Tokyo Rosie (O'Donnell)

[vroom]

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
Well, wrong again - I responded directly to something you wrote.[/quote]

Fuck, there’s no end to your idiot antics is there?

Of course you were responding to something I wrote, and basically, because I was responding in exasperation to ridiculous posts, you saw an opening and went for it.

Bully for you ego boy!

Now, from now on, we are all going to need you - on every post - to include a list of who is eligible to respond to your commentary and who is not. There seems to be a disconnect - I, for one, assumed that when you wrote something, it was fair game to respond to it. I had no idea your Highness got to segregate who would reply and who would not - so this list may be a good idea for all of us. After all, you don’t handle them well, and we certainly don’t want to ask too much of you.

Holy fuck. Whine much?

And, of course, we still have no answers as to why I have “no idea what issues people have considered” (direct quote), but you do know.

Another direct indication you are a complete moron. I referred to a ineffable “some people” whereas you referred to “everyone”, and there is a huge difference between the two.

I’m sure you have no idea what I’m talking about, you never do. Once you can see the difference, come on back and we’ll have something to talk about. Until then, every time you say I haven’t given an answer, you simply look more foolish.

Still no answer. You said it - and I can’t figure out the distinction. Hmm.

Moron.

This line of insults (along with the endless stream of them - what a surprise) would serve you well if we were both five years old. Since only one of us is five, it is a wasted effort.

Yes, I can tell how wasted the effort is by yourself and Nuthunter’s responses, as well as all the supporting circle jerks the two of you need to pat your backs. Yeah, good job guys, you rock!

Clowns.

If you actually wanted to discuss something, you could go back to the issues raised, where Nuthunter and I were arguing about the nature of humanity. That’s the topic at hand. You, for some strange reason, are always trying to find a way to knock me down, twisting the subject into back and forth attack and defense.

You idiots started the attacks and mischaracterizations… don’t whine about the fact you aren’t very good at it. It just makes you look even more pathetic…

[thunderbolt23]

[quote]vroom wrote:
(text)[/quote]

It always ends the same with Vroom. Oh well.

[Headhunter]

[quote]vroom wrote:

If you actually wanted to discuss something, you could go back to the issues raised, where Nuthunter and I were arguing about the nature of humanity. That’s the topic at hand. [/quote]

It is? I thought we were talking about my analogy between Tokyo Rose and Rosie O’Donnell.

She now is ranting on about how 9/11 was an internal conspiracy. How sad that this person isn’t laughed off the stage.

[vroom]

[quote]Headhunter wrote:
It is? I thought we were talking about my analogy between Tokyo Rose and Rosie O’Donnell.

She now is ranting on about how 9/11 was an internal conspiracy. How sad that this person isn’t laughed off the stage.[/quote]

You know damned well what you and I were arguing about… I don’t think anybody addressed your analogy as a serious topic of conversation in this thread.

Anyhow, Rosie is a nitwit. There’s no debate to be had there.

[vroom]

[quote]thunderbolt23 wrote:
It always ends the same with Vroom. Oh well.
[/quote]

Sniff. Sniff. Vroom this. Vroom that.

[Zap_Branigan]

[quote]vroom wrote:
Headhunter wrote:
…You know damned well what you and I were arguing about… [/quote]

He is the only one. My eyes were glazing over.

[vroom]

[quote]Zap Branigan wrote:
He is the only one. My eyes were glazing over. [/quote]

LOL, yeah, mine too, but before that happened…

[Nominal_Prospect]

[quote]Ren wrote:

Media Analyst Defends Rosie O'Donnell's ‘Radical Christianity’ Comments

Someone should remind her that a bunch of murderers, rapists, pedophiles, and other such bad people are mothers and fathers. If we give them a big group hug they’d stop molesting 5 year olds or whatever it is they are doing?

Dumb bitch.[/quote]

The part about the “group hug” wasn’t in quotations; Rosie O’Donnell didn’t actually say it. Were you aware of that? Just checking…

I agree with that particular comment, though not with her views in general. What the comment illustrates is that the terrorists are subject to the same principles of human nature that apply to everyone. Understanding their motives is really the only way to effectively combat them. I don’t believe in striking out of fear or anger.

I believe in cold, calculated responses designed to dismantle the underlying causes of the problems they address.