Trayvon Martin Trial

the look on his face LOL

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
I would like to call Precious, from the novel “Push” by Sapphire, to the stand.
[/quote]
You would not believe some of the creative spellings I’ve seen for the name “Precious” lol

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
I would like to call Precious, from the novel “Push” by Sapphire, to the stand.

there better be a highlight real of this cross examination [/quote]

Just saying…

[quote]Waittz wrote:

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
I would like to call Precious, from the novel “Push” by Sapphire, to the stand.

there better be a highlight real of this cross examination [/quote]

Just saying… [/quote]
lol

This lady testifying is unbelievable.

[quote]Waittz wrote:

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
I would like to call Precious, from the novel “Push” by Sapphire, to the stand.

there better be a highlight real of this cross examination [/quote]

Just saying… [/quote]

I’m calling HGH use from the size of the jaw line. I can see its helping her bulk quite well though, lots of mass gainz.

“If I had a son…”

  • President Obama

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
“If I had a son…”

  • President Obama[/quote]

If NBC or CNN led with that picture the world would implode.

[quote]Waittz wrote:

[quote]MaximusB wrote:
“If I had a son…”

  • President Obama[/quote]

If NBC or CNN led with that picture the world would implode. [/quote]
Someone should photoshop the Oval Office as the background for that picture.


.

After seeing the type of ghetto ass girl he would involve himself with i cant help but believe he was the same way…

I wouldnt doubt Martin attacked first

This Rachel bitch just ruined the whole thing for the Martins

the current witness makes more sense than the last one and she doesn’t even speak english

[quote]Waittz wrote:

[quote]Mr. Walkway wrote:
I would like to call Precious, from the novel “Push” by Sapphire, to the stand.

there better be a highlight real of this cross examination [/quote]

Just saying… [/quote]

Damnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn, now that is trippy

I watched the whole thing today at work and I just cannot see the prosecution winning… There is no evidence that Zimm hunted Martin down and just shot him. I am still confused on how Zimm got his ass beat so bad and Martin only got shot. If I am not mistaken he didn’t have any noticeable bruises or anything that would occur from punching. And like I said earlier, that Diamond girl was the biggest waste of a witness…

I felt as if she was talking like an idiot on purpose because when they played a recording of a testimonial she gave, you could understand her and she didn’t sound as ridiculous.

[quote]stefan128 wrote:
I watched the whole thing today at work and I just cannot see the prosecution winning… There is no evidence that Zimm hunted Martin down and just shot him. I am still confused on how Zimm got his ass beat so bad and Martin only got shot. If I am not mistaken he didn’t have any noticeable bruises or anything that would occur from punching. And like I said earlier, that Diamond girl was the biggest waste of a witness…

I felt as if she was talking like an idiot on purpose because when they played a recording of a testimonial she gave, you could understand her and she didn’t sound as ridiculous. [/quote]

That girl was def on pills. Maybe she did them beforehand to calm herself down?

[quote]SickSex6 wrote:

[quote]stefan128 wrote:
I watched the whole thing today at work and I just cannot see the prosecution winning… There is no evidence that Zimm hunted Martin down and just shot him. I am still confused on how Zimm got his ass beat so bad and Martin only got shot. If I am not mistaken he didn’t have any noticeable bruises or anything that would occur from punching. And like I said earlier, that Diamond girl was the biggest waste of a witness…

I felt as if she was talking like an idiot on purpose because when they played a recording of a testimonial she gave, you could understand her and she didn’t sound as ridiculous. [/quote]

That girl was def on pills. Maybe she did them beforehand to calm herself down?[/quote]

That thought occurred to me. It also seems to be registering to her that she can’t just flap her gums and needs to watch what she says.

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

Don’t bother with that one, Chush.

You should check the PWI, I remember one poster calling him out regarding frequently posting racially offensive giffs.
[/quote]

“Chush?”

Since when do you call me THAT? :slight_smile:

And, I think you owe me one or two things… :wink:

Meh, there are few people here that I out and out dismiss from the jump.

Mr. Dog is one of them. [/quote]

Every so seldom an American story will arise having to do with a black being “killed” (Zimmerman case has not been decided as murder) or “offended” (Paula Deen Food Network she once used the N word)and in a flood rush to convict the non black… GUILT is subliminally flashed across the globe.

How could anyone allow a young (insert media used photo of a twelve year old Trayvon from five years ago in hoody sweat shirt) boy who buys skittles to be murdered by an angry, white guilt ridden gun toting (insert media photo of Zimmerman in jail orange jumpsuit) non black person nearly 30.

Do any of you liberals understand what the movie the Matrix was conveying? That the suspension of your beliefs are necessary for what your mind takes in and digests each day from most media.

Your mind filters information “allowed” to you through your tv, internet, print media deciding which reality you believe. This reality as perceived by most humans is actually a simulated reality called “the Matrix”, created to subdue the human population.

