[quote]pch2 wrote:
Hotness isn’t the issue, it’s why I didn’t put it in SAMA. It doesn’t matter how hot she is. Would you consider her a Figure Athlete?[/quote]
Are jockey’s considered athletes?
Because mounting that horse face would then make you an athlete.
I’m sorry, I’ll stop ruining your thread.
No she looks like someone who doesn’t eat with over inflated boobs.[/quote]
I don’t think Heidi Montag’s face is that bad…not nearly a ten, but not that bad. I think some of you guys are forgetting what a truly ugly face looks like, so here is one. [/quote]
An example when someone should thank you for knocking their teeth out!
Are we talking figure athlete or figure competitor… The latter she is clearly not… But I have no clue what a “figure athlete” is… Pretty sure the guys over at the other side made that one up.
As far as I’m concerned she is some random skinny chick who looks like she has never lifted a weight in her life, even though she supposedly does lift.
And she’s got to be the lamest female on the planet. Ever.
She did not show anything in her playboy shoot.
What the hell, her girl-card should be revoked.
I applaud all things hateful towards that waste of life, but she’s not exactly the first not-figure-competitor picture put into the figure athlete section on the front page.
[quote]red04 wrote:
I applaud all things hateful towards that waste of life, but she’s not exactly the first not-figure-competitor picture put into the figure athlete section on the front page.[/quote]
Yeah I know, but she’s a great example of it. It either shouldn’t be called Figure Athlete or should have actual FA’s.
[quote]red04 wrote:
I applaud all things hateful towards that waste of life, but she’s not exactly the first not-figure-competitor picture put into the figure athlete section on the front page.[/quote]
Yeah I know, but she’s a great example of it. It either shouldn’t be called Figure Athlete or should have actual FA’s. [/quote]
Denise Milani isn’t a figure athlete either, but she can pretend for as long as she likes…
If I’m not mistaken in “figure athlete” there’s the word “athlete”. She’s a slim woman sporting fake boobs. My wife has the same body type (minus the fake boobs) without working out nor dieting.
[quote]red04 wrote:
I applaud all things hateful towards that waste of life, but she’s not exactly the first not-figure-competitor picture put into the figure athlete section on the front page.[/quote]
Yeah I know, but she’s a great example of it. It either shouldn’t be called Figure Athlete or should have actual FA’s. [/quote]
My 2 cents - they should put it in quotes. As in Figure “Athletes”
If you’re going to call it “figure athlete” put up some hot figure girls, or bodybuilders, or even fit female athletes. If you’re going to post girls like that, call it what it is. I’m thinking something like “fap of the day”.
I don’t care what they post up there, but I hate to see “athlete” used when these girls clearly are not.
[quote]buckeye girl wrote:
If you’re going to call it “figure athlete” put up some hot figure girls, or bodybuilders, or even fit female athletes. If you’re going to post girls like that, call it what it is. I’m thinking something like “fap of the day”.
I don’t care what they post up there, but I hate to see “athlete” used when these girls clearly are not.[/quote]
I concur!
It’s a joke. Doesn’t give a lot of credibility to the supplements either IMO. If I use Biotest my muscles with atrophy and my tits will inflate 10x? Noooooooot what I want.
[quote]buckeye girl wrote:
If you’re going to call it “figure athlete” put up some hot figure girls, or bodybuilders, or even fit female athletes. If you’re going to post girls like that, call it what it is. I’m thinking something like “fap of the day”.
I don’t care what they post up there, but I hate to see “athlete” used when these girls clearly are not.[/quote]
I concur!
It’s a joke. Doesn’t give a lot of credibility to the supplements either IMO. If I use Biotest my muscles with atrophy and my tits will inflate 10x? Noooooooot what I want.[/quote]
[quote]buckeye girl wrote:
If you’re going to call it “figure athlete” put up some hot figure girls, or bodybuilders, or even fit female athletes. If you’re going to post girls like that, call it what it is. I’m thinking something like “fap of the day”.
I don’t care what they post up there, but I hate to see “athlete” used when these girls clearly are not.[/quote]
I concur!
It’s a joke. Doesn’t give a lot of credibility to the supplements either IMO. If I use Biotest my muscles with atrophy and my tits will inflate 10x? Noooooooot what I want.[/quote]
[quote]pch2 wrote:
Hotness isn’t the issue, it’s why I didn’t put it in SAMA. It doesn’t matter how hot she is. Would you consider her a Figure Athlete?[/quote]
Are jockey’s considered athletes?
Because mounting that horse face would then make you an athlete.
I’m sorry, I’ll stop ruining your thread.
No she looks like someone who doesn’t eat with over inflated boobs.[/quote]
I don’t think Heidi Montag’s face is that bad…not nearly a ten, but not that bad. I think some of you guys are forgetting what a truly ugly face looks like, so here is one. [/quote]
Heidi def. has the jawline of a prized fighter tho.
[quote]red04 wrote:
I applaud all things hateful towards that waste of life, but she’s not exactly the first not-figure-competitor picture put into the figure athlete section on the front page.[/quote]
Yeah I know, but she’s a great example of it. It either shouldn’t be called Figure Athlete or should have actual FA’s. [/quote]
Denise Milani isn’t a figure athlete either, but she can pretend for as long as she likes…
