[quote]drunkpig wrote:
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
Would DN be so emotionally invested in this case if Trayvon were a Jew? Or even better - had the ethnicity of the involved parties been reversed?
[/quote]
Lol.
ADDRESS ME, instead of being a passive aggressive bitch.
[/quote]
It was a discussion question. Feel free to answer. Or not. I could give a shit. Bitch.
[/quote]
lol’d
.
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
It was a discussion question. Feel free to answer. Or not. I could give a shit. Bitch.
[/quote]
Sure, you did give a shit. You mentioned me to start some shit, bitch.
This thread is not about me.
Now fuck off.
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
lol. Just lol.
Does the mindset and behavior pattern of a typically “gangbanger” really need to be explained to anyone older than 7?..d the local choir boy. [/quote]
Don’t flatter yourself. That wasn’t the point I was trying to convey.
You’ve said this: ‘‘If Martin was repping a set, it shows a pattern of behavior typical of …while justifying Zimmerman confronting him in the first place.’’
What are the pattern of behaviour typical of people who do such things? What are they? Tell me. You said those patterns justified Zimmbitch in confronting Trayvon. What are those patterns you speak of? What behaviour are you referring to? Wearing a hood and walking a certain way proves you belong to a gang now? Does it mean that people, including whites, who dress that way are thugs?
Correct me if I’m wrong, but during his call to the dispatcher, that fat bastard never mentioned he thought Trayvon belonged to a gang. He saw a black young kid, with a hood on and followed him. Your statement above gives me the impression, Zimcunt knew Trayvon was a ‘‘gangbanger’’ beforehand, and, that the kid was doing something illegal prior being stalked and confronted by the fat bastard.
On the night in question Trayvon was NOT engaging in anything illegal. He was walking home. Zimmerman had no right pursuing him. Zimmerman instigated the entire confrontation and now Trayvon’s blood is on his hands.
Zimcunt racially profiled Trayvon. Period.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I have said more than once, Zimmerman getting out of the car was poor judgment. However, he, you and I have every right to speak to anyone on the street we wish for whatever reason we wish. [/quote]
Lol.
Way to divert from the original fact that Zimcunt got out of his car and stalked an unarmed kid.
Oh yeah, I get ya. We all have the right to talk to people we’ve been stalking blocks after blocks.
Creep.
[quote]darkninjaa wrote:
So Zimmerman was right to confront Trayvon, even though he was asked not to follow him and stay in his car? He was right to confront Trayvon because the kid has a hood on and, walked a certain way, which to some people, means ‘‘trouble’’, right? [/quote]
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I never said any of those things, but nice try. [/quote]
Thank you 
It’s called having a conversation and counter arguing. You insinuated, that Trayvon’s ‘‘demeanour’’, ‘‘pattern, behaviour etc…’’ justified Zimcunt confronting him. You talked about being a ‘‘gangbanger.’’ Therefore, based on your statement, wearing a hood and having a certain swag is the perfect reason to be confronted by some trigger happy bitch.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I don’t know. She has lied about enough, where there is more than enough reasonable doubt that she is full of shit now, and, if I was on the jury, I would largely be leaning towards her testimony helping create reasonable doubt for the defense. [/quote]
And as I said before, CB, what makes a believable witness is up to the jury.
[quote]countingbeans wrote
LOL. Not only does this statement contradict itself, it isn’t even true. Her initial statement to police had people saying different things than he trail testimony, and I don’t believe she could hear grass in the initial statement, whatever that sounds like. [/quote]
LOL.
The same could be said about Zimmercunt statement.
That cunt has lied at every step. He was ‘‘afraid’’ but stated he was following Trayvon --even though the dispatcher told him not to? He had a gun but was screaming for help? His head was bashed against concrete. EMT said he was complaining of injuries to his head after being continuously ‘‘bashed’’ into the pavement. Yet witnesses saw Zimmerman standing over Trayvon with no fucking dizziness.
He had no contusion, concussion, brain damage not feared. He was aware enough to speak to police for hours. Damn! Fuck! What a great guy!! Shall we call him Mr Glass?