Most news networks / media do not produce outright lies they omit stories and shape ideas by what they allow on air through their network. For instance 95% of liberal believe FOX News is this way (FAUX News) but would never accuse their favorite chosen media outlets to fool them. Why is this? It is the suspension of belief, ideas paralleled in the Matrix movie that molds our acceptance of certain beliefs.

In other words there is a big magic show going on in the media and our school classrooms that is fooling a great many of you. How can so many not do simple math, or know what language is spoken in South American Brazil or tell you the years that WWII occurred but know the name of who wouldn’t give up their bus seat 58 years ago in U.S. history?

Evidence? Well it is a common misnomer that women cannot be sexist and that blacks cannot be racist.

I once worked with a woman supervisor who went on male bashing tirades when they didn’t perform in field tasks as she saw fit. When a lawsuit was brought upon her she was quoted as saying I’m not sexist, I’m a woman how can I be sexist? Suspension of beliefs about that she surrounded herself with, led to that statement. It abounds in many forms throughout liberalism.

In other words when a black calls you a honky white cracker in a tirade understand they surrounded themselves with people and organizations that decided they can call you derogatory names and it’s not racial but you can’t do same to them.

[quote]conservativedog wrote:

[quote]Chushin wrote:

[quote]DarkNinjaa wrote:

Don’t bother with that one, Chush.

You should check the PWI, I remember one poster calling him out regarding frequently posting racially offensive giffs.
[/quote]

“Chush?”

Since when do you call me THAT? :slight_smile:

And, I think you owe me one or two things… :wink:

Meh, there are few people here that I out and out dismiss from the jump.

Mr. Dog is one of them. [/quote]

Every so seldom an American story will arise having to do with a black being “killed” (Zimmerman case has not been decided as murder) or “offended” (Paula Deen Food Network she once used the N word)and in a flood rush to convict the non black… GUILT is subliminally flashed across the globe.

How could anyone allow a young (insert media used photo of a twelve year old Trayvon from five years ago in hoody sweat shirt) boy who buys skittles to be murdered by an angry, white guilt ridden gun toting (insert media photo of Zimmerman in jail orange jumpsuit) non black person nearly 30.

Do any of you liberals understand what the movie the Matrix was conveying? That the suspension of your beliefs are necessary for what your mind takes in and digests each day from most media.

Your mind filters information “allowed” to you through your tv, internet, print media deciding which reality you believe. This reality as perceived by most humans is actually a simulated reality called “the Matrix”, created to subdue the human population.

Most news networks / media do not produce outright lies they omit stories and shape ideas by what they allow on air through their network. For instance 95% of liberal believe FOX News is this way (FAUX News) but would never accuse their favorite chosen media outlets to fool them. Why is this? It is the suspension of belief, ideas paralleled in the Matrix movie that molds our acceptance of certain beliefs.

In other words there is a big magic show going on in the media and our school classrooms that is fooling a great many of you. How can so many not do simple math, or know what language is spoken in South American Brazil or tell you the years that WWII occurred but know the name of who wouldn’t give up their bus seat 58 years ago in U.S. history?

Evidence? Well it is a common misnomer that women cannot be sexist and that blacks cannot be racist.

I once worked with a woman supervisor who went on male bashing tirades when they didn’t perform in field tasks as she saw fit. When a lawsuit was brought upon her she was quoted as saying I’m not sexist, I’m a woman how can I be sexist? Suspension of beliefs about that she surrounded herself with, led to that statement. It abounds in many forms throughout liberalism.

In other words when a black calls you a honky white cracker in a tirade understand they surrounded themselves with people and organizations that decided they can call you derogatory names and it’s not racial but you can’t do same to them.

[/quote]

Here is my take on the whole racial term issue. Heads up, I am white. So…anyway I have said the N-Word before, I do it when listening to music, I am reciting the lyrics. No, I do not yell the lyrics or same them very loud but I like to be able to recite the songs I am listening to. I have never said it in a derogatory way and I never will. It is not necessary. When others I am around have said it in a derogatory way I condemn it and tell them that it is not necessary.

Now, if a black person were to call me a cracker, honestly, I do not care. I do not care when I am called a lot of things unless it is by like my family members i.e. my brothers. And in those instances I may be frustrated so it gets to me. Other than that I do not have any issue with being called a cracker.

The double standard has to go though. For example the Paula Dean things as you stated. So she says it and there is no forgiveness, she is absolutely losing her cooking “empire”. But when the witness says that saying cracker isn’t racial she is just ignorant. That is the most ridiculous thing ever. All races need to be held accountable when using derogatory names such as the ones I stated above. It will not ever happen but it needs to be addressed. I also think it goes to show that Martin had sort of a negative idea that night about Zimmerman. And yes, I know he was following him, I am just saying it was preconceived.