There's a Lot Wrong with Britain

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:
Sifu wrote:

Oh yes they do have home invasions in Britian. This is in todays paper!

Couple of points for you as you don’t seem to be able to get see past your own sensationalism.

The crime being discribed in the news report is very, very different from a couple of unarmed sneak burglars breaking into a house then running away when they discover it is occupied.

Secondly, even in your favourite comic they describe it as a burglary. The reason for that is that the crime is Burglary. There is no such crime in the UK as Home Invasion.

And in the UK you still have the right to use a gun for self defence, what you don’t have the right for is to own a gun for self defence.

Oh you can use a gun for self defense but you can’t own one for that purpose. So Britain is still the worlds leader in bullshit!

No, you are the world leader in bullshit. Again and again I have pointed out the gapping innacuracies in what you post.

There is also no evidence that the burglars had robbed Martin in the past, this was just suposition brought up by Martin’s lawyers to help with his defence.

You are so full of shit. According to everything I have read there were numerous police reports by Martin and his neighbors. Several of Martins neighbors stated that they believe it was the same gang that hit their houses.

Everything you have read is the Daily Mail, the BNP Manifesto and Mein Kampf so that doesn’t surprise me in the slightest.[/quote]

Home invasion in the UK is called breaking and entering. That is a crime.

As for the Martin case. As far as I recall there was plenty of evidence against them and I was reading the independent and the observer at that point. Since when did an Englishman’s house cease to be his castle?

[quote]lou21 wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Sifu wrote:

Oh yes they do have home invasions in Britian. This is in todays paper!

Couple of points for you as you don’t seem to be able to get see past your own sensationalism.

The crime being discribed in the news report is very, very different from a couple of unarmed sneak burglars breaking into a house then running away when they discover it is occupied.

Secondly, even in your favourite comic they describe it as a burglary. The reason for that is that the crime is Burglary. There is no such crime in the UK as Home Invasion.

And in the UK you still have the right to use a gun for self defence, what you don’t have the right for is to own a gun for self defence.

Oh you can use a gun for self defense but you can’t own one for that purpose. So Britain is still the worlds leader in bullshit!

No, you are the world leader in bullshit. Again and again I have pointed out the gapping innacuracies in what you post.

There is also no evidence that the burglars had robbed Martin in the past, this was just suposition brought up by Martin’s lawyers to help with his defence.

You are so full of shit. According to everything I have read there were numerous police reports by Martin and his neighbors. Several of Martins neighbors stated that they believe it was the same gang that hit their houses.

Everything you have read is the Daily Mail, the BNP Manifesto and Mein Kampf so that doesn’t surprise me in the slightest.

Home invasion in the UK is called breaking and entering. That is a crime.

As for the Martin case. As far as I recall there was plenty of evidence against them and I was reading the independent and the observer at that point. Since when did an Englishman’s house cease to be his castle?[/quote]

It didn’t. If you tell someone to leave and they still continue towards you then you can use reasonable force to defend yourself. If they turn and run however, shooting them in the back is considered murder.

By the way, Breaking and Entering is not the same as the US crime of Home Invasion.

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:
Chushin wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:

And the point is this is a non story. Someone fucked up, once it was brought to people’s attention, it was realised that someone fucked up. End of.

Maybe.

IF that situation has been rectified.

But you’ve said similar things about the knife issue and the woman sued for “insulting” Muslims…

I honestly don’t know if you’re right or not, but it certainly appears that you may be trying to minimize the significance of such things.

Knife issue is a non issue. The newspaper misrepresented the facts.

Insulting Muslims case has not come before a court yet and none of the facts are in the public domain. I reserve judgement on the case until the facts are available instead of falling for the Daily Mail’s facist propeganda.

