[quote]red bull wrote:
arabs, yes I think it would have to be arabs…[/quote]
or the arabs would have you believe it to be arabs.
When the Koran says it’s ok to fight in self defense, I can understand why arabs would want to be percieved as victims. Then, any act of aggression throughout history would seem justifiable.
Who persecuted arabs? Arabs and Muslims in general were kicking ass and taking names for centuries.
[quote]GhorigTheBeefy wrote:
Didn’t the world court just find Australia guilty for crimes against the Natives and they have to pay a shitload of money for damages? Good thing the US is at the bottom of that alphabetical list. Wonder how they’ll treat Germany at trial.[/quote]
Australia better not pay. I can’t handle bullshit like that. It will generate hatred of the Aboriginals.
They were chased out of warm parts of the globe and had to go to cold and miserable places, like England. There they developed the brains and will power to dominate the globe.
East Asians were also driven far from home but got somewhat better living conditions, such as in Japan.
All these things made the East Asians and Whites the smartest people on the planet; so they now dominate the ignorant savages in places like Zimbabwe (where the dumb fucks kill off the few remaining white farmers, the very people who feed the dumb ignorant fucks).[/quote]
Politically incorrect but true. From the Caucasians, the Slavs are the most used and abused in history. You don’t get to have the whole slave industry named after your clan for nothing.
They were chased out of warm parts of the globe and had to go to cold and miserable places, like England. There they developed the brains and will power to dominate the globe.
East Asians were also driven far from home but got somewhat better living conditions, such as in Japan.
All these things made the East Asians and Whites the smartest people on the planet; so they now dominate the ignorant savages in places like Zimbabwe (where the dumb fucks kill off the few remaining white farmers, the very people who feed the dumb ignorant fucks).[/quote]
Source?
And how do you know they weren’t trying to get away from the “dumb fucks”?
With this rhetoric I think you should move to Zimbabwe and become a farmer. Maybe you can save them; be a hero, you know? Now that’s a solution, you smart white man you.
They were chased out of warm parts of the globe and had to go to cold and miserable places, like England. There they developed the brains and will power to dominate the globe.
East Asians were also driven far from home but got somewhat better living conditions, such as in Japan.
All these things made the East Asians and Whites the smartest people on the planet; so they now dominate the ignorant savages in places like Zimbabwe (where the dumb fucks kill off the few remaining white farmers, the very people who feed the dumb ignorant fucks).
Source?
And how do you know they weren’t trying to get away from the “dumb fucks”?
With this rhetoric I think you should move to Zimbabwe and become a farmer. Maybe you can save them; be a hero, you know? Now that’s a solution, you smart white man you.[/quote]
Numerous studies have shown that IQ, independent of culture, is higher amongst East Asians (#1) and whites (#2). They were driven out of Africa, being the lower testosterone people, and kept being driven further on.
Black men have higher Testosterone levels today. This prevents them from having democracies as their test levels make them want to kill each other (Robert Mugabe, for ex). Its why most cons in prison are black. In this case, too much testosterone is a bad thing.
Black people in Africa should BEG the whites to come back and run their shitholes. I say this out of empathy for the suffering black people there.
I remember reading a study that showed there were not major testosterone differences between races. But I believe latins were the highest, white and black were statistically tied. It did say blacks actually have higher estrogen if I remember correctly though. basically, I’m calling BS.
They were chased out of warm parts of the globe and had to go to cold and miserable places, like England. There they developed the brains and will power to dominate the globe.
East Asians were also driven far from home but got somewhat better living conditions, such as in Japan.
All these things made the East Asians and Whites the smartest people on the planet; so they now dominate the ignorant savages in places like Zimbabwe (where the dumb fucks kill off the few remaining white farmers, the very people who feed the dumb ignorant fucks).
Source?
And how do you know they weren’t trying to get away from the “dumb fucks”?
With this rhetoric I think you should move to Zimbabwe and become a farmer. Maybe you can save them; be a hero, you know? Now that’s a solution, you smart white man you.
Numerous studies have shown that IQ, independent of culture, is higher amongst East Asians (#1) and whites (#2). They were driven out of Africa, being the lower testosterone people, and kept being driven further on.
Black men have higher Testosterone levels today. This prevents them from having democracies as their test levels make them want to kill each other (Robert Mugabe, for ex). Its why most cons in prison are black. In this case, too much testosterone is a bad thing.
Black people in Africa should BEG the whites to come back and run their shitholes. I say this out of empathy for the suffering black people there.
[/quote]
Never say science can’t be used for evil purposes. I’m not saying HH’s science is sound. But, he obviously believes his intepretation of it is. This scientific sectarian viewpoint is a fanaticism in itself.
Black men have higher Testosterone levels today. This prevents them from having democracies as their test levels make them want to kill each other (Robert Mugabe, for ex). Its why most cons in prison are black. In this case, too much testosterone is a bad thing.
