I have no intentions of arguing. I’ve said nothing worth arguing.
Can of paint thinner and a golf club.
Make it look like you were getting high and accidentally caught on fire.
The golf club is to put you out with.
1 Like
I know of a guy who, as a kid, had a guy who hung around his neighborhood. Not sure if he was homeless or not, but he was definitely not-all-there. He might’ve made some comments or acted creepy towards the guy’s mom/sister. In my head, I imagine a Cape Fear type of situation, but I don’t think the guy had any past relationship with the family. Thing went on for quite a while, maybe they escalated at some point, like he started messing with the house or waiting for the guy’s dad to be gone to start up his yelling, I don’t remember for sure. I just know things got “worse” in some way. Anyway, one day, the guy’s dad has him, his mom, and his sister leave town for a few days. Like this was an agreed-upon trip between the parents. The dad was staying, everyone else was leaving. So they did, and when they came back, the weird dude was gone. No one ever saw or heard from him again. It was never talked about, it was just obvious that he had, uh, left. Permanently.
5 Likes
Appreciate the story.
Unpopular opinion: This is how it should be.
I have told this story on this forum years ago, in answer to someone’s idiotic claim that it used to be acceptable to beat women.
My grandfather told me that in the 1950’s a lady who worked in the drug store with my grandmother called out sick, one of her co-workers went to check on her and found her with a black eye and a bloody lip. Some of the church deacons went to talk to the husband to urge him to stop beating his wife. They were polite, he told them to fuck off.
A few weeks later his wife had apparently received another beating, so the deacons met him in the parking lot of the furniture plant when he got off work and beat the shit out of him so bad he couldn’t get out of bed for two weeks.
But on the other the of the spectrum of vigilantism are lynchings, which weren’t just reserved for African Americans.
I think it’s just better if we actually had a functional justice system in this country, instead if the anarcho-tyranny we have now. It’s better for the criminals as well. The defund the police crowd are opening pandora’s box.
Edit: typo
2 Likes
You would pick random private property on a porch to chill if you were homeless? Just seems like there are plenty of better places to do that instead of private property on someone’s literal doorstep.
Around where I live that will get you taking the room temperature challenge real quick like.
Some states still have semi-functional “justice” systems, but they are rapidly disappearing.
When the state won’t protect the law-abiding, the law-abiding must take things into their own hands and it will not be pretty.
Good. If it had been my relative, he would have gotten worse.
Keep in mind most homeless people are on drugs, mentally ill, or both.
Which makes it even more dangerous for them to be on private property.
Dead men tell no lies…
1 Like
Let us take a trip down to the delta where nobody can hear you scream 
1 Like
I also know some pig farmers we can go visit.
1 Like
Oh we have plenty of wild hogs that will do the work too lol.
Everything except the lower jaw bone.
Leftist tolerance
2 Likes
Obey and conform you backwards bigot! 
I have been playing this song/video over and over lately since it is ringing so true:
Disturbed - The Vengeful One [Official Music Video] - YouTube
1 Like
That’s fucking disgusting
2 Likes
The headline is a tad misleading IMO.
It seems they are trying to ban Zionist speakers. I am against banning speakers of any kind (outside of the really crazy shit) on a public platform. I consider a public university as a public platform. I do think there are good arguments against Zionism (Zionism being advocating for the expansion of Israel, if I understand it correctly). I’d like to see them allow those who support Zionism speak, and have their rebuttals after.
I wouldn’t equate banning Zionist speakers as being equal to developing Jewish free zones though. That is a different kettle of fish IMO. The article makes the claim:
I believe that is how they are equating banning Zionist speakers as being anti Jewish, or developing Jewish free zones.
1 Like
I would argue that all Jews should be zionists. The uneducated and I believe antisemitic people who argue against zionism and vilify Israel with labels such as colonizers should ask themselves how Islam managed to spread from the Middle East to Africa and to Persia and beyond. We’re talking about parts of the world where women and girls have few rights and slavery still exists.
The truth is, leftists equate success with oppression and evil. Winners are criminals and losers are victims. A successful leftist will apologize for being successful and claim they didn’t earn it as it was all the result of undeserved privilege. They’re all a bunch of miserable, no self esteem having, cultureless, rootless, generic weasels.
4 Likes
Imagine trying to set up a law firm while also banning Jews from said law firm.
Would be a ‘firm’ of 1.
3 Likes