This latest case seems to be a storm in a teacup. Hopefully the officers involved get at the very least a serious bollocking for being stupid and wasting people’s time.[/quote]

Actually the incitement to racial hatred are used pretty much on a monthly basis by the police as an easy way of hitting arrest and questioning targets. Most of the victims of this particularly odious law don’t want to fight and therefore have the charges in the open and just leave with a caution. I say just but a caution obviously is usable as evidence against the victim in future cases and of course being arrested and questioned in the UK puts you on a national dna database. Both of these are violations of basic rights we used to have. I will not quote my sources on this one. I suggest you ask around some white friends who actually live in the UK. You should find someone fairly quickly if they are prepared to admit to it- it’s a rather socially unacceptable thing to have on record.

Enough wrong with Britain yet? Or shall we start to look at how the anti terror laws are used and what basic rights they erode? Here I’d start to ask around some asian and black friends. You shouldn’t take so long because being stopped and searched for absolutely no reason isn’t so widely accepted socially…

Different strokes for different folks but all part of the same package.

Unfortunately the BNP are standing up and providing an alternative to the establishment. This is the problem when all the major parties lack creditability. I’d hate to see the BNP in charge of anything but I guess they’ll be playing a bigger part in UK politics in the next couple of years.

OH and
fascist
propaganda
judgment

[quote]lou21 wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Chushin wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:

And the point is this is a non story. Someone fucked up, once it was brought to people’s attention, it was realised that someone fucked up. End of.

Maybe.

IF that situation has been rectified.

But you’ve said similar things about the knife issue and the woman sued for “insulting” Muslims…

I honestly don’t know if you’re right or not, but it certainly appears that you may be trying to minimize the significance of such things.

Knife issue is a non issue. The newspaper misrepresented the facts.

Insulting Muslims case has not come before a court yet and none of the facts are in the public domain. I reserve judgement on the case until the facts are available instead of falling for the Daily Mail’s facist propeganda.

This latest case seems to be a storm in a teacup. Hopefully the officers involved get at the very least a serious bollocking for being stupid and wasting people’s time.

Actually the incitement to racial hatred are used pretty much on a monthly basis by the police as an easy way of hitting arrest and questioning targets. Most of the victims of this particularly odious law don’t want to fight and therefore have the charges in the open and just leave with a caution. I say just but a caution obviously is usable as evidence against the victim in future cases and of course being arrested and questioned in the UK puts you on a national dna database. Both of these are violations of basic rights we used to have. I will not quote my sources on this one. I suggest you ask around some white friends who actually live in the UK. You should find someone fairly quickly if they are prepared to admit to it- it’s a rather socially unacceptable thing to have on record.

Enough wrong with Britain yet? Or shall we start to look at how the anti terror laws are used and what basic rights they erode? Here I’d start to ask around some asian and black friends. You shouldn’t take so long because being stopped and searched for absolutely no reason isn’t so widely accepted socially…

Different strokes for different folks but all part of the same package.

Unfortunately the BNP are standing up and providing an alternative to the establishment. This is the problem when all the major parties lack creditability. I’d hate to see the BNP in charge of anything but I guess they’ll be playing a bigger part in UK politics in the next couple of years.

OH and
fascist
propaganda
judgment
[/quote]

I totally agree that the anti terrorism laws are a joke. The first person arrested under them was an old man who stood up and shouted abuse during a labour party conference.

Also the incitement to racial hatred laws are wrong there should be freedom of speach and freedom of the press.

Those are both things that I agree are wrong with Britain. Interestingly a lot of this type of legislation seems to have been copied from US laws.

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:
Sifu wrote:
Chushin wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:

And the point is this is a non story. Someone fucked up, once it was brought to people’s attention, it was realised that someone fucked up. End of.

Maybe.

IF that situation has been rectified.

But you’ve said similar things about the knife issue and the woman sued for “insulting” Muslims…

I honestly don’t know if you’re right or not, but it certainly appears that you may be trying to minimize the significance of such things.

