My God she’s stupid, she had to pause long and hard when asked if she fully understands english.
At least she had an excuse to got harr ‘court nails’ done…
[quote]RampantBadger wrote:
My God she’s stupid, she had to pause long and hard when asked if she fully understands english.
At least she had an excuse to got harr ‘court nails’ done…
I just read this comment, “She needs to mix some slim fast with that booze.” HAHAHAAHAHA
[quote]RampantBadger wrote:
… she had an excuse to got her ‘court nails’ done…
YOU CAN NOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP.
There is a reason for someone like her to be this way. I have simply tried to point out there shouldn’t be people falling between the cracks like this in 21st Century America with standards that were set by our forefathers.
OUR FATHERS FOUGHT TO GIVE THESE SOULS FREEDOM. TO ACCOMPLISH WONDERS AND ENJOY THEIR LIVES UNDER FREEDOM. Why do they despise those that fought to set them free?
Who watching this besides me thinks to themselves that black slaves were better educated and had much stronger morals and character than many FREE CITIZENS in Chicago, Oakland, Washington DC, Baltimore, Philadelphia, New Orleans,Detroit etc…
SLAVES in a NEW WORLD with language they had never heard had a better understanding of what was important than what 21st century liberal Democrats have led our young citizens to hold as important.
FREE Obama PHONES don’t take the place of your elementary and high school and ongoing life’s education.
This young woman (and millions more like her) clearly need help if their idea of what is IMPORTANT in a trial for a man’s life is preparing COURT NAILS. Liberalism is gutting our nation from the inside.
Obama phone, disability, food stamps, free housing… the reason you don’t need public education, because what more could you ask for:
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
Why do they despise those that fought to set them free?
[/quote]
There is a psychological theory that correlates dedication to a cause based on how much a person has put into it. The more you put in the higher your level of dedication becomes to make it work, or believe that it works. That is one of the reason people become inextricable from cults. They have given their material goods, sweat equity, and lives to a given cause- therefore it Must work (to them). Same with freedom and the American dream.
Now turn that around. How vested is someone who has given absolutely nothing?
They will give about as much of a crap as I do about whether or not the Pirates win the World Series ever again (which is not at all).
[quote]therajraj wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]therajraj wrote:
refers to the black community going “ape shit”
ape shit
black people
DB is in subtle troll mode[/quote]
“Going ape shit” is a common phrase to describe people’s actions. I would imagine their is no racial undertones to that statement.
It isn’t a dog whistle, but why to play the PC race card…[/quote]
I’m familiar with the term and I’m also familiar with DB’s posts.
He’s a writer, knows his way around the English language and chooses words for certain effect.
I find it quite surprising that someone who gets paid to write for a living, would make such an obvious misstep…
He’s not racist, but he’s bent on trolling this thread.
[/quote]
The fact that you read into it says more about you than DB.
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
Why do they despise those that fought to set them free?
[/quote]
There is a psychological theory that correlates dedication to a cause based on how much a person has put into it. The more you put in the higher your level of dedication becomes to make it work, or believe that it works. That is one of the reason people become inextricable from cults. They have given their material goods, sweat equity, and lives to a given cause- therefore it Must work (to them). Same with freedom and the American dream.
Now turn that around. How vested is someone who has given absolutely nothing?
They will give about as much of a crap as I do about whether or not the Pirates win the World Series ever again (which is not at all).
[/quote]
That’s a very good point.
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
[quote]angry chicken wrote:
Beans, I’m PRETTY SURE in this thread the sentiment that "he’s was acting like a thug or billy bad ass [/quote]
Yes, without question this has been speculated as the case.
I for one, have repeatedly said this was not the case. Unless he was there to rape or murder someone, which is so beyond unlikely it is laughable to even mention, he did not deserve to lose his life.
[quote]
I’ve actually been in plenty of situations over the years where I’ve had to fight a stranger unexpectedly. To answer your question, I would do exactly what I’ve done in the past: I would beat them until I believed they were no longer a threat. I would inflict the maximum amount of damage in the least amount of time. If they continued to move or try to get up, I would continue to beat them. Until they were unconscious, incapacitated (broken femur or kneecap, crushed trachea or blinded), or stopped moving (curled up in a fetal position just trying to defend themselves and not attacking). I would not beat them with the intention of killing them (not without good reason), nor would I climb on top of them raining down blows (bad strategy to go to the ground in a street fight) but I would definitely beat them into complete submission.
