Guys in prison? I don’t recall hearing guys talk about sexual assault.
Except speak up when someone bragged about doing it.
And I’ve trained women to prevent sexual assault, so I could argue that I have done more.
Perhaps it’s my LE background but I find Biden’s pathological inappropriate touching of young girls far creepier than Trump’s many character flaws. It’s a sad state of affairs when this is what our political candidacy has come to.
1 Like
The fact he does those actions in public says that maybe he doesn’t think he is doing anything wrong. The fact that Trump says what he did when he thinks no one can hear him, says something else.
You seem to be a disingenuous little man. Let’s put this dick swinging contest to bed. Not only have I arrested, testified against, and helped put sexual predators in prison but have also worn the red-man suit in a college self defense class for women.
Out of curiosity who do you think is more likely to have committed sexual assault or had a sexual encounter with a minor?
I think it’s Trump easily.
Considering there is video of Biden touching young girls inappropriately, it is him.
Or maybe he knows he’s protected from prosecution.
One has as far as I know one woman claiming sexual assault. The other has a book written about him, has admitted to sexual assault, and has partied with someone who’s known for having a minor fuck island. I’ll take the numbers personally.
You shouldn’t use big words you don’t know the meanings of.
Locker rooms. Dick swinging. I’m starting to put a picture together. And now I’m stopping.
Do you want a cookie?
Norman Thomas once stated, “If you want a symbolic gesture, don’t burn the flag; wash it.”
1 Like
Kinda sucks that Biden has no idea where he is or what century he is living in. Dementia sucks.
I don’t know, he’s always meeting new people and he can hide his own Easter eggs.
3 Likes
20-25% of Americans will not get a vaccine should one become available for Coronavirus. Some are concerned that Bill Gates will use the vaccine to implant microchips into the population.
Put me in that 20-25%. Does that make me stoopid?
2 Likes
If the vaccine is shown to be safe, and comes at little to no cost, what is YOUR reasoning for not getting it?
What do you consider “shown to be safe”? Will there be human studies with enough elapsed time to determine any long-term effects? How long do you think this should take?
Do you currently vaccinate or support vaccination? Or is it just this vaccination you’d hesitate on?
From what i have seen, the regulatory bodies would rush a vaccine through for use in the most susceptible populations, while widespread distribution would would follow after more thorough human testing more in-line with typical standards (although on a fast-tracked timeline).
Maybe the seasonal flu shot has clouded my view, and im certainly no expert here, but it seems like a virus vaccine would need less testing (time wise) than a chemical cocktail/drug. The season flu vaccine is cooked up the season prior and is a guess as to what specific strain will be the most prominent in the coming season. But new “drugs” use proprietary methods and pathways and so need to be more thoroughly tested. Do you know if there are differences in regulations for minimum testing based upon the type of drug or vaccine?
What would have to be done for folks to believe the vaccine was safe?