You are seeing a pattern here aren’t you. Where we point osmething out then Cock comes in and tells us “there’s nothing wrong here, move along along, nothing to see move along, don’t think about it Move along”.

Knowing what the British are like it would not surprise me in the least to find out that Cock is a government employed spin doctor who is paid to troll message boards to disarm debate and quell dissent…

There certainly is a theme to all of Cock’s posts that there is nothing wrong with Britain whatsoever. Everything in Britain is wonderfully wonderful, anything that might look bad to the outside observer is just a misunderstanding because everything in Britain is wonderful.

Oh and get this. Cock isn’t a Guardianista he’s a Tory?!?!?! The Labour government cabinet is full of Marxists Internationalists who have ruined, turned the country into a police state and turned the country into a multi tribal mess that is breaking apart. But we never hear our resident Tory say anything critical of Nu-Liebour. For someone who claims not to be a Guardianista he certainly has the mindset of one.

If you look back through my posts you will see plenty where I happily discuss a number of things that are very wrong in the UK.

What I am not prepared to do is have an ignorant, facist, racist purveyor of propaganda spread their lies and misrepresentations without calling them on it. [/quote]

If anyone is facist or racist it is you Guardianistas. You Guardianistas are the ones who use race as a weapon. There are races that you favor and can’t do enough for like the Pakistanis and there are races that you despise and want to harm like the British.

[quote]
The issues in the UK would not be solved by giving everyone guns or by sending all the non-white, non-Christians ‘home’. These are your two suggestions and they are both as retarded as you are.[/quote]

Again you make ridiculous exagerations. None of us has suggested giving everyone guns. Everyone didn’t have a gun before the 97 gun ban. All that is needed is for criminals to know that there guns out there that they could run into if they get out of line and it has a chilling effect on them. That is why there was such a massive rise in gun crime in response to the 97 ban.

I also have not suggested send home all the non white, non Christians. All I have suggested is cutting off the flood of new immigrants. The only people who need to be sent home are the illegals, failed and bogus asylum seekers and the muslims.

The Jamaicans, Chineese, Nepalese and Indians are not white and they are not all Christian, but they are alright, because they are not trying to sieze control of the society and change it into a theocratic dictatorship.

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:
lou21 wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Sifu wrote:

Oh yes they do have home invasions in Britian. This is in todays paper!

Couple of points for you as you don’t seem to be able to get see past your own sensationalism.

The crime being discribed in the news report is very, very different from a couple of unarmed sneak burglars breaking into a house then running away when they discover it is occupied.

Secondly, even in your favourite comic they describe it as a burglary. The reason for that is that the crime is Burglary. There is no such crime in the UK as Home Invasion.

And in the UK you still have the right to use a gun for self defence, what you don’t have the right for is to own a gun for self defence.

Oh you can use a gun for self defense but you can’t own one for that purpose. So Britain is still the worlds leader in bullshit!

No, you are the world leader in bullshit. Again and again I have pointed out the gapping innacuracies in what you post.

There is also no evidence that the burglars had robbed Martin in the past, this was just suposition brought up by Martin’s lawyers to help with his defence.

You are so full of shit. According to everything I have read there were numerous police reports by Martin and his neighbors. Several of Martins neighbors stated that they believe it was the same gang that hit their houses.

Everything you have read is the Daily Mail, the BNP Manifesto and Mein Kampf so that doesn’t surprise me in the slightest.

Home invasion in the UK is called breaking and entering. That is a crime.

As for the Martin case. As far as I recall there was plenty of evidence against them and I was reading the independent and the observer at that point. Since when did an Englishman’s house cease to be his castle?

It didn’t. If you tell someone to leave and they still continue towards you then you can use reasonable force to defend yourself. If they turn and run however, shooting them in the back is considered murder.

By the way, Breaking and Entering is not the same as the US crime of Home Invasion.[/quote]

Are they are mainly different BECAUSE the British are not allowed to defend ourselves? If not please enlighten me.