That sounds brutal, I know. But that’s exactly what a police officer will do to you if they feel threatened. And it’s really the only way to respond to and stop a threat and ensure your safety. Being attacked alone at night in unfamiliar territory puts you on deadly ground. If you contemplate the full ramifications of that scenario, it’s the only logical conclusion. So you have to respond accordingly - On deadly ground, you do battle… It’s brutal, but it’s reality. Those who’ve actually had the unfortunate occasion to fight for their life and lived to tell about it will agree with me.[/quote]
So this kind of justifies Zimmerman’s use of deadly force then, no? [/quote]
Twist it all you want, Beans. I believe I specifically said I would NOT beat anyone with the intention of killing them, much less shoot them in a fist fight, but whatever - nice strawman. Zimmerman got out of his fucking car and pursued Martin. Anything after that is on him. He SAYS Martin attacked him, but we’ll never know because he shot him dead. If he had stayed in his car (or even better, his house) and minded his own business instead of trying to act like a fucking police, Martin would be alive.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I don’t care about the trial. I have absolutely NO faith in the “justice” system whatsoever. But Zimmerman will pay for his stupidity. He’ll either be convicted and get shanked in prison or he’ll be acquitted and look over his shoulder until someone shoots his pathetic ass. I personally hope it’s the latter, as it would be the most fitting.
Seriously, what kind of a pathetic pussy shoots someone in a fist fight?[/quote]
I’m guessing someone having their head bounced off the concrete.
bunch of creepy ass white people in this thread.
wait, i cant read what i just wrote but my hair is did
[quote]Aggv wrote:
bunch of creepy ass white people in this thread.
wait, i cant read what i just wrote but my hair is did[/quote]
iz creepy ass cracka … ser
[quote]SickSex6 wrote:
After seeing the type of ghetto ass girl he would involve himself with i cant help but believe he was the same way…
I wouldnt doubt Martin attacked first
This Rachel bitch just ruined the whole thing for the Martins
[/quote]
Are you serious with that shit, brotha?
English is not even her first language, come the fuck on!
She wasn’t born in Hollywood hills. She’s from the hood, where people are not given access to healthy food, education, other resources. How did you really expect her to behave? Like a scholar? Blame the prosecution for not preping her properly beforehand, but do not blame her for ‘‘fucking it’’ up. Actually, it was fucking awesome she was herself instead of reciting a script.
It’s incredible that so many people are forgetting about the MAIN reason why Rachel was even on the stand. Fuck how she spoke and how nervous she was. A young unarmed man was killed by a fucking armed racist pig who specifically sought to cause harm. But no, let’s not focus on that, let’s focus on her look, her speech, her attitude on the stand.
This is yet another diversion by the media and the defence to put her character on the line as opposed to questioning the character of the person who took Trayvon’s life.
You need to stay focused, man. Stay focused.
Rachel never wavered in her testimony and her account coincides with the cumulative narrative that the other witnesses have testified to. No, she didn’t fuck it up for the Martins.
She held it together and didn’t let the defence trip her up, no matter how much that fucker tried.
The way the social media is tearing her apart, is exactly the reason why some people are unwilling to testify.
Fucking hell.
[quote]SkyzykS wrote:
[quote]conservativedog wrote:
Why do they despise those that fought to set them free?
[/quote]
There is a psychological theory that correlates dedication to a cause based on how much a person has put into it. The more you put in the higher your level of dedication becomes to make it work, or believe that it works. That is one of the reason people become inextricable from cults. They have given their material goods, sweat equity, and lives to a given cause- therefore it Must work (to them). Same with freedom and the American dream.
Now turn that around. How vested is someone who has given absolutely nothing?
They will give about as much of a crap as I do about whether or not the Pirates win the World Series ever again (which is not at all).
[/quote]
Sky’zz that is one hell of an astute observation. Brilliant
[quote]RampantBadger wrote:
My God she’s stupid, she had to pause long and hard when asked if she fully understands english.
At least she had an excuse to got harr ‘court nails’ done…
Yeah… she’s doing what most late teen girls do on social media. Talkin’ about their hair, nails, drink, sex etc… I wasn’t aware that was a crime.
But as always, the media is quick to smear her, but never mentions the other tweets about her friendship to Trayvon.
[quote]stefan128 wrote:
For example the Paula Dean things as you stated. So she says it and there is no forgiveness, she is absolutely losing her cooking “empire”. [/quote]
Are you aware that Paula Dean is not losing her empire for saying the N word some twenty years ago? It’s has nothing to do with her saying the N word 20 years ago.
And FYI, it was a WHITE woman who reported her – On events that happened RECENTLY. Not 20 years ago.
