All these years and noone had ever advocated for rights for my roomba
3 Likes
We have working sex robots? Anyone know a good divorce lawyer?
One of the comments
I would never have a sex robot.
First they probably cost too much.
Second l would never leave the house.
Haha, l thought that was funny.
2 Likes
Alas, the divorce robots arenât nearly so advanced yet.
Not stupid but always a good place for funny stuff. One for both sides.
2 Likes
Sadly, people believe that stuff.
1 Like
Ok, Iâll bite. What are her domestic policy positions? The only things sheâs taking about is foreign policy and that there will be money for everything after the US gets out of the ânew cold warâ (an expression pushed by Putin) with Russia and China.
Besides that, itâs only âMSMâ, âbut Hillaryâ and âDNC is corruptâ from her. Sheâs repeating most of the stuff that helped Trump win than Trump himself and is polling around one percent.
And Russian media is behind her 24/7:
On relations with Russia, she is a strong advocate of replacing the current policy of sanctions and confrontation with serious diplomacy and normalization, and is committed to ending what she describes as the âNew Cold Warâ .
Tulsi Gabbard, in sum, has been inspirationally fearless in her willingness to confront the neocon and liberal interventionist establishment in the US with a political vision that is rooted in anti-hegemony, anti-war and pro-peace, a vision she articulates with great passion and eloquence. Oh, and by the way, sheâs also served in the military, ticking thereby an increasingly necessary box for putative leaders in a country in which the cult of the armed forces is the most pervasive cult of all.
Though very much in the minority in opposing US hegemony as being coterminous with human progress and civilization, Tulsi Gabbardâs emergence fills a glaring lacuna in a political culture in Washington chronically afflicted with the moral and rabid sickness of an empire that has entered its mad dog days.
In this quest, she calls to mind another great American champion of peace rather than war, of the substitution of human connectedness for American exceptionalism, and of the principles set out in the UN Charter of respect for international law, national sovereignty, and self-determination.
His name was Henry Wallace, a true progressive who had served as Rooseveltâs vice president between 1940 and 1944, before being replaced by Harry Truman. Wallace campaigned for a vision of the rest of the 20th century at the end of the war as the âCentury of the Common Manâ. It set him miles apart not from the mass of the American people whoâd seen loved ones perish and permanently maimed, physically and psychologically, in the war, but from the arms dealers and war hawks in Washington for whom permanent war was the only road to the Roman peace they believed in.
How different history could have been if Henry Wallace rather than Harry S. Truman had been vice president upon the death of Roosevelt at the close of the war in 1945.
Writing of Henry Wallace in their âUntold History of the United Statesâ, co-authors Oliver Stone and Peter Kuznick included a speech he gave in New York in 1946 on the first anniversary of FDRâs death. During the speech, Wallace responded to the sentiments of confrontation with the Soviet Union advocated by Winston Churchill in his infamous âIron Curtain speechâ, delivered in Fulton, Missouri the previous month.
Wallace: âA month ago Mr Churchill came out for the Anglo-Saxon century. Four years ago I repudiated the American century. Today I repudiate the Anglo-Saxon century with even greater vigor. The common people of the world will not tolerate a recrudescence of imperialism even under enlightened Anglo-Saxon, atomic bomb auspices. The destiny of the English-speaking world is to serve the world, not dominate it.â
Tulsi Gabbard is our Henry Wallace, a person whose vision of a world shorn of cold and hot wars in the cause not of democracy or freedom but hegemony, empire and domination places her on a higher moral and ethical plane than her counterparts. Her fidelity to spreading the truth and excoriating the war mongers and hawks is testament to a woman inspired by Wallaceâs example.
As in his time, the crucial question in ours revolves around whether America is ready to hear this particular truth â the truth about the real motives and vested interests that are driving US foreign policy and Washingtonâs engagement with the world â and act upon it.
1 Like
I didnât post the link because I support Gabbard. I merely found it highly amusing Killary Clinton is using the olâ Russian playbook on yet another of her âenemiesâ.
Who the fuck is Hillary in late 2019? Which office does she hold? The only people missing Hillary (and calling on her to run again, mind you) are Trump, Tulsi and the Russians.
And unfortunately, when it comes to foreign policy issues, Hillary was remarkably prescient. Itâs another thing people canât stand her so they ignore the message.
I suspect one of Hillaryâs motivations to stir the pot is to sell more books ⊠she just published one cowritten with her daughter ⊠seems whenever sheâs in the headlines is when sheâs promoting this or that that will boost her bottom line ⊠she might be abhorrent but she ainât a dummy
2 Likes
The same lying murderous twat she has always been.
Itâs amazing how reactive you are to Russian oligarchs but donât see an American one in Clinton Inc.
3 Likes
And what about âTrump Inc.â, @SkyzykS?
If the two men are still alive in 4-5 years; I can only imagine the havoc that will be created by Putin; a lame-duck President Trump; and an ex-U.S. President Trump.
There is no comparison between her and Russian oligarchs. From simply a financial view, they have much more money.
Come on. Unlike Hillary, who gave Chelsea a position in the White House when she was president, Trump has kept his family out of the Oval Office.
The more I see of his decision making, the more I think he should be on the same gallows as the Clintons.
They might be parading under different banners but they are cut from the same cloth.
1 Like
The only reason she isnât on par with them is because she lost the election.
Her foundation/international shakedown racket was pretty brilliant though.
If it were, she would have been president.
1 Like
Pretty brilliant. Not absolutely.
Canât really disagree though.