And yes if someone smashes their way into my house in the dark and I didn’t know what was going on, after threats had already been made against my person and my property I’d strongly argue that I had the full right to shoot them in the front the back the face or the arse. Currently the UK law thinks differently and I don’t fancy prison so I’d probably not do so.

They had the full right not to break into the guys house. Just by being there they were committing a crime… I say let people defend themselves at home.

[quote]Cockney Blue wrote:
lou21 wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Chushin wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:

And the point is this is a non story. Someone fucked up, once it was brought to people’s attention, it was realised that someone fucked up. End of.

Maybe.

IF that situation has been rectified.

But you’ve said similar things about the knife issue and the woman sued for “insulting” Muslims…

I honestly don’t know if you’re right or not, but it certainly appears that you may be trying to minimize the significance of such things.

Knife issue is a non issue. The newspaper misrepresented the facts.

Insulting Muslims case has not come before a court yet and none of the facts are in the public domain. I reserve judgement on the case until the facts are available instead of falling for the Daily Mail’s facist propeganda.

This latest case seems to be a storm in a teacup. Hopefully the officers involved get at the very least a serious bollocking for being stupid and wasting people’s time.

Actually the incitement to racial hatred are used pretty much on a monthly basis by the police as an easy way of hitting arrest and questioning targets. Most of the victims of this particularly odious law don’t want to fight and therefore have the charges in the open and just leave with a caution. I say just but a caution obviously is usable as evidence against the victim in future cases and of course being arrested and questioned in the UK puts you on a national dna database. Both of these are violations of basic rights we used to have. I will not quote my sources on this one. I suggest you ask around some white friends who actually live in the UK. You should find someone fairly quickly if they are prepared to admit to it- it’s a rather socially unacceptable thing to have on record.

Enough wrong with Britain yet? Or shall we start to look at how the anti terror laws are used and what basic rights they erode? Here I’d start to ask around some asian and black friends. You shouldn’t take so long because being stopped and searched for absolutely no reason isn’t so widely accepted socially…

Different strokes for different folks but all part of the same package.

Unfortunately the BNP are standing up and providing an alternative to the establishment. This is the problem when all the major parties lack creditability. I’d hate to see the BNP in charge of anything but I guess they’ll be playing a bigger part in UK politics in the next couple of years.

OH and
fascist
propaganda
judgment

I totally agree that the anti terrorism laws are a joke. The first person arrested under them was an old man who stood up and shouted abuse during a labour party conference.

Also the incitement to racial hatred laws are wrong there should be freedom of speach and freedom of the press.

Those are both things that I agree are wrong with Britain. Interestingly a lot of this type of legislation seems to have been copied from US laws.[/quote]

The last thing I’d want is an entirely US style system. They are in some ways probably as broken as us. But they do at least still have an option to armed rebellion. Of course what good a guy in the Mid West with an assault rifle thinks he can do against a federal government that’s too out of control I don’t know.

Let’s not discuss the US they have their own problems and are big enough to sort them out themselves.

[quote]Sifu wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Sifu wrote:
Chushin wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:

And the point is this is a non story. Someone fucked up, once it was brought to people’s attention, it was realised that someone fucked up. End of.

Maybe.

IF that situation has been rectified.

But you’ve said similar things about the knife issue and the woman sued for “insulting” Muslims…

I honestly don’t know if you’re right or not, but it certainly appears that you may be trying to minimize the significance of such things.

You are seeing a pattern here aren’t you. Where we point osmething out then Cock comes in and tells us “there’s nothing wrong here, move along along, nothing to see move along, don’t think about it Move along”.

Knowing what the British are like it would not surprise me in the least to find out that Cock is a government employed spin doctor who is paid to troll message boards to disarm debate and quell dissent…

There certainly is a theme to all of Cock’s posts that there is nothing wrong with Britain whatsoever. Everything in Britain is wonderfully wonderful, anything that might look bad to the outside observer is just a misunderstanding because everything in Britain is wonderful.

