If nobody else accepts your challenge I’ll tell you the answer.
The slave picture is an ugly argument:
First of all, most people didn’t deny their humanity, but saw slavery as something not inherintly immoral (“we’ve always done it; even the bible has no problem with it yaddayadda”).
It also establishes an unpleasant tone for the debate since racism is STILL such a minefield - I can’t help but feel it does a huge disservice to a potential civil discussion.
My main argument would be the aspect of adoption.
If no one cares for a newborn, it dies.
In all of nature, females have to be willing to provide nurture.
And with humans you need so much more- starting with love.
If a mother won’t love her child it’s not my place to tell here otherwise.
Maybe on day we can transfer a three month old fetus into a synthetic womb for pennis. This might change he discussion, however, there still must be loving parents to-be, waiting for their adoptive child.
Also, since overpopulation is, by far, mankind’s problem numero uno, we have to consider every option.
The baby you have posted has human dna at a percentage of 100%, so it is a human.Not a functional one, but human nontheless. It has NOT a fully fuctional brain nor movement patterns. It has the potential to become a functional human, but yet it isn’t. In my book, we can terminate it’s life whenever we see it as necessary.
Among featherless bipeds, LeVar Burton was never a good actor and does not have the potential to be one.
This is in contradistinction to the subject in Mak’s photo, which might have become both featherless and a good actor.
If that is the same troll picture I’ve seen used before, it is a picture of an elephant fetus in the womb.
Doesn’t change the argument, and is simply just another telling way in which hard line “liberals” justify the removal of an otherwise healthy human from the womb by a third party as something we should celebrate…
I think one litmus test whether one is really for abortion is, if it were possible, whether they would have no second thought stomping
on a human fetus with the heel of their shoe and squashing it like a little bug.
[quote]countingbeans wrote:
If that is the same troll picture I’ve seen used before, it is a picture of an elephant fetus in the womb.
[/quote]
Yep. It’s not human. Do a DNA analysis, it’s not human. It isn’t part of an already established and individual human life cycle as a human fetus would be. It’s an elephant.
A fitting end to an elephant thread.
Get it? End? She’s holding a bag up to the ele…
Ah, forget it.
Yup.
And now, Makavali, I can tell you the punch line.
When is a Paki not a human?
When it’s a Pachy-derm.
"When is a Paki not a human?
When it’s a Pachy-derm."
That’s a fuckin’ self described ''punch line"?..not funny…don’t give up your day job in
search of a career in stand-up if that’s your goal when you grow up.
[quote]DrSkeptix wrote:
Among featherless bipeds, LeVar Burton was never a good actor and does not have the potential to be one.
This is in contradistinction to the subject in Mak’s photo, which might have become both featherless and a good actor.[/quote]
Best work of LeVar Burton.
By far.
Welllll…IDK about that, Lavar’s ‘sidekick’ performance alongside Steve Mqueen in THE HUNTER was pretty good,
a role that was originally intended for a DOG.
You see? We ARE progressing!
[quote]Makavali wrote:
And if you want to think otherwise, you are are wrong.
Discuss.
EDIT: Removed the word fool, as I can certainly see why some people would choose to believe this is human. Misguided is perhaps a better word.[/quote]
Sooooo, is it a monkey? Don’t leave us hanging!
EDIT:obviously i’m a dumbass and didn’t see the post that apparently concluded that the OP is a troll and the fetus is an elephant duh-duh
It’s not. Thanks.
Are you as unpleasant in real life?
[quote]theBeth wrote:
[quote]Makavali wrote:
And if you want to think otherwise, you are are wrong.
Discuss.
EDIT: Removed the word fool, as I can certainly see why some people would choose to believe this is human. Misguided is perhaps a better word.[/quote]
Sooooo, is it a monkey? Don’t leave us hanging![/quote]
It’s actually an elephant. Makavali is taking advantage of the fact, noted by Ernst Haekel and other biologists, that many species go through similar permutations throughout their gestational process. To the extent that if you go back far enough, an elephant fetus is practically indistinguishable from that of a human. He could have used a chimpanzee, a dog or a killer whale, it wouldn’t have made that much difference.
Only as equally unpleasant as posting one too many Batman logo 'Staches and Chest hairs pics for kicks
and giggles…teeee heeeee!
“It’s actually an elephant. Makavali is taking advantage of the fact, noted by Ernst Haekel and other biologists, that many species go through similar permutations throughout their gestational process. To the extent that if you go back far enough, an elephant fetus is practically indistinguishable from that of a human. He could have used a chimpanzee, a dog or a killer whale, it wouldn’t have made that much difference.”
Apparently to ‘beths’ little mind it what KIND of fetus it was seemed to be a matter of great importance.
‘‘don’t leave us hanging…’‘don’t leave us hanging’’, as if this person was waiting on the revelation of a Sherlock Holmes
plot, or who actually killed JFK.
Did you really need to answer that question?..I would have told beth to use his or her fucking brain and go back and read the previous posts and also look at the fetus itself and observe that it has a fucking tail.
Deleted because i wasn’t hip to the sly ruse. Post workout cloudiness lol
For the record, human embryos also have tails.
And thank you for answering my question.