[quote]countingbeans wrote
Correct. A proven liar, who calls white people “crackers” has stated as such. Pardon me while I am suspect of her statements. [/quote]
Crackers: name of some kind of biscuit.
Crackers, according to the Merriam dictionary: usually disparaging: a poor, usually Southern white; capitalized: a native or resident of Florida or Georgia – used as a nickname.
Meh, I guess the C word has been used by blacks to: tie a white person up and whip them blood dry; make them feel inferior to blacks; deny a white person a seat at a lunch counter; systematically deny whites the right to vote; Deny a white person a seat near the front of a bus; crack the skulls of peaceful white protesters marching for equality; burn white families alive while dressed in white robes and pointy hats; blow up a church and kill four little white girls. Lynch whites for centuries…
Do I need to go on?.. but yeah, some blacks use that word to insult a whites. But does it bear the grievous, historical freight of the N word? Not even fucking close.
But, hey, if Rachel using that word, makes her the ultimate ‘‘racist’’ and, since she is Trayvon’s friend, then coolio! By all means, you and the jury must discount her testimony.
[quote]countingbeans wrote
Correct. Cook’s account of the situation sure does help out Zimmerman as well. [/quote]
Yeap. And, let’s not forget Selma Mora’s who witnessed Zimmerman on top of Trayvon! You could see that fat bastard was about to piss his pants behind that desk as she testifies against him :)[/quote]
This reminds me of that Southpark episode where Chef is so obsessed with fighting racism that he ends up being the most racist one…
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
It was a discussion question. Feel free to answer. Or not. I could give a shit. Bitch.
[/quote]
Sure, you did give a shit. You mentioned me to start some shit, bitch.
This thread is not about me.
Now fuck off.[/quote]
You are doing a good job convincing us otherwise. But what do I know, I made fun of one fat moron which aparantly means I hate all black people. Carry on.
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
Don’t flatter yourself. That wasn’t the point I was trying to convey.
You’ve said this: ‘‘If Martin was repping a set, it shows a pattern of behavior typical of …while justifying Zimmerman confronting him in the first place.’’
What are the pattern of behaviour typical of people who do such things? [/quote]
People involved in gangs are much more likely to react in a violent way to confrontation or anything seen as “disrespect”. I’ve seen a Hispanic man get the ever living shit kicked out of him for walking down the wrong path at a club. He didn’t know that area of the floor wasn’t public space.
People in gangs typically have a healthy distrust and disregard for any source of real or perceived authority that comes from outside their gang structure.
People in gangs tend to dress in certain patterns, ways that draw attention to the set they rep. See Hell’s Angles wearing their colors for example.
I did say that, but you seem to misunderstand my intended point. Again, for the 100th time, Zimmerman used poor judgment leaving his vehicle under the circumstances. However, with the help of hindsight, if Martin had ended up being Tony Soprano, it would, in hindsight, justified his leaving the vehicle.
Martin appears to have been a fairly normal kid, who for all purposes was not in violation of any laws and was not intending to. So in hindsight, Zimmerman has very little justification for leaving his car. You know, other than the fact Martin matched the description of B&E suspects in the neighborhood.
No, and I’d wish you would stop trying to put words in my mouth I didn’t speak. Stop reading things I didn’t say because they don’t fit your narrative.
That said, if you draw attention to yourself by the manor you dress and walk, then you draw attention to yourself. Skin color is irrelevant. If you dress, talk and walk around my house like Young Jeezy, expect me to assume you want to be viewed as living the “thug life”. If you dress in your colors, have your bandana on and speak like Sons of Anarchy expect me to assume you want to be viewed like a biker.
Much like people with rims, neos and subs in their car wondering why they get pulled over more than dude in the civic… You draw the attention to yourself you request.
I didn’t know you had to be in a gang or be a gang banger to commit a B&E. That is going to be news to quite a few people. Although some gangs are famous for their home invasions, I don’t believe it is a requirement to be suspect or to break into a house…
It seems as though this is the case, yes.
False. You, him or I can follow anyone we like in public.
Did he? Did he speak to Martian first? Did Zimmerman make physical contact first?
I’m glad you have your mind made up, I really am. Too bad reality very may well be completely different.