Oh and get this. Cock isn’t a Guardianista he’s a Tory?!?!?! The Labour government cabinet is full of Marxists Internationalists who have ruined, turned the country into a police state and turned the country into a multi tribal mess that is breaking apart. But we never hear our resident Tory say anything critical of Nu-Liebour. For someone who claims not to be a Guardianista he certainly has the mindset of one.

If you look back through my posts you will see plenty where I happily discuss a number of things that are very wrong in the UK.

What I am not prepared to do is have an ignorant, facist, racist purveyor of propaganda spread their lies and misrepresentations without calling them on it.

If anyone is facist or racist it is you Guardianistas. You Guardianistas are the ones who use race as a weapon. There are races that you favor and can’t do enough for like the Pakistanis and there are races that you despise and want to harm like the British.
[/quote]

What a retarded thing to post. I really couldn’t care less where someone’s family is from originally I treat people as I find them and I find you to be an idiot.

[quote]

The issues in the UK would not be solved by giving everyone guns or by sending all the non-white, non-Christians ‘home’. These are your two suggestions and they are both as retarded as you are.

Again you make ridiculous exagerations. None of us has suggested giving everyone guns. Everyone didn’t have a gun before the 97 gun ban. All that is needed is for criminals to know that there guns out there that they could run into if they get out of line and it has a chilling effect on them. That is why there was such a massive rise in gun crime in response to the 97 ban.

I also have not suggested send home all the non white, non Christians. All I have suggested is cutting off the flood of new immigrants. The only people who need to be sent home are the illegals, failed and bogus asylum seekers and the muslims.

The Jamaicans, Chineese, Nepalese and Indians are not white and they are not all Christian, but they are alright, because they are not trying to sieze control of the society and change it into a theocratic dictatorship. [/quote]

But I asked you what should be done about all of the legal immigrants and your response was ‘send them home’ I actually asked you twice just to be clear on it. Now you are dick tucking and squirming like you usually do. Next thing will be a wall of text post linking stories from the Daily Mail, the other thing you do when you are backed into a corner.

[quote]lou21 wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
lou21 wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
Sifu wrote:

Oh yes they do have home invasions in Britian. This is in todays paper!

Couple of points for you as you don’t seem to be able to get see past your own sensationalism.

The crime being discribed in the news report is very, very different from a couple of unarmed sneak burglars breaking into a house then running away when they discover it is occupied.

Secondly, even in your favourite comic they describe it as a burglary. The reason for that is that the crime is Burglary. There is no such crime in the UK as Home Invasion.

And in the UK you still have the right to use a gun for self defence, what you don’t have the right for is to own a gun for self defence.

Oh you can use a gun for self defense but you can’t own one for that purpose. So Britain is still the worlds leader in bullshit!

No, you are the world leader in bullshit. Again and again I have pointed out the gapping innacuracies in what you post.

There is also no evidence that the burglars had robbed Martin in the past, this was just suposition brought up by Martin’s lawyers to help with his defence.

You are so full of shit. According to everything I have read there were numerous police reports by Martin and his neighbors. Several of Martins neighbors stated that they believe it was the same gang that hit their houses.

Everything you have read is the Daily Mail, the BNP Manifesto and Mein Kampf so that doesn’t surprise me in the slightest.

Home invasion in the UK is called breaking and entering. That is a crime.

As for the Martin case. As far as I recall there was plenty of evidence against them and I was reading the independent and the observer at that point. Since when did an Englishman’s house cease to be his castle?

It didn’t. If you tell someone to leave and they still continue towards you then you can use reasonable force to defend yourself. If they turn and run however, shooting them in the back is considered murder.

By the way, Breaking and Entering is not the same as the US crime of Home Invasion.

Are they are mainly different BECAUSE the British are not allowed to defend ourselves? If not please enlighten me.

