(long post, apology in advance)
So my wife and I attended the Advanced Covert Pistol 2-day course this weekend, put on by Handgun Combatives (Dave Spaulding) at Boondocks FTA near Jackson, MS (not sure what the FTA stands for). Dave is a great instructor, funny guy with tons of experience as a LEO. Like most instructors I’ve ever read/watched video of, he is fairly opinionated on many topics. A lot of his opinions were really more common sense than anything, though he did make a few comments that I (and the guy next to me) didn’t necessarily agree with. Nothing that would change my opinion of him as an instructor, just things that I don’t necessarily agree with, or things which are more situational than he made it sound.
Boondocks is a pretty decent facility, though I was a little thrown by their range set up. They had two short ranges facing each other (as in, firing lines facing each other) separated by a 20 foot berm. Now, from anywhere on either range, getting a round over the berm onto the next range would be pretty hard (nigh impossible), but… Maybe 50 yards behind the firing line of our range was the dirt road we used to enter and exit the range with our vehicles. A few hundred yards farther back (I am guessing at that distance), stands the classroom and pro shop buildings, along with another parking lot for those. There is, of course, a fairly densely wooded area in the intervening spaces, but still. While the berm would stop pretty much anything being used on those ranges, if someone were to put a round or two over the berm, there’s no guarantee those trees are going to stop it before impacting the other buildings, or God forbid the highway which is a bit farther back. Maybe just the military side of me, but every US military range has a sizeable impact zone behind the target area (as in, 50% farther than the maximum range of the largest caliber being used on that range) regardless of berm. But I digress.
The class itself was very good. We were told to bring minimum 800 rounds, and between the two days (and night shoot, which was an added bonus not usually included in ACP) I expended over 900 rounds. My wife and the guy next to me went through a bit less, but they were both using single stack 1911 pistols. A good amount of shooting with out being excessive, in my opinion. I’ve heard of courses that go through close to 1000 per day, which I have to question. Repetition is how you ingrain a new skill, but if volume is that high, I have to question how much of that repetition is quality and how much is just throwing lead downrange. Everyone has a saturation point for practicing a new skill in one session, and beyond that point performance begins to degrade at a fairly decent rate. So now instead of ingraining a newly learned skill properly, you are reinforcing bad habits – either reverting to old ones, or creating new ones. But again, I digress.
While the title of the course has ‘Advanced’ in it, a lot of what we did was really just basics, or fundamentals (Dave calls them essentials). Dave covered the different options for concealed carry (IWB, OWB, behind the hip, appendix, abdominal – he was adamantly opposed to the Sonny Crockett shoulder holster), and then we had the opportunity to try whichever ones we wanted. I have been carrying behind the hip for years, so I stuck with that. I do plan on picking up a good appendix or abdominal rig and trying it out, as the draw from appendix or abdominal is faster by a decent margin – it’s just not as comfortable to me.
After covering the different carry locations, he went over the different methods of garment removal (not stripping, LOL, moving the shirt enough to expose the pistol as part of the draw), working from both open front and closed front shirts. I typically carry in as little as a t-shirt, so trying the different methods actually changed the way I had been doing it. We also went over the different ready positions and when each would be appropriate.
The night portion consisted of a very brief class (Dave has an entire course for low light and dark shooting, so this was just a little taste) on the different options for operating the light and gun in tandem. We did not use weapon mounted lights at all in this, as he wanted to ‘force’ us through the different handheld light positions. Bottom line – they all suck, but some suck less. Best compromise for EDC would be a weapon mounted light, used in concert with a handheld. Use the handheld for searching or illuminating an area, then switch to the gun (and mounted light) if a threat becomes apparent.
We spent a little time on unconventional shooting positions – shooting from seated, flat on your back, and fetal position on each side. While most of us would rather not shoot from any of those positions, there is always the possibility that you might be forced into it, so it’s a good idea to at least familiarize yourself with each of the positions and what comes with them.
I’m obviously glossing over some details, and probably forgetting some others. Since Dave makes his living doing this, I don’t want to infringe on that. Bottom line – it was a great course, and I have to agree with Idaho’s assessment…if you have limited ‘throwaway’ money, spending your training budget on one of Dave’s courses is a great way to get maximum bang for your buck.
I will throw out a couple drills Dave uses, as I’m pretty sure he got them from other people (I know he said exactly that with a couple of them). Each morning as a warm up, he had us do a 3-round fade drill. Start at the 3 yard line, draw and slow-fire 3 rounds into a 3x5 card on the target backer. After each string of 3 rounds, you move farther back (or, fade) – 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 25. No time limit on each string of 3, intent being to work on sight picture, accuracy (try to stay in the card), and trigger reset – allow the trigger to reset during recoil and follow through (without slapping – takes some getting used to; still need to work on it) so as the sights arrive back on target you are ready to fire again (if necessary).
From the holster: 5 rounds in 5 seconds inside a 3x5 card, at 5 yards. We did this a few times till everyone found the proper cadence to get all 5 in the allotted time. Then, we moved back to 25 yards and did the same thing – again, trying to keep all 5 shots in the card. I did decent, though I did throw a couple outside the card (think I only threw 1 or 2 the second time).
