Trayvon Martin Trial

Off Topic
101

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

I’ve mentioned you maybe once since your last hissy fight that took up about a dozen pages. [/quote]

A fucking awesome fight, I know right? I really enjoyed burning your asshole. I blasted you and I guess, your ass is still stung that I fooled you over the fact I wasn’t a woman after all. Lol. What a fucking loser. Wipe those tears and forget about me, motherfucker. Let it go.

You mentioned me maybe once? Maybe? Maybe?? Not sure how many times, are we? Next time try to be fucking consistent with your statement, bitch. If you want to pull the, ‘‘Ninjaa turns EVERY single thread about himself’’ card, don’t get your panties twisted in your fishy discharged vagina when I state that you mention me at EVERY single opportunity.

[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I guess since we’re talking about a subject that definitely has the potential for some seriously backwards logic, race-baiting, inflammatory remarks based on ignorance and so forth, this was definitely an opportunity to mention you though.[/quote]

Lol says the cunt that made inflammatory and ignorant remarks toward blacks within the first pages of this thread. You knew exactly what you were doing, bitch .

You want to draw me into a race war? You will have to be smarter than that, you delusional fucktard. You’re a fucking idiot if you thought I’d come barging in here and give you the satisfaction to engage into race baiting. Stay with your fucking thread. This bitch got more important shit to deal with than debating over a subject that has been beaten to death.

As 460 said, yawn fucking yawn, motherfuckers.
[/quote]

No matter what you do, I win.

If you come in here and start ranting and raving like the self-absorbed lunatic you are then you’ve proven me right.

If you refuse to be baited and stay out of here, then I also win because it means the thread can continue onward without degenerating into whatever mess your presence will turn it into.

102

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

No matter what you do, I win.

If you come in here and start ranting and raving like the self-absorbed lunatic you are then you’ve proven me right.

If you refuse to be baited and stay out of here, then I also win because it means the thread can continue onward without degenerating into whatever mess your presence will turn it into.
[/quote]

When a man gets fucked over by another man, what else can he say but this ^^^? Boooobooo!

Lol @self absorbed. I ain’t the one who’ve been writing essays after essays about myself and my drug addictions over years in this place because I want to sound smart or relevant. Speak for yourself, bitch.

Proved your point? You wanted to race bait me – because that was after all, about race baiting, right? – and some of the black posters in this site. You’ve failed miserably, bitch.

Tada! I’m done with your loser ass.

Oh, yeah, you wiiiiiiiiiiin the internets!! If that can help your sore ego recover from being fooled by me, so be it, bitch. SO be it!!

103

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
Lol!! You say this:

[quote]csulli wrote:
You say this extremely often. Nearly every time I see anyone mention you…[/quote]

Then you go on and say this:

[quote]csulli wrote:
Nobody on this forum is “always bringing your name up”. Nobody. [/quote]

At least be consistent.

Your argument is therefore fucking irrelevant.

Ps: thank you for stating your opinion but I wasn’t addressing your ass. Now go take a fucking seat… or fight some wild dogs somewhere, lol.

Looks like you’ve packed on some muscles lately. You’ll need them for the fight.

[/quote]

What?

104

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
Lol!! You say this:

[quote]csulli wrote:
You say this extremely often. Nearly every time I see anyone mention you…[/quote]

Then you go on and say this:

[quote]csulli wrote:
Nobody on this forum is “always bringing your name up”. Nobody. [/quote]

At least be consistent.[/quote]

There is no inconsistency in the statements.

Should I explain why or do you want to try connecting the dots all by yourself? They’re very obvious and not too far apart.

105

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
Lol!! You say this:

[quote]csulli wrote:
You say this extremely often. Nearly every time I see anyone mention you…[/quote]

Then you go on and say this:

[quote]csulli wrote:
Nobody on this forum is “always bringing your name up”. Nobody. [/quote]

At least be consistent.

Your argument is therefore fucking irrelevant.

Ps: thank you for stating your opinion but I wasn’t addressing your ass. Now go take a fucking seat… or fight some wild dogs somewhere, lol.

Looks like you’ve packed on some muscles lately. You’ll need them for the fight.
[/quote]
HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION GENERATOR ACTIVATED:

Let’s say in the course of 3 months, I mention you twice, DB mentions you twice, Smashingweights once, super saiyan once, and Edgy mentions you once as well. For 6 out of 7 of these instances you accuse the person of “always bringing your name up” (Edgy was the one who got away scott free).

In this situation, no individual is bringing you up very often at all; no more often than anyone else, and probably less often than several people. And yet it can be said that you very often accuse whomever it is of “always bringing you up”.

Did that make sense? I’m not very good at explaining things sometimes.