And yes if someone smashes their way into my house in the dark and I didn’t know what was going on, after threats had already been made against my person and my property I’d strongly argue that I had the full right to shoot them in the front the back the face or the arse. Currently the UK law thinks differently and I don’t fancy prison so I’d probably not do so.

They had the full right not to break into the guys house. Just by being there they were committing a crime… I say let people defend themselves at home.

[/quote]

No they are different because the British legal system already has a crime of Breaking and Entry and crimes related to assault with a deadly weapon, commont assault, GBH etc. There is therefore no need to create a separate category of crime for breaking into a property whilst someone is inside it which would create the ludicrous situation where someone who was either stupid or wanted to try and strengthen an argument using histeria could equate a violent rape at gunpoint with an unarmed person trying to break in to a property that they believe is empty.

On your point of defending yourself within your home, I actually pretty much agree with you. That is not the current law in the UK however which is why Martin was sent down for Murder.

[quote]Chushin wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:

I totally agree that the anti terrorism laws are a joke. The first person arrested under them was an old man who stood up and shouted abuse during a labour party conference.

Also the incitement to racial hatred laws are wrong there should be freedom of speach and freedom of the press.

Those are both things that I agree are wrong with Britain. Interestingly a lot of this type of legislation seems to have been copied from US laws.

To which US laws regarding “the incitement to racial hatred” (or lack of “freedom of speach and freedom of the press”) do you refer?.
[/quote]

Title 7 of the Civil rights act 1964

18 U.S.C § 2101

18 U.S.C. § 245

Look at this today from Britain we have yet another a crime which according to Cock doesn’t exist in Britain. This is the second day in a row that we have a report of a crime which doesn’t exist.

The comments section is quite telling of just how clueless the British are as to how to deal with home invasion. Some ex-pat suggested this wouldn’t happen to them in Florida because they would shoot the bastards and they were promptly attacked.

The British are absolutely clueless. They are all asking “why couldn’t the police be there”? The British are so stupid they really do believe the police are infallible and can protect them while they think criminals are too stupid to be on the look out for the police.

The sad part is the British are so stupid that and so stubborn in their stupidity that things will have to get much worse and many people will have to needlessly be injured and killed before they change course.

Baby spattered with blood after father is stabbed 11 times by Rolex robbers who burst into their home

A baby was left covered in blood after his father was violently attacked by robbers who broke into their family home.

Ricki Hall, 39, had been feeding baby son Milan with a bottle when thugs broke into the house demanding cash and jewellery.

The car dealer was knifed 11 times in the face, leaving the two-and-a-half-month-old covered in his father’s blood.

He was told: ‘If you have any final words, say them now before we kill you.’

He was then pinned down by two of the attackers, and repeatedly stabbed by a third in a 15-minute assault.

He was then dragged into the hallway where the robbers took turns kicking him in the face and ribs before raiding the house.

Mr Hall lost two pints of blood in the attack, and suffered horrific facial injuries requiring over 40 stitches.

The attackers struck just after 9.30pm last Sunday night at Mr Hall’s £350,000 home in the upmarket suburb of Thorpe Astley in Leicester.

He said today: 'I heard a knock on the door and someone shouting “pizza delivery”.

'I answered the door to say they must have the wrong address but the moment I opened the door I was charged by three big blokes.

'They slashed me maybe 10 or 11 times with a large knife which looked like it had a very sharp serrated edge.

'They punched and kicked me to the floor and I tried to protect myself but two of them held my arms down while the third slashed me across the face.

'I kept thinking they were going to stab me in the eyes but amazingly they missed my eyes by a few centimetres.

'There was blood all over the floor and walls of the house. It was a bloodbath.
'They said they would kill me if I didn’t give them what they wanted.

‘Thankfully Milan was asleep the whole time, but he was just inches away from where I was being attacked and got covered in my blood.’

His terrified wife Zoya, 21, had been upstairs when the attackers struck, and hid in a bedroom cupboard.