[quote]Way to divert from the original fact that Zimcunt got out of his car and stalked an unarmed kid.
Oh yeah, I get ya. We all have the right to talk to people we’ve been stalking blocks after blocks.
Creep.
;)[/quote]
Stalked for blocks? Is that what happened? Stalked? Interesting choice of words, but irrelevant, you, him and I are free to follow someone, yes. And you are free to speak to that person as well, yes.
[quote]darkninjaa wrote:
You insinuated, that Trayvon’s ‘‘demeanour’’, ‘‘pattern, behaviour etc…’’ justified Zimmerman confronting him. You talked about being a ‘‘gangbanger.’’ Therefore, based on your statement, wearing a hood and having a certain swag is the perfect reason to be confronted by some trigger happy bitch. [/quote]
I did none of this. You are making up arguments that never were made.
[quote]LOL.
The same could be said about Zimmerman statement.
Zimmerman has lied at every step.[/quote]
Based on what? Your opinion? Her lies are proven on tape, though testimony. What way can you prove Zimmerman lied that isn’t conjecture and circumstantial interpretation at best?
At what point of “dizziness” is it visible to people yards away? At any level before that, is it not dizziness? How long does dizziness from rear cranial blows last?
And? How is this relevant? Should a person not fear for their life until their injuries are at a certain level of sever. BAck to my example you’ve ignored twice: Should my wife have to wait until her rapist has penetrated her 3 time or finishes before she can defend herself? Can she defend herself when he rips her panties?
[quote]
Crackers: name of some kind of biscuit.
Crackers, according to the Merriam dictionary: usually disparaging: a poor, usually Southern white; capitalized: a native or resident of Florida or Georgia – used as a nickname.[/quote]
Lol. I used to think you were a reasonable person. But you are going to try and defend the use of a pejorative racial slur…
Wow.
[quote]
Meh, I guess the C word has been used by blacks to: tie a white person up and whip them blood dry; make them feel inferior to blacks; deny a white person a seat at a lunch counter; systematically deny whites the right to vote; Deny a white person a seat near the front of a bus; crack the skulls of peaceful white protesters marching for equality; burn white families alive while dressed in white robes and pointy hats; blow up a church and kill four little white girls. Lynch whites for centuries…
Do I need to go on?.. but yeah, some blacks use that word to insult a whites. But does it bear the grievous, historical freight of the N word? Not even fucking close.[/quote]
What the hell does the “N word” have anything to do with anything? I didn’t say it, I didn’t use it, best of my knowledge neither did Zimmerman.
How is any of this rambling relevant to anything? How on Earth is the horrid mistreatment of blacks in America decades before this trail relevant at all to this trial?
If it discounts testimony in the OJ case that one of the cops was a racist pig, it stands to reason that MArtin’s use of racial slurs points to him also being a racist… Not sure how this logic escapes anyone…
I’m glad this is a game to you. I’m sure you are enjoying this.
But, that is what we call the foundation of reasonable doubt. And I’m sure no one needs a lesson on the foundation of the American legal system and how the concept of reasonable doubt works…
[quote]no_name_narrator wrote:
This reminds me of that Southpark episode where Chef is so obsessed with fighting racism that he ends up being the most racist one…[/quote]
Awww, let me cry a fucking river. I’m not the one feeling o soooo superior to whites. Bitch, please.
Did your just-joined ass jump in this thread to purposely post this shit? Have you got anything substantial to say about the trial? Nope. I thought so.
Where were you when white posters were making racially offensive posts? You didn’t feel like calling them out 'cos you enjoyed the spectacle, right?
I know, I know, I make most of you uncomfortable. The only defence mechanism you’ve got is to call me racist. BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
It was a discussion question. Feel free to answer. Or not. I could give a shit. Bitch.
[/quote]
Sure, you did give a shit. You mentioned me to start some shit, bitch.
This thread is not about me.
Now fuck off.[/quote]
I mentioned your name because you are a racist, and need to be called out for precisely that. I think my post served its purpose. But it was a discussion question, and partially rhetorical given you answer it with just about every post.
[quote]Waittz wrote:
You are doing a good job convincing us otherwise. [/quote]
I’m having a conversation with CB and you think this thread is about me? Are we talking about DN or are we discussing about Trayvon Martin’s trial?
