaigned on it in Maine or the USA. Democrats just topped enforcing immigration law, started trafficking people in, getting them on all benefits possible, calling everyone who objected racist and Nazis.

Hopefully, after understanding that the DSA is NOT a political party, you can at least acknowledge that I’m speaking of the situation in Maine objectively. I don’t distort what I write about here at all.

I do not see how that is, when Europeans are getting locked up for social media posts that harm no one. A man in the UK was arrested for standing and silently praying outside of an abortion clinic, speaking no words whatsoever.

Again, I would be getting the knock on my door for what I’ve said about the political situation in Maine, stating a clear opposition to public policies enforcing transgender vocabulary in public schools, mass illegal migration, empowering migrants to vote, and the shocking rise in crime we’ve experienced.

You cannot open the door to hate speech laws, or you’ve already lost the free speech battle. Today’s approved speech can now easily become tomorrow’s hate speech, depending on what works to the advantage of whoever is in control.

If you’d really like to learn more about American conservative political thought, I highly recommend reading virtually any Thomas Sowell book, or watching him speak on youtube. If we have had an ideological thought leader in the last 50 years, it has been Sowell.

Always a pleasure to disagree with a thoughtful person. I admire your curiosity and hope you will continue to grow in understanding. Today, right now, Socialists in Maine are attempting to destroy my friends daycare business, where all children are welcome and cared for. They are attempting to destroy another friends hairdressing business that she owns and operates. This is the woman who spoke up about school assault policies after her daughter was savagely beaten.

They are trying to destroy me too, having contacted my previous employer to inform them that I am a white supremacist. I am a contractor now, and my client likes me just fine, so they cannot threaten me.

I also happen to be able to whoop ass, and the local ones are aware that I am exceptionally strong, have trained martial arts and worked bar security, on account of my public facebook profile with a couple of pictures of this and a video of me doing some squat.

I’m here for any of those punks that want to punch people they call Nazis. I would take great delight in such a confrontation in the streets, but I doubt any of them will have the balls to confront me.

They will absolutely go after the weaker people who are vulnerable.

We are WAY out of the theoretical academic debate in Maine. My neighbors actually believe the “far right” narrative, and truly believe we are Nazis.

Thanks for the detailed answer. I don’t claim that term far right is not used loosely within politics (like every term is).

When I spoke far right, I referred to the violent groups who support political terrorism and violence, and whose aim is to end modern democracy. There are several in Europe currently.

I can see why that would be a problem, too. I stand with the AfD’s political goals of stopping mass migration. It has ravaged where I live, and I hold no ill will to any of the people who were cynically trafficked to my town in an attempt to subvert our system of government. Make no mistake about it, that was and remains the goal.

Trump’s election has stopped the flow of migrants, and now things are changing.

As far as I know AfD does not support ending democracy or support use of violence (I might be wrong here).

I actually did read their program. There were several things I didn’t like.

Also, I’m worried about the pro-Russian ties the party has.

I’m not a German thought, so they will
vote how they want.

I don’t know the details of that political situation either, but I know what mass migration does to a community of humans, and I know where speech restrictions lead to.

When I moved here Maine had levels of crime similar to Scandanavia, along with excellent public schools and a liberal, tolerant society where everyone was welcome. It’s fucking cold here, so few people besides whites ever bothered to come here until the government started offering comprehensive benefits to entice new troubled and needy people to move here and reliably vote for Socialist policies through Maine Democrats.

Our former local newspaper, now owned by out-of-state Socialist activists who actively advance Socialist narratives, has gone to great lengths to obscure facts from citizens in the last six years. The situation has grown so bad that the only local holdout still employed by them, a writer named Mark LaFlamme, has finally pressured them into covering the violence we’ve experienced lately.

It is shocking. There have been more shots fired in Lewiston in the last six years of DSA rule than ALL OF HISTORY COMBINED. And it isn’t even close. Here’s a screenshot of today’s headline.

The article also explores how the violence makes people “feel”, with no mention of actions taken by government to curtail it, because there have been none at all. Our local city council and the police chief who answers to them have plainly stated that “We are not going to arrest our way out of this problem.”

The violence has absolutely exploded under DSA rule, and everyone here knows it.

Here are the headlines we normally see in Maine. The same organization owns and runs the Portland Press Herald and the Lewiston Sun Journal.


There is nothing in the US close to Charlie Hebdo. So not only does France have free speech, they are not afraid to take advantage of it.

1 Like

There were just several drawings and art work published honoring Hebdo (it’s 10 years already!)

Wrong. They were unnatural allies. Fascism was not an Aryan based movement. If you knew the history of what we now call Germany (throw in Austria as well) and Italy, you would see the absurdity of that statement.

Ben provide Natura al nostro stato,
quando de l’Alpi schermo
pose fra noi et la tedesca rabbia

The UK is not Europe.