Also thank you for the compliment :slight_smile:

I will return in kind.

I’ll have you know that on my hypothetical list of TNation dog fighting allies, you are very near to the top. Most importantly because you’re fucking crazy. But also because you know judo, which the dogs would likely not.

106

[quote]csulli wrote:

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
Lol!! You say this:

[quote]csulli wrote:
You say this extremely often. Nearly every time I see anyone mention you…[/quote]

Then you go on and say this:

[quote]csulli wrote:
Nobody on this forum is “always bringing your name up”. Nobody. [/quote]

At least be consistent.

Your argument is therefore fucking irrelevant.

Ps: thank you for stating your opinion but I wasn’t addressing your ass. Now go take a fucking seat… or fight some wild dogs somewhere, lol.

Looks like you’ve packed on some muscles lately. You’ll need them for the fight.
[/quote]
HYPOTHETICAL SITUATION GENERATOR ACTIVATED:

Let’s say in the course of 3 months, I mention you twice, DB mentions you twice, Smashingweights once, super saiyan once, and Edgy mentions you once as well. For 6 out of 7 of these instances you accuse the person of “always bringing your name up” (Edgy was the one who got away scott free).

In this situation, no individual is bringing you up very often at all; no more often than anyone else, and probably less often than several people. And yet it can be said that you very often accuse whomever it is of “always bringing you up”.

Did that make sense? I’m not very good at explaining things sometimes.

Also thank you for the compliment :slight_smile:

I will return in kind.

I’ll have you know that on my hypothetical list of TNation dog fighting allies, you are very near to the top. Most importantly because you’re fucking crazy. But also because you know judo, which the dogs would likely not.[/quote]

107

you think zimmerman is not guilty, you must be a racist.

you think zimmerman is guilty, you must be black and getting obama money.

seems like a black and white trial to me, pun intended.

108

[quote]csulli wrote:

Most importantly because you’re fucking crazy. [/quote]

In my experience, that beats everything else.

109

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Some punk couldn’t let his ego go and thought he was billy badass. [/quote]
That could also describe Zimmerman.

110

It’s interesting how Trayvon is being called a thug, a punk, someone who exercised bad judgement, without regard to the fact that he was 17. He was a kid. Zimmerman was the adult but the expectations of exercising good judgement are less for him? Less for an adult, with dreams of being a cop, and who was carrying a gun? The law may be on Zimmerman’s side when all is said and done but he still a coward, an idiot, and a piece of garbage. He wanted to play superhero and couldn’t even defend himself against a 17 year old without using a gun. It was a fight and he panicked like the coward he is and thought he was going to die. If anyone believes Trayvon was actually going to kill Zimmerman with his bare hands he is crazy. This wasn’t Mike Tyson at 17. If Zimmerman were a man he would have fought back without using a gun. I actually wonder how he was able to draw his weapon from his waist and then shoot while someone was on top of him raining down deadly blows.

111

Both of them were doing dumb shit

112

[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I know he isn’t a cop and doesn’t have the same latitude that a cop does, but police officers are ALWAYS on duty and are required to prevent crimes in progress whether or not they’re on shift or not. I tend to think that the same type of logic is applicable to Zimmerman here.[/quote]
You are wrong about cops. The Supreme Court already ruled on that.

113

[quote]spar4tee wrote:
Both of them were doing dumb shit[/quote]
IMO, the person with a gun needs to be held to the higher standard. An adult needs to be held to a higher standard. I have nothing against carrying for protection but one should still try and avoid situations in which he might have to use it. If it’s stupid to do something without a gun, carrying a gun doesn’t it make it any less stupid.

114

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]spar4tee wrote:
Both of them were doing dumb shit[/quote]
IMO, the person with a gun needs to be held to the higher standard. An adult needs to be held to a higher standard. I have nothing against carrying for protection but one should still try and avoid situations in which he might have to use it. If it’s stupid to do something without a gun, carrying a gun doesn’t it make it any less stupid. [/quote]
No appliance can negate the presence of stupidity but merely transform it

115

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]spar4tee wrote:
Both of them were doing dumb shit[/quote]
IMO, the person with a gun needs to be held to the higher standard. An adult needs to be held to a higher standard. I have nothing against carrying for protection but one should still try and avoid situations in which he might have to use it. If it’s stupid to do something without a gun, carrying a gun doesn’t it make it any less stupid. [/quote]

He was confronting someone who he thought was acting suspiciously in an area that had already had break ins. Can be heard on the 911 call saying he has his hand in his waistband, which is a indicates the possibility of someone packing. The bad decision Zimmerman made was leaving his vehicle but that was more for his own protection. If someone thinks you are doing something you shouldn’t be you can react a couple ways, reasonably and try to sort it out, or angrily and in Martins case apparently resort to violence.