Maybe I should say this thread is about you too, since you’ve posted several times, and sometimes, on issues that had nothing to do with the subject at hand.
Or, is this thread about CB? 460?
But, hey, let’s single me out if that makes you feel so gooood!
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
[quote]no_name_narrator wrote:
This reminds me of that Southpark episode where Chef is so obsessed with fighting racism that he ends up being the most racist one…[/quote]
Awww, let me cry a fucking river. I’m not the one feeling o soooo superior to whites. Bitch, please.
Did your just-joined ass jumped in this thread to purposely post this shit? Have you got anything substantial to say about the trial? Nope. I thought so.
Where were you when white posters were making racially offensive posts? You didn’t feel like calling them out 'cos you enjoyed the spectacle, right?
I know, I know, I make most of you uncomfortable. The only defence mechanism you’ve got is to call me racist. BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!!!
[/quote]
The point is that you are bridging the known facts with your own personal conclusions. There’s no way to know if this was racial profiling. It’s just as likely that it was poor judgement combined with a hero complex. But it’s people like you who immediately assume the worst that really exacerbate the problem you claim to be fighting against. You’re so anti-racist, you’re just racist yourself haha.
[quote]drunkpig wrote:
I mentioned your name because you are a racist, and need to be called out for precisely that. I think my post served its purpose. But it was a discussion question, and partially rhetorical given you answer it with just about every post. [/quote]
Awwww. Boo boo boooo.
Did you call out other white posters in this thread, racists? Nope. You were enjoying their denigrating posts, weren’t you?
But here you are jumping at me, bitch. LOL! Lovin’ it!!
FYI, I don’t consider myself superior to whites. I don’t see them as beneath me. I’d be a racist if I did so.
Time to pick up a dictionary, bitch, and learn the meaning of the word!!!
Bitch.
[quote]Big Kahuna wrote:
[quote]Gambit_Lost wrote:
I don’t know Schwarz-ie, Zimmerman had been training MMA 3x/week …
lol[/quote]
I hear he beat Anderson Silva in an underground bareknuckle match. Or maybe he got tackled and then promptly shot Silva in the head, I forget.[/quote]
Remarkable resilience, coming back from that bullet to the face…can’t believe Silva regenerated fast enough to take Sonnen on…must be why Sonnen had the upper hand for some of the fight. I hear bullets rattle your brain pretty good.
Anyone else losing faith in the Prosecutor’s compitence in selecting witnesses? Or was that completely lost with the ‘friend’. It is like they aren’t even interviewing them before they go on stand.
[quote]thethirdruffian wrote:
[quote]Smashingweights wrote:
[quote]SickSex6 wrote:
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Wait…Rockninja is black?
Well now that makes more sense.
[/quote]
Lol. Youre still on this? 4 months of thinking about me and some conspriracy?
Damn man. I feel terrible for anyone you know. I bet you harp on meaningless shit forever
[/quote]
Ummmm so which half of Ct Rockninja’s other account is this?[/quote]
Really. Who has the kind of time that takes to have at least three acounts?[/quote]
Headhunter?
is there a way to have the font be in cursive so trollninja can no longer be involved in the thread?
[quote]SickSex6 wrote:
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Wait…Rockninja is black?
Well now that makes more sense.
[/quote]
Lol. Youre still on this? 4 months of thinking about me and some conspriracy?
Damn man. I feel terrible for anyone you know. I bet you harp on meaningless shit forever
[/quote]
Wait SixSex6VampireNinja is black too?
Who would have thunk.
Shit this is just one crazy ass day.
[quote]no_name_narrator wrote:
The point is that you are bridging the known facts with your own personal conclusions. There’s no way to know if this was racial profiling. It’s just as likely that it was poor judgement combined with a hero complex. But it’s people like you who immediately assume the worst that really exacerbate the problem you claim to be fighting against. You’re so anti-racist, you’re just racist yourself haha.[/quote]
Hahahahahaha!
Anti racist? Proud of it! Racist? That’s what some white people call me when they can’t stand me talking about how superior some of them think they are to other ethnicities. I guess, it stings, uh? I don’t see myself as superior than whites. So you fail, hahaha!!!