Final drill (competition, but a drill I intend to work on): 2 x 2 x 2 drill, which he originally got from Shaw’s (Mid-South), but they called it ‘Skill On Demand’. At 20 feet, from the holster concealed (almost all of our shooting was from the holster concealed): 2 rounds in 2 seconds, inside the 3x5 card. This is a competition, and each shooter gets one chance (thus the ‘on demand’). Dave used to give away challenge coins to those who could do it, then he got hooked up with a guy who makes belts and buckles. So now Dave gives the winners a belt buckle, which you then mail to the guy who made it (forget who it was), and he makes you a nylon belt to go with it and sends it back – only thing the winner pays for is the postage to send in the buckle. I snagged on my shirt, got one round in the card and one out, with a time of 2.86. Only one guy did it, and his two shots were damn near keyholed with a time of 1.97.
Makeup of the class (16 total): military – me (retired squid), guy next to me (retired warrant officer and former SF), my wife (former Navy), and an active duty Army E8 (Cav Scout, the guy who won the 2x2x2). A Baptist minister, two doctors, and I’m not sure what everyone else did. My wife and I are in our early 40’s, and the majority of the class were older than us, some by quite a bit – oldest was 72. Then there was the guy I started calling tactical Tommy. He was wearing 5.11 pants, but just sneakers and a hoodie (from another training site). Day 1, he was wearing two guns – one behind the hip, one appendix. He would switch back and forth between which one he was drawing at a whim, and if one ran dry he would literally throw it on the ground and draw the other rather than reload – even if it was his Glock with an RMR on it. Day 2, he was (and I am not joking, not even a little) wearing 4 guns. That I know of. Two appendix, and two over the hip – two right and two left. He probably would have worn more if he had the real estate. We were split into two relays (to make it easier for Dave to give each shooter some personal attention, as required; and to give us room to move), so we would be sitting back behind the other relay reloading our mags while they were shooting. Tactical Tommy threw his Glock/RMR on the ground again, and I called it the Tactical Toss. One of the older gentlemen in the course, as nonchalantly as you can imagine, says, ‘That’s the New York reload.’ We laughed our asses off at that one.
It was obvious Tommy had been to a lot of courses (or watched a lot of YT videos, we weren’t sure), because he did all the stuff the gurus say you’re ‘supposed’ to do. If he was shooting and had to clear a malfunction (which he did a lot, both on the .22 he used most of the time, and the RMR Glock), he would take a tiny step to the side as he was doing it. A tiny step, not a normal step, or anything that would get him out of the supposed line of fire. Just enough movement to say he moved. His weapon manipulation was great – we were pretty sure he spends hours doing them in front of the mirror. But his draw was very mechanical. Appendix draw: grab shirt and lift to expose the pistol. Slight pause. Draw pistol, release shirt, support hand meets pistol in front of chest. Slight pause. Punch out to full extension. Pause. Fire. Every. Pause. Single. Pause. (clear malfunction, tiny step to the left). Time. It got to the point that even Dave made a couple comments towards the end today. Nothing directly at him, just little comments referencing one of the tacticool things Tommy was doing, who came up with them, and why they were a waste of time.
So, to recap this novel: great course, lots of good information for both myself and the wife. Met some good people, planning to stay in touch with some of them. Will definitely be looking out for more of Dave’s courses, while also looking at other instructors for good stuff.
Side note: my wife was a little nervous going in, because she was expecting to be the only female – and she was. I don’t think anyone really cared, but she felt a little out of place. In the initial classroom portion (very short portion, probably 90% of time was on the range), Dave addressed her midway through his lecture “I’m really trying not to swear”. To which she laughed and said, “Oh don’t worry. I was in the Navy.” Once we were on the range, she felt even more out of place because she was not shooting well. Remember the Micro-Compact 1911 I mentioned, talking about the issues with sights and gunsmiths? Well, between all the running back and forth to gunsmiths, me being out of town for a different shooting course (for work), and then us going to Florida to see family during my son’s fall break (got back a day before heading to MS for this), she never got any range time to work out the bugs on that pistol. Note to self (and anyone else for that matter): if you are going to a shooting course that assumes you have a clue what you are doing, don’t take a gun you haven’t shot before.
I had been thinking about that fact going in, but she has a full size 1911 double stack she shoots just fine, so I knew she could handle .45. Problem is, a 3” barreled .45 shoots and handles quite a bit differently from a full frame 5” barreled .45. So, lesson learned. She reverted to her normal carry piece, a Bersa .380 and shot much better (she said she felt better overall after shooting with that, because she knows how to shoot and she didn’t want to look like the ‘clueless woman’ who ate up all the instructor’s time). The guy next to me (retired warrant/former SF dude), then offered (and produced) a Springfield EMP for her to shoot on day 2 (today). The EMP is basically the same gun as her Springfield Micro-Compact 1911, except it’s in 9mm instead of .45 – much easier for her (or anyone, for that matter) to manage. And in other news, it looks like I just inherited a Micro-Compact 1911, and my wife is looking to buy an EMP 9mm.