She said: 'I had the phone with me but the batteries were dead. I kept trying to dial 999 but it wouldn’t work.

'I heard the robbers running upstairs and I held my breath as they emptied drawers and looked under the bed just inches away from me. It was terrifying but all I could think about was Milan.

‘I was so scared they had hurt him and when I saw Ricki I was amazed he wasn’t dead.’
The robbers stole Mr Hall’s £6,000 Rolex Submariner watch, his mobile phone and around £3,000 in cash.

Mrs Hall was able to call an ambulance from another phone, and her husband was rushed to Leicester Royal Infirmary where he underwent a three hour operation.

‘They must have been in the house for 10 or 15 minutes demanding money,’ Mr Hall continued.

'In the end they took some money, my mobile phone and my Rolex watch.

'I’m hoping the watch is the key to catching them. It’s a Rolex Submariner with a blue face. It’s worth about £6,000 and they will try to sell it to someone.

‘If anyone is offered this watch I want them to tell the police straight away. Also, they might brag about what they have done to me to other criminals.’

The businessman is offering a £5,000 reward to catch the robbers.

A spokesman for Leicestershire Constabulary said: 'The house has been cordoned off to allow forensic investigations to take place.

‘This is a particularly appalling crime and we are doing all we can to catch those responsible.’

As I stated:

Next thing will be a wall of text post linking stories from the Daily Mail, the other thing you do when you are backed into a corner.

Huge fucking LOL. Sifu you are a joke!

I present him with a picture of a man who quite obviously has had his face stitched back together and all Cockhead can do is dismiss what happened as nothing to be concerned about because the mail has covered the story.

The reason why people like Cock hate the mail is because it doesn’t try to paint Britain as some wonderful fantasy world that doesn’t reallt exist. It shows the warts. Because he can’t provide a reasonable answer to the warts he resorts to the fallback answer of “well it’s the mail”.

Since he can’t attack the message he attacks the messenger.

[quote]pushharder wrote:
Cockney Blue wrote:
As I stated:

Next thing will be a wall of text post linking stories from the Daily Mail, the other thing you do when you are backed into a corner.

Huge fucking LOL. Sifu you are a joke!

Cock, I googled, “living in denial” and the first ten hits I got had photos of you. Sifu has handed you your ass on this thread and others and all your deluded mind can think of is, “Sifu, you are a joke.” You might want to see a therapist.[/quote]

OK so I point out repeatedly that his ‘facts’ are wrong, then I even write that his only recourse is going to be posting a wall of text from the Mail and what does he do, he posts a wall of text from the Mail.

Now that might seem like someone getting their arse handed to you but senile dementure possibly has that effect.

[quote]Sifu wrote:
I present him with a picture of a man who quite obviously has had his face stitched back together and all Cockhead can do is dismiss what happened as nothing to be concerned about because the mail has covered the story.

The reason why people like Cock hate the mail is because it doesn’t try to paint Britain as some wonderful fantasy world that doesn’t reallt exist. It shows the warts. Because he can’t provide a reasonable answer to the warts he resorts to the fallback answer of “well it’s the mail”.

Since he can’t attack the message he attacks the messenger.[/quote]

What the hell are you talking about you rambling idiot? I never said that people do not occasionally get attacked in their homes in the UK. What I said was that there is no such crime on the statute books in the UK as Home Invasion.

The issue was whether Martin was acting in self defence when he shot unarmed people that were running away from him in the back. You have failed to demonstrate how.

The original issue was a claim that the Scout Association of Great Britain had banned it’s members from carrying knives. This was shown in the 3rd post to be a lie.

You have nothing to say and you are saying it far, far too loud!

[quote]pushharder wrote:
In all fairness to the Brits over the illegal daycare story, it happens in Michigan too:

http://www.wndu.com/michigan/headlines/62669077.html
[/quote]

It is stupid in both countries.