I love how some of you defending Zimmercunt racially profiling Trayvon.
But I won’t bother about this. There’re been two threads about that already.
Toodles.
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]SickSex6 wrote:
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Wait…Rockninja is black?
Well now that makes more sense.
[/quote]
Lol. Youre still on this? 4 months of thinking about me and some conspriracy?
Damn man. I feel terrible for anyone you know. I bet you harp on meaningless shit forever
[/quote]
Wait SixSex6VampireNinja is black too?
Who would have thunk.
Shit this is just one crazy ass day.[/quote]
The hell is wrong with you? Lol
Please tell me youre messing with me to get a rise or something. I really hope thats the case.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
People …tterns, ways that draw attention to the set they rep. See Hell’s Angles wearing their colors for example. [/quote]
Coolio.
So you said… ‘‘If Martin was repping a set, it shows a pattern of behavior typical of people who do such things, and strongly backs up Zimmerman’s account of the situation, strongly suggests Martin’s intent was to kill Zimmerman, and clears Zimmerman’s use of deadly force, all while justifying Zimmerman confronting him in the first place.’’
‘‘clears, Zimms’s use of deadly force, all while justifying Zimmerman confronting in the first place’’?? But Zimmerman didn’t know Trayvon was ‘‘gangbanger’’!
Or did he? Is that why he follwed Trayvon? Who follows a gangsta around? Zimcunt said he was scared. Yet, he followed a gangbanger. He was armed, with a gun, willing to cause harm if the opportunity presented itself. He knew exactly what the fuck he was about to do.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I did say that, but you seem to misunderstand my intended point. Again, for the 100th time, Zimmerman used poor judgment leaving his vehicle under the circumstances. However, with the help of hindsight, if Martin had ended up being Tony Soprano, it would, in hindsight, justified his leaving the vehicle.
Martin appears to have been a fairly normal kid, who for all purposes was not in violation of any laws and was not intending to. So in hindsight, Zimmerman has very little justification for leaving his car. You know, other than the fact Martin matched the description of B&E suspects in the neighborhood. [/quote]
Come on, CB… you said this…‘‘If Martin was repping a set, it shows a pattern of behavior typical of people who do such things, and strongly backs up Zimmerman’s account of the situation, strongly suggests Martin’s intent was to kill Zimmerman, and clears Zimmerman’s use of deadly force, all while justifying Zimmerman confronting him in the first place.’’
‘‘Justtifying Zimmerman confronting him in the first place’’. According to this earlier statement of yours, and based on the description of patterns you gave above, Zimmcunt saw a ‘‘gangbanger’’, so he was justified in confronting him. No?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
No, and I’d wish you would stop trying to put words in my mouth I didn’t speak. Stop reading things I didn’t say because they don’t fit your narrative.
That said, if you draw attention to yourself by the manor you dress and walk, then you draw attention to yourself. Skin color is irrelevant. If you dress, talk and walk around my house like Young Jeezy, expect me to assume you want to be viewed as living the “thug life”. If you dress in your colors, have your bandana on and speak like Sons of Anarchy expect me to assume you want to be viewed like a biker.
Much like people with rims, neos and subs in their car wondering why they get pulled over more than dude in the civic… You draw the attention to yourself you request. [/quote]
But…but… I thought, dressing in a certain way, with certain colours etc = thug/gangbanger. Ain’t it what you insinuated the first time by saying Zimcunt was justified in confronting Trayvon due to a set of behaviour, patterns etc… that the kid may have displayed? NO?
Am I putting words in your mouth again?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I didn’t know you had to be in a gang or be a gang banger to commit a B&E. That is going to be news to quite a few people. Although some gangs are famous for their home invasions, I don’t believe it is a requirement to be suspect or to break into a house… [/quote]
Oh… so Trayvon was committing a B&E when Fat Bastard was on the phone with the dispatcher…
Or, Zimcunt assumed Trayvon was a gangbanger who was about to commit a B&E since he was wearing a hood, probably jeans down his ass and… was black. Typical Gangbanger I guess.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Did he? Did he speak to Martian first? Did Zimmerman make physical contact first? [/quote]
According to Zimmercunt, of course not!