Given the context of the situation that Zimmerman thought he was going in to, it seems perfectly reasonable to assume that he was already thinking this was a bad guy because of Martins behavior, so when the bad guy attacked and had the upper had (broken nose, bashing head in concrete) very few people would hesitate to use a weapon if they had it.

Martin should have not ran from or assaulted Zimmerman. I don’t understand why you run if you are not doing anything wrong, considering he was obviously willing to confront Zimmerman. There were just poor decisions made on both their parts but there was no crime committed.

116

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Some punk couldn’t let his ego go and thought he was billy badass. [/quote]
That could also describe Zimmerman. [/quote]

Yes, the dude without the shady past is certainly the punk, and the 17 year old that had a history of violence and drug activity is completely just a victim of circumstance, an eagle scout otherwise…

117

[quote]zecarlo wrote:
It’s interesting how Trayvon is being called a thug, a punk, someone who exercised bad judgement, without regard to the fact that he was 17. He was a kid.[/quote]

Okay?

He was a kid with a pattern of specific behavior in his life.

Was he dumb? Sure. That doesn’t give him the right to bounce someone’s head off the ground.

Who said that? Strawman much?

By all accounts nothing more could be said for MArtian.

This is foolish, beyond foolish.

Your trolling here right?

118

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

[quote]DBCooper wrote:

I’ve mentioned you maybe once since your last hissy fight that took up about a dozen pages. [/quote]

A fucking awesome fight, I know right? I really enjoyed burning your asshole. I blasted you and I guess, your ass is still stung that I fooled you over the fact I wasn’t a woman after all. Lol. What a fucking loser. Wipe those tears and forget about me, motherfucker. Let it go.

You mentioned me maybe once? Maybe? Maybe?? Not sure how many times, are we? Next time try to be fucking consistent with your statement, bitch. If you want to pull the, ‘‘Ninjaa turns EVERY single thread about himself’’ card, don’t get your panties twisted in your fishy discharged vagina when I state that you mention me at EVERY single opportunity.

[quote]DBCooper wrote:
I guess since we’re talking about a subject that definitely has the potential for some seriously backwards logic, race-baiting, inflammatory remarks based on ignorance and so forth, this was definitely an opportunity to mention you though.[/quote]

Lol says the cunt that made inflammatory and ignorant remarks toward blacks within the first pages of this thread. You knew exactly what you were doing, bitch .

You want to draw me into a race war? You will have to be smarter than that, you delusional fucktard. You’re a fucking idiot if you thought I’d come barging in here and give you the satisfaction to engage into race baiting. Stay with your fucking thread. This bitch got more important shit to deal with than debating over a subject that has been beaten to death.

As 460 said, yawn fucking yawn, motherfuckers.
[/quote]

you have a dirty, filthy mouth…

119

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Some punk couldn’t let his ego go and thought he was billy badass. [/quote]
That could also describe Zimmerman. [/quote]

Yes, the dude without the shady past is certainly the punk, and the 17 year old that had a history of violence and drug activity is completely just a victim of circumstance, an eagle scout otherwise…
[/quote]
Zimmerman’s past isn’t so clean either and he was an adult. At least Trayvon has the excuse of youth…something we all have used at one time or another in our lives.

120

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:

[quote]zecarlo wrote:

[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Some punk couldn’t let his ego go and thought he was billy badass. [/quote]
That could also describe Zimmerman. [/quote]

Yes, the dude without the shady past is certainly the punk, and the 17 year old that had a history of violence and drug activity is completely just a victim of circumstance, an eagle scout otherwise…
[/quote]
Zimmerman’s past isn’t so clean either and he was an adult. At least Trayvon has the excuse of youth…something we all have used at one time or another in our lives. [/quote]

Look, just to be clear, I think it is down right tragic that Martin lost his life. Nothing he was there to do (outside of outlandish speculation), whether it was go to a friend’s house or rob a house, justifies him losing his life. Nothing. There is no good that came out of this situation, none what-so-ever, and if I had to guess, I would guess he was there for an innocent reason.

That said, he started whooping another man’s ass, and it isn’t like he just held off Zimmerman and went about his day. He was bashing dude’s head off the ground. Just like he more likely than not, didn’t deserve to die, he, more likely than not, had no reason to bounce Zimmerman’s head off the ground.

Both parties were stupid, both parties lost here. However, the fact pattern and history of the two men point, as far as we know, to Martin going overboard in his reaction to being confronted, which ended his life. 17 is old enough to know that when you bash someone’s head off the pavement, nothing good is going to happen.