[/quote]
There is plenty of BS in this post, but this particular passage has to be one of the most ignorant, nonsensical statements you have ever made.
The PSA tests done on older men show that what’s a death sentence for an Asian, a lot of surgery for a Caucasian, is pretty normal for black guys. That’s because they have more circulating Testosterone which converts to DHT.
Why are most NFL players black? Basketball players? Higher testosterone. This led tem, in Africa, to drive out the weaker males, who matriculated (ran away) to the farthest parts of the globe. Living conditions being worse there caused these groups to adapt by developing bigger brains. Let’s face it – when you have to expend more effort to get your meals and shelter, your group gets smarter or dies. You can’t just pick a banana off a tree in Norway.
That’s why the Chinese will rule the world, with the USA as a junior partner.
and whites (#2). They were driven out of Africa,
[/quote]
Except they were not ‘white’ when they left there.
So maybe what you are saying is the weaker black males were driven out and paled out and became the ‘whites’ high IQ civilized brutality which is our society of today.
I don’t see any core differentiation.
Both America and Britain are revealing themselves for the economic ‘shitholes’ that they really are.
[quote]DoubleDuce wrote:
I remember reading a study that showed there were not major testosterone differences between races. But I believe latins were the highest,[/quote]
I can say that applies for both male and female, from experience.
; )
And, off course that is why Brazil has only now become the fifth largest economy of the globe.
Nothing to do with being exploited by the highly brainy white superpowers of America and Britain, so capable and completely independent from the natural resources of the high testosterone ‘shithole’ countries.
The PSA tests done on older men show that what’s a death sentence for an Asian, a lot of surgery for a Caucasian, is pretty normal for black guys. That’s because they have more circulating Testosterone which converts to DHT.
Why are most NFL players black? Basketball players? Higher testosterone. This led tem, in Africa, to drive out the weaker males, who matriculated (ran away) to the farthest parts of the globe. Living conditions being worse there caused these groups to adapt by developing bigger brains. Let’s face it – when you have to expend more effort to get your meals and shelter, your group gets smarter or dies. You can’t just pick a banana off a tree in Norway.
Tomatoes dude, pound the tomatoes if you wanna keep the PSA in check. Lycopene is a beast when it comes to dealing with prostate health.
That’s why the Chinese will rule the world, with the USA as a junior partner.[/quote]
Except they were not ‘white’ when they left there.
So maybe what you are saying is the weaker black males were driven out and paled out and became the ‘whites’ high IQ civilized brutality which is our society of today.
I don’t see any core differentiation.
Both America and Britain are revealing themselves for the economic ‘shitholes’ that they really are.
[/quote]
Well, its understood that they were not white yet. They were the weaker members who were forced to the temperate zones.
HH none of this means that whites are more moral than any other race. They just find different way to persecute eachother. Economic for instance. Government corruption is rampant in sovereign nations.
[quote]meangenes wrote:
HH none of this means that whites are more moral than any other race. They just find different way to persecute eachother. Economic for instance. Government corruption is rampant in sovereign nations.
[quote]Alpha F wrote:
Someone told me that China was behind Mugabe and other African dictators.
Mauritious, as well.
Is that true?[/quote]
The Chinese are entering into mutual cooperation agreements with governments all over Africa in order to get access to raw material reserves.They have,to my knowledge,not propped up Mugabe.The S.A. government has done that almost single handedly,justifying it by virtue of their status as comrades at arms during the liberation struggle.But the Chinese are certainly expanding their sphere of influence on the continent.
[quote]Alpha F wrote:
Someone told me that China was behind Mugabe and other African dictators.
Mauritious, as well.
Is that true?[/quote]
The Chinese are very deceptive. I wouldn’t doubt that they are encouraging us to focus on Iran by giving covert support to them, so they can come to dominate Africa. Surprisingly, Africa will be a good investment in thye next 50 or 75 years, as it is such a shitcan now.
You can buy a 15000 acre ranch in South Africa for what an apartment costs in Zurich or Geneva.
[quote]Headhunter wrote:
Alpha F wrote:
Someone told me that China was behind Mugabe and other African dictators.
Mauritious, as well.
Is that true?
The Chinese are very deceptive. I wouldn’t doubt that they are encouraging us to focus on Iran by giving covert support to them, so they can come to dominate Africa.
[/quote]
That was exactly what this Belgium student told me with regards the Chinese insidious penetration in the world scene.
Completely different style from previous Empires.
Interesting.
Mugabe is one of the worst silk-suited scum tyrant Stalinist killers in Africa (ever notice his “Hitler” moustache? that is no accident!)…His “S.S.” Bodyguard unit is trained and led by North Koreans and he is propped up by fellow communist Red Chinese “advisers”…The Rhodesians made the same mistake as Hitler: Letting their own racism get in the way of victory…Black anti-communist volunteer soldiers were treated shabbily, and left in disgust when their manpower was needed most to fight off the terrorists (I know this from personal experience). Death to Mugabe!…