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Stalked for blocks? Is that what happened? Stalked? Interesting choice of words, but irrelevant, you, him and I are free to follow someone, yes. And you are free to speak to that person as well, yes. [/quote]
I don’t follow people. I’m not a fucking creep.
[quote]darkninjaa wrote:
You insinuated, that Trayvon’s ‘‘demeanour’’, ‘‘pattern, behaviour etc…’’ justified Zimmerman confronting him. You talked about being a ‘‘gangbanger.’’ Therefore, based on your statement, wearing a hood and having a certain swag is the perfect reason to be confronted by some trigger happy bitch. [/quote]
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I did none of this. You are making up arguments that never were made. [/quote]
Then, what did you mean by this, (yes I bring this up again): ‘‘If Martin was repping a set, it shows a pattern of behavior typical of people who do such things, and strongly backs up Zimmerman’s account of the situation, strongly suggests Martin’s intent was to kill Zimmerman, and clears Zimmerman’s use of deadly force, all while justifying Zimmerman confronting him in the first place.’’
This how I read this : If Martin showed the behaviour, patterns of a gangbanger, (most gangbangers love to wear hoods, jeans down their asses etc…) then Zimcunt was justified in confronting him in the first place. If Martin was a gangbanger, then this strongly backs up Zim’s account, which states that he was beaten to a pulp by Martin, who was a violent, bloodthirsty thug willing to kill Zimbitch.‘’
You’re telling me that’s not what you meant? Am I putting words in your mouth?
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
Based on what? Your opinion? Her lies are proven on tape, though testimony. What way can you prove Zimmerman lied that isn’t conjecture and circumstantial interpretation at best? [/quote]
Oh… just as Zims’ lies are proven on statements that had been changed several times!!!
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
At what point of “dizziness” is it visible to people yards away? At any level before that, is it not dizziness? How long does dizziness from rear cranial blows last? [/quote]
Err yeah, someone who’s got his skull repeatedly bashed on the concrete, didn’t actually pass out right then, and was proudly standing over his victim like Superman over Zod.
Dizziness my ass.
Skull bashing, my fucking ass.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
And? How is this relevant? [/quote]
Fucking relevant. He LIED.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
What the hell does the “N word” have anything to do with anything? I didn’t say it, I didn’t use it, best of my knowledge neither did Zimmerman.
How is any of this rambling relevant to anything? How on Earth is the horrid mistreatment of blacks in America decades before this trail relevant at all to this trial? [/quote]
What does the C word have to do with Rachel Jeantel’s testimony about her convo with Trayvon that night? You’re the one who brought it up.
Does Rachel using the C word should cause the jury to discount her testimony? Does her using the C word make her racist, or prejudiced?
Once again, you brought it up. Do not compare the use of C word to N word. It is not the same thing. The C word lacks the grievous freight of of the N word. That was the point of my post. DEAL WITH IT.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
If it discounts testimony in the OJ case that one of the cops was a racist pig, it stands to reason that MArtin’s use of racial slurs points to him also being a racist… Not sure how this logic escapes anyone… [/quote]
Please brush on your knowledge of what a racist is and, what a bigot/prejucided person is.
As far as I’m concerned, I was not aware, Trayvon and his gang were considering themselves superior to whites, nor distributing epithets about black supremacy.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
I’m glad this is a game to you. I’m sure you are enjoying this. [/quote]
Oh, please, stop putting words in my mouth! I didn’t say that!!!
[quote]SickSex6 wrote:
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
[quote]SickSex6 wrote:
[quote]UtahLama wrote:
Wait…Rockninja is black?
Well now that makes more sense.
[/quote]
Lol. Youre still on this? 4 months of thinking about me and some conspriracy?
Damn man. I feel terrible for anyone you know. I bet you harp on meaningless shit forever
[/quote]
Wait SixSex6VampireNinja is black too?
Who would have thunk.
Shit this is just one crazy ass day.[/quote]
The hell is wrong with you? Lol
Please tell me youre messing with me to get a rise or something. I really hope thats the case.[/quote]
Nah, just a wild day RockN…just a wild ass day.