If that show aired in 2004 I’d really be interested in seeing them now…or not. I’d wager maybe two stayed hot and the rest went back to being pumpkins after midnight.
Those aren’t women, they’re just shells of their former selves. Nothing more.
I remember watching this show in horror and utter fascination. Those women went through up to 8 hours of cosmetic surgery in one shot, getting cheek implants, butt implants, boob implants, noses broken and re-set, plus tummy tucks and lipo. In one case they gave a girl a cochlear implant. Then the hours of cosmetic dentistry, although if I remember one or two of the contestants had real hillbilly grills, so that was a good thing. In bandages, they started the physical training, which looked just painful and awful, swollen faces and bruised bodies. All to make the perfect looking barbie doll, which personally I find frightening. The surgery was obvious in some cases, particularly the cheek implants and eyes and lips.
Most of those women needed a dentist, a hairdresser and a gym membership.
[quote]Nards wrote:
[quote]dshroy wrote:
[quote]Nards wrote:
There are no ugly women if you turn the lights off.[/quote]
Disagree.
Rosie O Donnell
Kathy Bates.[/quote]
OK, OK…lights off and you can’t use your hands.
[/quote]
But…my fist is the only thing kathy and rosie will want.
[quote]dianab wrote:
Most of those women needed a dentist, a hairdresser and a gym membership. [/quote]
And a scorching case of herpes.
The problem with the ‘afters’ in this case is that they all fit a cookie-cutter, Barbie doll mode of beauty. Often the proverbial girl-next-door is more appealing to guys. Or at least normal, non-douchey guys.
But I agree that aside from issues like missing teeth, most anyone (of either gender) can realize vast improvements just from eating sensible amounts of healthy food, getting off their lazy asses, and taking just a bit of pride in their appearance.
Sometimes it doesn’t even take THAT much. Case in point is another one of these makeover shows, called What Not to Wear. They will take some chick that goes to work dressed in sweats and Crocs and make her look decent just by giving her some stylish, better-fitting clothes and a new haircut.
[quote]BobParr wrote:
The problem with the ‘afters’ in this case is that they all fit a cookie-cutter, Barbie doll mode of beauty. Often the proverbial girl-next-door is more appealing to guys. Or at least normal, non-douchey guys.
[/quote]
First, I doubt that’s a problem. Second, its not even true. What you’re seeing is the cheerleader effect, and they all look alike because of similar posture and clothing, despite different facial features and skin tone.
LOL @ non-douchy guys being the norm.
Also, I think men feel the most attractive quality in a woman is availability. That’s why your girl-next-door example works. I wonder if this barbie mode of attractiveness is to women what the physique of top olympia models is to us dudes. Because I don’t know a single guy that wants to look like Ronnie Coleman (okay, I know one, but that’s not the point) but I know a bunch of guys that want to look MORE LIKE him.
Food for thought.
[quote]method_man wrote:
I wouldn’t even hit this doggy style with a picture of Beyonce taped to her back.[/quote]
me neither. this is definitely a face-to-face kinda chick.
[quote]dshroy wrote:
[quote]method_man wrote:
I wouldn’t even hit this doggy style with a picture of Beyonce taped to her back.[/quote]
me neither. this is definitely a face-to-face kinda chick.[/quote]
lol
[quote]DJHT wrote:
[/quote]
wow
well… I suppose good for them for being okay/good with being them.
But I also don’t get those pics of that woman with a bottle stuck in her belly button.
why oh why would you take that pic?
[quote]dshroy wrote:
[quote]method_man wrote:
I wouldn’t even hit this doggy style with a picture of Beyonce taped to her back.[/quote]
me neither. this is definitely a face-to-face kinda chick.[/quote]
The way that you have been jocking me on this board, I suspect you might play the catcher on Team Pink.
[quote]method_man wrote:
[quote]dshroy wrote:
[quote]method_man wrote:
I wouldn’t even hit this doggy style with a picture of Beyonce taped to her back.[/quote]
me neither. this is definitely a face-to-face kinda chick.[/quote]
The way that you have been jocking me on this board… [/quote]
What does this word mean? Serious question. Google wasn’t particularly helpful.
DJHT- like mentioned before, get these chicks a dentist, a gym membership, and some better clothing and a lot’ve’ll turn from slags to slam pieces.
Not that Meth chick though. She needs the type of facial reconstructive surgery they give to burn victims and The Question.
[quote]Otep wrote:
DJHT- like mentioned before, get these chicks a dentist, a gym membership, and some better clothing and a lot’ve’ll turn from slags to slam pieces.
Not that Meth chick though. She needs the type of facial reconstructive surgery they give to burn victims and The Question.[/quote]
Have to agree! Number 4,6 and 9 could’ve even just fucking brushed their hair and wore something with colour and seen a remarkable difference!
The extremes people go to without first making little changes =(