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
A young unarmed man was killed by a fucking armed racist pig
[/quote]
How do you know he’s a racist?
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
[quote]SickSex6 wrote:
After seeing the type of ghetto ass girl he would involve himself with i cant help but believe he was the same way…
I wouldnt doubt Martin attacked first
This Rachel bitch just ruined the whole thing for the Martins
[/quote]
Are you serious with that shit, brotha?
English is not even her first language, come the fuck on!
She wasn’t born in Hollywood hills. She’s from the hood, where people are not given access to healthy food, education, other resources. How did you really expect her to behave? Like a scholar? Blame the prosecution for not preping her properly beforehand, but do not blame her for ‘‘fucking it’’ up. Actually, it was fucking awesome she was herself instead of reciting a script.
It’s incredible that so many people are forgetting about the MAIN reason why Rachel was even on the stand. Fuck how she spoke and how nervous she was. A young unarmed man was killed by a fucking armed racist pig who specifically sought to cause harm. But no, let’s not focus on that, let’s focus on her look, her speech, her attitude on the stand.
This is yet another diversion by the media and the defence to put her character on the line as opposed to questioning the character of the person who took Trayvon’s life.
You need to stay focus, man. Stay focus.
Rachel never wavered in her testimony and her account coincides with the cumulative narrative that the other witnesses have testified to. No, she didn’t fuck it up for the Martins.
She held it together and didn’t let the defence trip her up, no matter how much that fucker tried.
The way the social media is tearing her apart, is exactly the reason why some people are unwilling to testify.
Fucking hell.
[/quote]
Serious? She changed her story multiple times, admited to lying on the stand, and calimed she couldnt read a letter becasue she cant read cursive not realized she testified that she wrote the letter earlier?
Do you even know what you are talking about or just want to defend someone blindly to support your own confirmation bias.
I am a bigot against stupidity regardless of what shade of white or brown it is.
[quote]csulli wrote:
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
A young unarmed man was killed by a fucking armed racist pig
[/quote]
How do you know he’s a racist?[/quote]
Two racists meet, one comes out alive.
[quote]csulli wrote:
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
A young unarmed man was killed by a fucking armed racist pig
[/quote]
How do you know he’s a racist?[/quote]
Becauses Mr. Zimmerman is a “creepy ass cracker.” Keep up. Foul bigots like DN and Tryvon have a world view that cannot be disturbed with facts or logic.
[quote]Jewbacca wrote:
[quote]csulli wrote:
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
A young unarmed man was killed by a fucking armed racist pig
[/quote]
How do you know he’s a racist?[/quote]
Becauses Mr. Zimmerman is a “creepy ass cracker.” Keep up. Foul bigots like DN and Tryvon have a world view that cannot be disturbed with facts or logic.[/quote]
Funny how as a people, the jews never complained or demanded special treatment for our historical plight, which can be easily argued was far worse, instead we rose up and took over the banks and hollywood. Go figure.
[quote]Waittz wrote:
Serious? She changed her story multiple times, admited to lying on the stand, and calimed she couldnt read a letter becasue she cant read cursive not realized she testified that she wrote the letter earlier? [/quote]
There are people who can write a language and not even speak it properly. She’s probably one of them. Let’s not forget English is not her first language. I’m multilingual but there are languages I can’t even speak properly but write perfectly and vice versa.
Furthermore, she was nervous, flustered and just couldn’t articulate her thoughts clearly. The most important thing is that she recounted everything she knew to be the truth about what happened before Trayvon died. I can’t defend her lying even if I understand her reasoning.
[quote]Waittz wrote:
…just want to defend someone blindly to support your own confirmation bias. [/quote]
Would it make you feel better if I’d jumped on the ‘‘she’s so stupid’’ bandwagon and post denigrating posts about her like some of you done so far?
Sue me.
[quote]Waittz wrote:
I am a bigot against stupidity regardless of what shade of white or brown it is. [/quote]
Yeah, yeah. I hear you. Let me roll my eyes till they burst out of my socket. I’ve heard that song before. It smells like a load of horse shit.
[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:
There are people who can write a language and not even speak it properly. She’s probably one of them. Let’s not forget English is not her first language. I’m multilingual but there are languages I can’t even speak properly but write perfectly and vice versa.
Furthermore, she was nervous, flustered and just couldn’t articulate her thoughts clearly. The most important thing is that she recounted everything she knew to be the truth about what happened before Trayvon died. I can’t defend her lying even if I understand her reasoning.
[/quote]
She’s a proven racist druggie and liar.
You are going out of your way to cut her a lot of slack. She in all likelihood is probably just a fucking idiot.