Old man lifts the cloud and you’ll be witness to it!
@Brant_Drake
The boomer generation made the mistake that lifting was bad. Who do you think told them that…..,I know, those pesky politicians controlling the media but they were not smart enough to experiment.
Complaining about the effect new forms of media have on the youth is not a new thing.
Television (1950s)
"The TV set is becoming a third parent… [children] sit frozen in front of the screen, losing the habit of active play and the use of their own imaginations."
— Joost Meerloo, The Rape of the Mind (1956)
Radio (1930s)
"Parents have become aware of a puzzling change in their children… they sit around the radio for hours, absorbed in thriller stories, developing a ‘radio-habit’ that replaces healthy outdoor activity."
— Gramophone magazine editorial (1930s)
The Novel (1700s–1800s)
"The free access which many young people have to romances and novels is a grievance of no small magnitude… it produces a love of adventure and a spirit of dissipation."
— The Reverend Enos Hitchcock (1790)
The Printing Press (1400s–1500s)
"The abundance of books makes men less studious; it destroys memory and enfeebles the mind by relieving it of the discipline of learning by heart."
— Hieronimo Squarciafico (1477)
The Written Word (Ancient Greece)
"This discovery of yours will create forgetfulness in the learners’ souls, because they will not use their memories; they will trust to the external written characters and not remember of themselves."
— Socrates (as recorded by Plato in Phaedrus, c. 370 BCE)
I think most of us realize how dumb we were at that age as we get older. Societal pressures work much better on an 18yr old than they do on a 40yr old. My first presidential election, I voted for John Kerry. I am so embarrassed to say that. But, I was a dumbass, as most are at 18. I’d be for raising the voting age to 26.
You could argue that economic pressures work better on a 40 year old to maintain a system, even if it’s crappy.
I know it does on me.
No, voting should be done by the people it will affect for longer periods of time. Now I’d be for capping it at a certain age, because those policies won’t matter to them when they’re dead.
And of course thru history the powers try to only allow specific content to reach the people on these tools so they can remain dumb.
It’s not necessarily the tools, it’s the limited content.
I could get behind that. Why not both? Start at 26, end at 75? But then again, by that logic elected officials would be held to the same standard. Can’t hold office until you’re 26, and have to be out after you turn 75.
We already do it. Can’t run for president until you’re 35. Why?
I’ve wondered if a tiered system might work, especially to create a constant base of politically involved young people. Like, you can vote in local elections at 16, state elections at 18, and federal elections at 21.
Although if you can get drafted without voting nationally, that’s something that needs to be addressed.
Imagine having a young person who can live off Mac and cheese and Ramon (Aye Oh See 5years ago) controlling how an old person should live…………
My point is I’m not big on all your “change” stuff. Chit ain’t fair and it never will be because I know how people are but I’m concerned about how the old are, to me that says a lot. If we live in a place where a lot of people are able to do well at age 85, I’m down. To me that is most important, being young is being invincible and that’s how I felt being young. I never got upset for an older person having anything which a lot of these kids are doing now. There is a pure hatred for the boomers and today’s youth. I don’t like many boomers but I’m still down for a system that shows older folks can be mostly well off.